• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双臂血压差值、双下肢血压差值及踝臂指数对急性主动脉夹层的预测价值

The Predictive Value of Inter Arm Blood Pressure Difference, Inter Leg Blood Pressure Difference and Ankle Brachial Index for Acute Aortic Dissection.

作者信息

Zhou Quan, Huang Sufang

机构信息

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030 Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 4;24(1):9. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2401009. eCollection 2023 Jan.

DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2401009
PMID:39076859
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11270447/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Abnormal inter arm systolic blood pressure, inter leg systolic blood pressure and ankle brachial index (ABI) are related to vascular diseases. Our aim was to evaluate the correlation of inter arm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBPD), inter leg systolic blood pressure difference (ILSBPD), and ABI with acute aortic dissection (AAD) and their role in predicting AAD.

METHODS

In this prospective case-control study, 180 patients with AAD admitted to the emergency department were prospectively and consecutively collected in Tongji Hospital from October 2019 to December 2020. 180 healthy people matched by sex, age and BMI served as control group. All participants were adults over 18 years of age who underwent four-limb blood pressure measurements. IASBPD, ILSBPD and ABI were compared between the two groups and their associations with AAD were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 360 patients (180 cases and 180 controls) were analyzed. In case group IASBPD was larger [(15.23 16.15) mm Hg (4.19 3.63) mm Hg] and ILSBPD was larger (13.00 mm Hg 5.70 mm Hg). ABI was smaller [(0.98 0.24) (1.12 0.09)], and the difference was statistically significant (all 0.05). According to the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), IASBPD 10 mm Hg (Sen 61.7%, Spe 88.9%), ILSBPD 13 mm Hg (Sen 50.6%, Spe 80.6%) and ABI 0.9 (Sen 53.3%, Spe 87.2%), showed significant correlation with AAD (all 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with healthy people, IASBPD and ILSBPD levels were higher and ABI levels were lower in patients with AAD. IASBPD 10 mm Hg and ILSBPD 13 mm Hg can be used as indicators for early screening of AAD, and IASBPD 10 mm Hg has better predictive value for the occurrence of AAD. In patients with typical chest pain, attention needs to be paid to measuring blood pressure in the extremities.

摘要

引言

双臂收缩压、双腿收缩压及踝臂指数(ABI)异常与血管疾病相关。我们的目的是评估双臂收缩压差(IASBPD)、双腿收缩压差(ILSBPD)及ABI与急性主动脉夹层(AAD)的相关性及其在预测AAD中的作用。

方法

在这项前瞻性病例对照研究中,2019年10月至2020年12月在同济医院前瞻性连续收集180例急诊收治的AAD患者。180名性别、年龄和BMI匹配的健康人作为对照组。所有参与者均为18岁以上的成年人,均接受了四肢血压测量。比较两组间的IASBPD、ILSBPD及ABI,并分析它们与AAD的相关性。

结果

共分析360例患者(180例病例和180例对照)。病例组IASBPD更大[(15.23±16.15)mmHg对(4.19±3.63)mmHg],ILSBPD更大(13.00mmHg对5.70mmHg)。ABI更小[(0.98±0.24)对(1.12±0.09)],差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。根据受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),IASBPD≥10mmHg(敏感度61.7%,特异度88.9%)、ILSBPD≥13mmHg(敏感度50.6%,特异度80.6%)及ABI≤0.9(敏感度53.3%,特异度87.2%)与AAD显著相关(均P<0.001)。

结论

与健康人相比,AAD患者的IASBPD和ILSBPD水平更高,ABI水平更低。IASBPD≥10mmHg和ILSBPD≥13mmHg可作为AAD早期筛查指标,且IASBPD≥10mmHg对AAD发生有更好的预测价值。对于有典型胸痛的患者,需注意测量四肢血压。

相似文献

1
The Predictive Value of Inter Arm Blood Pressure Difference, Inter Leg Blood Pressure Difference and Ankle Brachial Index for Acute Aortic Dissection.双臂血压差值、双下肢血压差值及踝臂指数对急性主动脉夹层的预测价值
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 4;24(1):9. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2401009. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Simultaneous inter-arm and inter-leg systolic blood pressure differences to diagnose peripheral artery disease: a diagnostic accuracy study.采用双臂和双腿收缩压同步差值诊断外周动脉疾病:一项诊断准确性研究。
Blood Press. 2018 Apr;27(2):112-119. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2017.1400903. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
3
Characteristics of four-limb blood pressure and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in Chinese patients with Takayasu arteritis.中国 Takayasu 动脉炎患者四肢血压和肱踝脉搏波速度的特征。
Blood Press. 2022 Dec;31(1):146-154. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2022.2091513.
4
The association of four-limb blood pressure differences with cardiovascular risk factors and target organ changes in elderly Chinese: The Northern Shanghai Study.四臂血压差异与老年中国人心血管危险因素和靶器官变化的关联:上海北部研究。
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2020;42(3):275-280. doi: 10.1080/10641963.2019.1649682. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
5
Simultaneously measured inter-arm and inter-leg systolic blood pressure differences and cardiovascular risk stratification: a systemic review and meta-analysis.同时测量的双臂和双腿收缩压差异与心血管风险分层:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015 Aug;9(8):640-650.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
Correlating the relationship between interarm systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk factors.关联双臂收缩压与心血管疾病风险因素之间的关系。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 May;19(5):466-471. doi: 10.1111/jch.12987. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
7
Association of an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: A meta-analysis of cohort studies.双臂收缩压差值与全因和心血管死亡率的关联:队列研究的荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2023 Dec;25(12):1069-1078. doi: 10.1111/jch.14746. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
8
Characteristics of Inter-Arm Difference in Blood Pressure in Acute Aortic Dissection.急性主动脉夹层的两臂血压差异特征。
J Nippon Med Sch. 2021 Nov 17;88(5):467-474. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2021_88-605. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
9
The ankle brachial index exhibits better association with cardiovascular outcomes than interarm systolic blood pressure difference in patients with type 2 diabetes.在2型糖尿病患者中,踝臂指数比双臂收缩压差与心血管结局的关联更强。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(19):e15556. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015556.
10
Evaluation of the role of combining inter-arm systolic pressure difference and derivatives of pulse volume recording in detecting subclavian artery stenosis.评估双臂收缩压差与脉搏容积记录衍生物相结合在检测锁骨下动脉狭窄中的作用。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 15;9:962610. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.962610. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
A case report: Efficacy of thoracic MRA for ischemic stroke due to acute aortic dissection.病例报告:胸部磁共振血管造影对急性主动脉夹层所致缺血性卒中的疗效
Acute Med Surg. 2025 May 19;12(1):e70066. doi: 10.1002/ams2.70066. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term (7-Year) Clinical Implications of Newly Unveiled Asymptomatic Abnormal Ankle-Brachial Index in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.新揭示的冠心病无症状异常踝臂指数的 7 年长期临床意义。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):e021587. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021587. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
Associations Between Systolic Interarm Differences in Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes and Mortality: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis, Development and Validation of a Prognostic Algorithm: The INTERPRESS-IPD Collaboration.血压双侧上肢收缩压差值与心血管疾病结局和死亡率的关系:个体参与者数据荟萃分析,预后算法的制定和验证:INTERPRESS-IPD 协作。
Hypertension. 2021 Feb;77(2):650-661. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15997. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
3
Acute type A aortic dissection - a review.急性 A 型主动脉夹层——综述。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2020 Feb;54(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2019.1660401. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
4
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
5
Bilateral blood pressure differential as a clinical marker for acute aortic dissection in the emergency department.双侧血压差异作为急诊科急性主动脉夹层的临床标志物。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Sep;35(9):556-558. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207499. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
6
2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2014年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)主动脉疾病诊断和治疗指南:涵盖成人胸主动脉和腹主动脉急慢性疾病的文件。欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)主动脉疾病诊断和治疗特别工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873-926. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
7
Diagnostic performance of the aortic dissection detection risk score in patients with suspected acute aortic dissection.主动脉夹层检测风险评分在疑似急性主动脉夹层患者中的诊断效能
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014 Dec;3(4):373-81. doi: 10.1177/2048872614527010. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
8
Acute aortic dissection type A.急性 A 型主动脉夹层。
Br J Surg. 2012 Oct;99(10):1331-44. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8840.
9
Clinical prediction of acute aortic dissection.急性主动脉夹层的临床预测
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Oct 23;160(19):2977-82. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.19.2977.