Department of Surgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Conventus, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Activ Surgical Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5957-5966. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11061-w. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
Subjective surgeon interpretation of near-infrared perfusion video is limited by low inter-observer agreement and poor correlation to clinical outcomes. In contrast, quantification of indocyanine green fluorescence video (Q-ICG) correlates with histologic level of perfusion as well as clinical outcomes. Measuring dye volume over time, however, has limitations, such as it is not on-demand, has poor spatial resolution, and is not easily repeatable. Laser speckle contrast imaging quantification (Q-LSCI) is a real-time, dye-free alternative, but further validation is needed. We hypothesize that Q-LSCI will distinguish ischemic tissue and correlate over a range of perfusion levels equivalent to Q-ICG.
Nine sections of intestine in three swine were devascularized. Pairs of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging and laser speckle contrast imaging video were quantified within perfused, watershed, and ischemic regions. Q-ICG used normalized peak inflow slope. Q-LSCI methods were laser speckle perfusion units (LSPU), the base unit of laser speckle imaging, relative perfusion units (RPU), a previously described methodology which utilizes an internal control, and zero-lag normalized cross-correlation (X-Corr), to investigate if the signal deviations convey accurate perfusion information. We determine the ability to distinguish ischemic regions and correlation to Q-ICG over a perfusion gradient.
All modalities distinguished ischemic from perfused regions of interest; Q-ICG values of 0.028 and 0.155 (p < 0.001); RPU values of 0.15 and 0.68 (p < 0.001); and X-corr values of 0.73 and 0.24 (p < 0.001). Over a range of perfusion levels, RPU had the best correlation with Q-ICG (r = 0.79, p < 0.001) compared with LSPU (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) and X-Corr (r = 0.46, p < 0.001).
These results demonstrate that Q-LSCI discriminates ischemic from perfused tissue and represents similar perfusion information over a broad range of perfusion levels comparable to clinically validated Q-ICG. This suggests that Q-LSCI might offer clinically predictive real-time dye-free quantification of tissue perfusion. Further work should include validation in histologic studies and human clinical trials.
近红外灌注视频的主观外科医生解读受到观察者间一致性低和与临床结果相关性差的限制。相比之下,吲哚菁绿荧光视频的量化(Q-ICG)与组织学灌注水平以及临床结果相关。然而,测量染料的体积随时间的变化具有一些局限性,例如它不是按需的,空间分辨率差,并且不容易重复。激光散斑对比成像量化(Q-LSCI)是一种实时、无染料的替代方法,但需要进一步验证。我们假设 Q-LSCI 将区分缺血组织,并在与 Q-ICG 相当的一系列灌注水平上进行相关。
将三头猪的 9 个肠段进行血管化。在灌注、分水岭和缺血区域内对成对的吲哚菁绿荧光成像和激光散斑对比成像视频进行定量。Q-ICG 使用归一化峰值流入斜率。Q-LSCI 方法是激光散斑灌注单位(LSPU),是激光散斑成像的基本单位,相对灌注单位(RPU),是一种以前描述的方法,利用内部对照,以及零延迟归一化互相关(X-Corr),以研究信号偏差是否传达准确的灌注信息。我们确定了在灌注梯度上区分缺血区域和与 Q-ICG 相关的能力。
所有模态都能区分感兴趣的缺血和灌注区域;Q-ICG 值为 0.028 和 0.155(p<0.001);RPU 值为 0.15 和 0.68(p<0.001);X-Corr 值为 0.73 和 0.24(p<0.001)。在一系列灌注水平下,RPU 与 Q-ICG 的相关性最好(r=0.79,p<0.001),而 LSPU(r=0.74,p<0.001)和 X-Corr(r=0.46,p<0.001)。
这些结果表明,Q-LSCI 可区分缺血组织和灌注组织,并在与临床验证的 Q-ICG 相当的广泛灌注水平范围内代表相似的灌注信息。这表明 Q-LSCI 可能提供临床预测性的实时无染料组织灌注定量。进一步的工作应包括在组织学研究和人体临床试验中的验证。