Division of Musculoskeletal & Interventional Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, NY 10021, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, NY 10021,USA.
Pain Manag. 2024 Jun 2;14(5-6):305-314. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2377061. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
Traditional radiofrequency ablation (TRFA) effectively treats facet joint-related pain, while water-cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) may offer benefits like larger lesions and easier nerve access. Our goal is to assess the effectiveness of TRFA and CRFA for facet joint-related pain. This retrospective study included an evaluation of 346 RFA interventions performed on 190 patients suffering from long-term low-back pain. The primary outcome was defined as a decrease of ≥50% of the mean numeric rating scale. The primary outcome was achieved at the first follow-up (FU) for both TRFA and CRFA, with pain relief of 55.2 and 60.5%, respectively. At the second FU, the primary outcome was achieved only in the CRFA group (54.1%), although the TRFA group also showed a good improvement (48.6%). In both groups, pain relief was under 50% during the third FU. Our study indicates that both CRFA and TRFA modalities are effective and safe treatments.
传统射频消融术(TRFA)能有效治疗关节突关节相关疼痛,而水冷射频消融术(CRFA)可能具有更大的病变和更容易接近神经的优点。我们的目标是评估 TRFA 和 CRFA 治疗关节突关节相关疼痛的效果。本回顾性研究纳入了 190 例长期腰痛患者的 346 例 RFA 介入治疗,主要结局定义为平均数字评分量表降低≥50%。TRFA 和 CRFA 在首次随访(FU)时均达到主要结局,缓解率分别为 55.2%和 60.5%。在第二次 FU 时,仅在 CRFA 组达到主要结局(54.1%),尽管 TRFA 组也有较好的改善(48.6%)。在两组中,第三次 FU 时疼痛缓解均低于 50%。我们的研究表明,CRFA 和 TRFA 两种方式都是有效和安全的治疗方法。