• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者双侧胸廓内动脉冠状动脉搭桥术的围手术期安全性

Perioperative Safety of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Coronary Bypass in Elderly.

作者信息

Chaban Ryan, Ghazy Ahmed, Treede Hendrik

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 3;24(1):4. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2401004. eCollection 2023 Jan.

DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2401004
PMID:39076871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11270442/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefits of utilizing internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) in coronary bypass surgery are well-known. However, the safety of this practice in elderly patients needs to be proven.

METHODS

We studied all patients who are 75 years of age and older, who received at least one ITA graft while undergoing isolated, conventional (median sternotomy) coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) between Jan 1st 2002 and Dec 31st 2020 (19 years). Emergent surgeries were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to reduce the patient selection effect. Study outcomes were 30-days mortality, and two sets of dependent intraoperative parameters and postoperative parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 1855 patients undergoing CABG was included, of which 1114 received a single left (s)ITA and 741 received combined left and right (d)ITA grafts. 519 pairs were matched. The decision for sITA or dITA was made individually. Thirty-days mortality was low and similar in both groups (sITA 3.3%; dITA 2.9%, = 0.859). The incidence of sternal wound healing disorder was higher after dITA (3.3 vs 6.9%; 0.011), which had also a longer skin-to-skin operative time (181 vs 205 min; 0.0001). Re-thoracotomy rates were similar (4.6 vs 6.2%; = 0.340). There were no significant differences in other secondary parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

harvesting both ITAs in elderly patients is safe and feasible. However, it increases the risk of sternal wound healing disorders. Long term benefit still needs to be proven.

摘要

背景

在冠状动脉搭桥手术中使用胸廓内动脉(ITA)的益处是众所周知的。然而,这种做法在老年患者中的安全性需要得到证实。

方法

我们研究了2002年1月1日至2020年12月31日(19年)期间所有75岁及以上、在接受孤立的传统(正中开胸)冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)时接受至少一根ITA移植的患者。急诊手术被排除在外。采用倾向评分匹配法以减少患者选择效应。研究结局为30天死亡率,以及两组相关的术中参数和术后参数。

结果

总共纳入了1855例行CABG的患者,其中1114例接受了单根左胸廓内动脉(sITA)移植,741例接受了左右胸廓内动脉联合(dITA)移植。匹配了519对。sITA或dITA的决策是单独做出的。两组的30天死亡率都很低且相似(sITA为3.3%;dITA为2.9%,P = 0.859)。dITA术后胸骨伤口愈合障碍的发生率更高(3.3%对6.9%;P = 0.011),其皮肤对皮肤的手术时间也更长(181分钟对205分钟;P = 0.0001)。再次开胸率相似(4.6%对6.2%;P = 0.340)。其他次要参数没有显著差异。

结论

在老年患者中采集双侧ITA是安全可行的。然而,这会增加胸骨伤口愈合障碍的风险。长期益处仍需证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab6/11270442/9a94633bfe6d/2153-8174-24-1-004-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab6/11270442/079b0a692f74/2153-8174-24-1-004-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab6/11270442/dada64f989eb/2153-8174-24-1-004-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab6/11270442/7444e49a720b/2153-8174-24-1-004-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab6/11270442/9a94633bfe6d/2153-8174-24-1-004-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab6/11270442/079b0a692f74/2153-8174-24-1-004-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab6/11270442/dada64f989eb/2153-8174-24-1-004-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab6/11270442/7444e49a720b/2153-8174-24-1-004-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab6/11270442/9a94633bfe6d/2153-8174-24-1-004-g4.jpg

相似文献

1
Perioperative Safety of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Coronary Bypass in Elderly.老年患者双侧胸廓内动脉冠状动脉搭桥术的围手术期安全性
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 3;24(1):4. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2401004. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Are all forms of total arterial revascularization equal? A comparison of single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting strategies.所有形式的全动脉血运重建都一样吗?单支与双侧胸廓内动脉移植策略的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;150(6):1526-33, 1534.e1-3; discussion 1533-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.05.074. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
3
Bilateral internal thoracic artery use in patients with low ejection fraction: is there any additional long-term benefit?射血分数低的患者使用双侧胸廓内动脉:是否有额外的长期益处?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Sep;46(3):425-31; discussion 431. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu023. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
4
Reusing the patent internal mammary artery as a conduit in redo coronary artery bypass surgery.在再次冠状动脉搭桥手术中复用胸廓内动脉作为血管桥。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;22(3):346-50. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv338. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
5
Perioperative outcomes of off-pump minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic arteries under direct vision†.直视下非体外循环双侧胸廓内动脉微创冠状动脉旁路移植术的围手术期结果†
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 May 1;24(5):696-701. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw431.
6
Radial artery as a second arterial graft in the elderly and both sexes.桡动脉作为老年和男女两性的第二条动脉移植物。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jul;2(4):453-7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.06.05.
7
Does bilateral ITA grafting increase perioperative complications? Outcome of 4462 patients with bilateral versus 4204 patients with single ITA bypass.双侧胸廓内动脉移植是否会增加围手术期并发症?4462例双侧胸廓内动脉搭桥患者与4204例单侧胸廓内动脉搭桥患者的结果对比。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Aug;30(2):318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.05.017. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
8
Bilateral internal thoracic artery use in two-vessel disease does not increase the perioperative risk-A propensity score matched analysis.双侧内乳动脉在双支病变中的应用并不会增加围手术期风险——一项倾向评分匹配分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 22;16(12):e0261176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261176. eCollection 2021.
9
Bilateral internal thoracic artery operations in the elderly.老年人的双侧胸廓内动脉手术
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2000 Apr;41(2):165-70.
10
Outcomes following surgical revascularization with single versus bilateral internal thoracic arterial grafts in patients with left main coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the EXCEL trial†.左主干冠状动脉疾病患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术时,单支与双侧胸廓内动脉桥的外科血运重建效果:EXCEL 试验的见解†。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Mar 1;55(3):501-510. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy291.

引用本文的文献

1
Sternal wound infections following internal mammary artery grafts for a coronary bypass: A meta-analysis.冠状动脉搭桥术中使用乳内动脉移植后的胸骨伤口感染:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Jan;21(1):e14349. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14349. Epub 2023 Aug 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Bilateral internal thoracic artery use in coronary artery bypass grafting in the post-ART era - Perspective.抗逆转录病毒治疗时代后双侧胸廓内动脉在冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用——观点
Int J Surg. 2021 Feb;86:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.12.007. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
2
Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in elderly patients: Any benefit in survival?老年患者双侧内乳动脉移植:在生存方面有获益吗?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;164(2):542-549. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.09.101. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
3
Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts at 10 Years.
双侧与单根胸廓内动脉桥在 10 年时的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):437-446. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808783.
4
Total Arterial Revascularization for Coronary Artery Bypass: A Gold Standard Searching for Evidence and Application.冠状动脉旁路移植术的全动脉血管重建:寻找证据与应用的金标准
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Sep 18;72(12):1341-1345. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.035.
5
Bilateral Versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts.双侧与单根胸廓内动脉桥接。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018 Jan 23;20(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-0947-1.
6
Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.随机对照试验:双侧与单侧胸廓内动脉桥血管移植的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 29;375(26):2540-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610021. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
7
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines on Arterial Conduits for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.胸外科医师协会冠状动脉旁路移植术动脉血管移植物临床实践指南
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Feb;101(2):801-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.100. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
8
The Choice of Conduits in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.冠状动脉旁路移植术中的桥血管选择。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Oct 13;66(15):1729-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.395.
9
Arterial coronary artery bypass grafting is safe and effective in elderly patients.动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术在老年患者中是安全有效的。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):607-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.032. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
10
Are two really always better than one? Results, concerns and controversies in the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries for coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.双内乳动脉在老年患者冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析的结果、关注点和争议。
Int J Surg. 2015 Apr;16(Pt B):163-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 15.