Imnadze Guram, Fink Thomas, El Hamriti Mustapha, Bergau Leonard, Braun Martin, Khalaph Moneeb, Sciacca Vanessa, Isgandarova Khuraman, Guckel Denise, Sohns Christian, Sommer Philipp
Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-University Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, NRW, Germany.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 1;23(4):118. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2304118. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Following its introduction into clinical practice, the cryoballoon (CB) has proved to be an alternative for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). In comparison with the standard radiofrequency procedure, the CB method results in a shorter procedure time and learning curve as well as a higher degree of reproducibility. A new cryoballoon (NCB) was recently introduced on the market. In this review, we addressed the following questions: Is the new system technically similar to the previous one? Is there a difference in terms of periprocedural parameters? Are acute success and complication rates similar? Is the learning curve different?
自引入临床实践以来，冷冻球囊（CB）已被证明是阵发性和持续性心房颤动（AF）患者肺静脉隔离（PVI）的一种替代方法。与标准射频手术相比，CB方法可缩短手术时间和学习曲线，并具有更高的可重复性。一种新型冷冻球囊（NCB）最近已投放市场。在本综述中，我们探讨了以下问题：新系统在技术上是否与之前的系统相似？围手术期参数方面是否存在差异？急性成功率和并发症发生率是否相似？学习曲线是否不同？
