• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用比例杰卡德指数和合并症模式的心力衰竭无创风险预测模型

Noninvasive Risk Prediction Models for Heart Failure Using Proportional Jaccard Indices and Comorbidity Patterns.

作者信息

Tang Yueh, Wang Chao-Hung, Mitra Prasenjit, Pai Tun-Wen

机构信息

Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, 106344 Taipei, Taiwan.

Heart Failure Research Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 204201 Keelung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 20;25(5):179. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2505179. eCollection 2024 May.

DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2505179
PMID:39076472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11267177/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era, remote diagnosis and precision preventive medicine have emerged as pivotal clinical medicine applications. This study aims to develop a digital health-monitoring tool that utilizes electronic medical records (EMRs) as the foundation for performing a non-random correlation analysis among different comorbidity patterns for heart failure (HF).

METHODS

Novel similarity indices, including proportional Jaccard index (PJI), multiplication of the odds ratio proportional Jaccard index (OPJI), and alpha proportional Jaccard index (APJI), provide a fundamental framework for constructing machine learning models to predict the risk conditions associated with HF.

RESULTS

Our models were constructed for different age groups and sexes and yielded accurate predictions of high-risk HF across demographics. The results indicated that the optimal prediction model achieved a notable accuracy of 82.1% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.878.

CONCLUSIONS

Our noninvasive HF risk prediction system is based on historical EMRs and provides a practical approach. The proposed indices provided simple and straightforward comparative indicators of comorbidity pattern matching within individual EMRs. All source codes developed for our noninvasive prediction models can be retrieved from GitHub.

摘要

背景

在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)后的时代,远程诊断和精准预防医学已成为关键的临床医学应用。本研究旨在开发一种数字健康监测工具,该工具以电子病历(EMR)为基础,对心力衰竭(HF)的不同合并症模式进行非随机相关性分析。

方法

新型相似性指数,包括比例杰卡德指数(PJI)、优势比比例杰卡德指数(OPJI)和α比例杰卡德指数(APJI),为构建机器学习模型以预测与HF相关的风险状况提供了基本框架。

结果

我们针对不同年龄组和性别构建了模型,并在不同人群中对高危HF进行了准确预测。结果表明,最佳预测模型的准确率达到了显著的82.1%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.878。

结论

我们的无创HF风险预测系统基于历史EMR,提供了一种实用方法。所提出的指数为个体EMR内合并症模式匹配提供了简单直接的比较指标。为我们的无创预测模型开发的所有源代码均可从GitHub上获取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8995/11267177/31708d89834f/2153-8174-25-5-179-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8995/11267177/31708d89834f/2153-8174-25-5-179-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8995/11267177/31708d89834f/2153-8174-25-5-179-g1.jpg

相似文献

1
Noninvasive Risk Prediction Models for Heart Failure Using Proportional Jaccard Indices and Comorbidity Patterns.使用比例杰卡德指数和合并症模式的心力衰竭无创风险预测模型
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 20;25(5):179. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2505179. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Risk prediction of heart failure in patients with ischemic heart disease using network analytics and stacking ensemble learning.利用网络分析和堆叠集成学习预测缺血性心脏病患者心力衰竭的风险。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 May 23;23(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02196-2.
3
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With Traditional Models for Use of Administrative Claims With Electronic Medical Records to Predict Heart Failure Outcomes.利用电子病历中的行政索赔数据进行机器学习方法与传统模型预测心力衰竭结局的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18962.
4
A comparison of rule-based and machine learning approaches for classifying patient portal messages.基于规则和机器学习方法在患者门户消息分类中的比较。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Sep;105:110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
5
Machine learning-based model for predicting 1 year mortality of hospitalized patients with heart failure.基于机器学习的模型预测心力衰竭住院患者 1 年死亡率。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):4077-4085. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13556. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
6
7
Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Hospital Readmissions and Worsening Heart Failure Events in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Modeling Study.射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者再入院及心力衰竭恶化事件预测的机器学习算法比较:建模研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 17;7:e41775. doi: 10.2196/41775.
8
Embedding-based link predictions to explore latent comorbidity of chronic diseases.基于嵌入的链接预测以探索慢性病的潜在共病情况。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2022 Dec 30;11(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s13755-022-00206-7. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
10
Development of an Online Health Care Assessment for Preventive Medicine: A Machine Learning Approach.预防医学在线医疗保健评估的开发:一种机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 5;22(6):e18585. doi: 10.2196/18585.

本文引用的文献

1
A better index for analysis of co-occurrence and similarity.用于共现和相似性分析的更好指标。
Sci Adv. 2022 Jan 28;8(4):eabj9204. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj9204. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
2
Breast cancer distant recurrence lead time interval by detection method in an institutional cohort.基于机构队列研究的乳腺癌远处复发的检测方法及时间间隔。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 20;20(1):1124. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07609-3.
3
Epidemiology of heart failure.心力衰竭的流行病学。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;22(8):1342-1356. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1858. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
4
Relative risks and odds ratios: Simple rules on when and how to use them.相对风险和比值比:关于何时以及如何使用它们的简单规则。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Apr 20:e13249. doi: 10.1111/eci.13249.
5
A diagnostic accuracy study validating cardiovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases. The Umbria Data-Value Project.一项验证心血管 ICD-9-CM 代码在医疗保健管理数据库中的诊断准确性的研究。翁布里亚数据价值项目。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 8;14(7):e0218919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218919. eCollection 2019.
6
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家层面 195 个国家和地区 1990 年至 2017 年 354 种疾病和伤害导致的发病率、患病率和伤残损失寿命年:基于 2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
7
Theory of signs and statistical approach to big data in assessing the relevance of clinical biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress.符号理论与大数据的统计方法在评估炎症和氧化应激的临床生物标志物相关性中的应用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 6;115(10):2473-2477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719807115. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
8
A Most Odd Ratio:: Interpreting and Describing Odds Ratios.一个极其奇怪的比率:解读和描述比值比
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Feb;52(2):224-228. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.030. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
9
Using recurrent neural network models for early detection of heart failure onset.使用循环神经网络模型进行心力衰竭发作的早期检测。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):361-370. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw112.
10
Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss.组合时间序列揭示了生物多样性的变化,但没有系统的损失。
Science. 2014 Apr 18;344(6181):296-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1248484.