Suppr超能文献

在新兴国家中使用植入式心脏复律除颤器预防心源性猝死:改善 SCA 临床试验。

Utilization of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for the prevention of sudden cardiac death in emerging countries: Improve SCA clinical trial.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

National Heart Centre of Singapore, Outram District, Singapore.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2020 Mar;17(3):468-475. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.09.023. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are underutilized in Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The Improve SCA Study is the largest prospective study to evaluate the benefit of ICD therapy in underrepresented geographies. This analysis reports the primary objective of the study.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study was to determine whether patients with primary prevention (PP) indications with specific risk factors (1.5PP: syncope, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, premature ventricular contractions >10/h, and low ventricular ejection fraction <25%) are at a similar risk of life-threatening arrhythmias as patients with secondary prevention (SP) indications and to evaluate all-cause mortality rates in 1.5PP patients with and without devices.

METHODS

A total of 3889 patients were included in the analysis to evaluate ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation therapy and mortality rates. Patients were stratified as SP (n = 1193) and patients with PP indications. The PP cohort was divided into 1.5PP patients (n = 1913) and those without any 1.5PP criteria (n = 783). The decision to undergo ICD implantation was left to the patient and/or physician. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compute hazard ratios.

RESULTS

Patients had predominantly nonischemic cardiomyopathy. The rate of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in 1.5PP patients was not equivalent (within 30%) to that in patients with SP indications (hazard ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.57) but was higher than that in PP patients without any 1.5PP criteria (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.97) (P = .03). There was a 49% relative risk reduction in all-cause mortality in ICD implanted 1.5PP patients. In addition, the number needed to treat to save 1 life over 3 years was 10.0 in the 1.5PP cohort vs 40.0 in PP patients without any 1.5PP criteria.

CONCLUSION

These data corroborate the mortality benefit of ICD therapy and support extension to a selected PP population from underrepresented geographies.

摘要

背景

在亚洲、拉丁美洲、东欧、中东和非洲,植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的应用不足。Improve SCA 研究是评估代表性不足地区 ICD 治疗获益的最大前瞻性研究。本分析报告了该研究的主要目标。

目的

本研究的目的是确定具有特定风险因素(1.5PP:晕厥、非持续性室性心动过速、室性早搏 >10/小时和低心室射血分数 <25%)的一级预防(PP)指征患者与二级预防(SP)指征患者发生威胁生命的心律失常的风险是否相似,并评估 1.5PP 患者有无器械的全因死亡率。

方法

共纳入 3889 例患者进行室性心动过速或颤动治疗和死亡率评估。患者分为 SP(n = 1193)和 PP 指征患者。PP 队列分为 1.5PP 患者(n = 1913)和无任何 1.5PP 标准的患者(n = 783)。ICD 植入的决策由患者和/或医生决定。Cox 比例风险模型用于计算风险比。

结果

患者主要患有非缺血性心肌病。1.5PP 患者的室性心动过速或颤动发生率(<30%)与 SP 指征患者的发生率不同(风险比 0.47;95%置信区间 0.38-0.57),但高于无任何 1.5PP 标准的 PP 患者(风险比 0.67;95%置信区间 0.46-0.97)(P =.03)。ICD 植入 1.5PP 患者的全因死亡率降低了 49%。此外,3 年内每治疗 10.0 例患者可挽救 1 例患者,而在无任何 1.5PP 标准的 PP 患者中为 40.0 例。

结论

这些数据证实了 ICD 治疗的死亡率获益,并支持将其扩展至代表性不足地区的选定 PP 人群。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验