Schwarz Franziska Maria, Klotz Daniel Martin, Wimberger Pauline, Kuhlmann Jan Dominik
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 15;14:1392545. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1392545. eCollection 2024.
We have recently described a predictive/prognostic model for ovarian cancer, exploiting commonly available clinico-pathological parameters and the ovarian serum biomarkers mesothelin (MSL), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and cancer-antigen 125 (CA125). Considering urine as a prototype non-invasive sample, we investigated whether serum levels of these biomarkers are mirrored in urine and compared their clinical relevance in matched serum urine samples.
MSL, HE4 and CA125 were quantified in urinary (n=172) and matched serum samples (n=188) from ovarian cancer patients (n=192) using the Lumipulse G chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (Fujirebio).
While absolute concentrations of MSL or CA125 were higher in serum than in matched urine samples, HE4 concentrations were considerably higher in urine than in serum. Nonetheless, the levels of all three biomarkers strongly correlated between matched serum urine samples and were unrelated to mutational status. Consequently, prediction of surgical outcome or relapse/death by MSL, HE4 or CA125 was similarly efficient among urinary- serum-based detection. HE4 provided the highest capacity to predict surgical outcome or relapse/death among both body fluids (urine: AUC=0.854 serum: AUC=0.750, respectively). All clinically relevant findings regarding the investigated urinary biomarkers were equally reproducible among raw creatinine-normalized datasets, suggesting that normalization may have subordinate priority for urine-based analysis of these biomarkers.
We report that the capacity of MSL, HE4 and CA125 to predict surgical outcome and relapse/death is equivalent between serum urine-based detection. Urinary biomarkers, in particular HE4, may provide an additional dimension for prognostic modeling in ovarian cancer.
我们最近描述了一种卵巢癌的预测/预后模型,利用常见的临床病理参数以及卵巢血清生物标志物间皮素(MSL)、人附睾蛋白4(HE4)和癌抗原125(CA125)。考虑到尿液是一种典型的非侵入性样本,我们研究了这些生物标志物的血清水平在尿液中是否有反映,并比较了它们在匹配的血清和尿液样本中的临床相关性。
使用Lumipulse G化学发光酶免疫分析法(富士瑞必欧)对192例卵巢癌患者的尿液样本(n = 172)和匹配的血清样本(n = 188)中的MSL、HE4和CA125进行定量分析。
虽然血清中MSL或CA125的绝对浓度高于匹配的尿液样本,但尿液中HE4的浓度显著高于血清。尽管如此,所有三种生物标志物在匹配的血清和尿液样本之间的水平都高度相关,且与突变状态无关。因此,基于尿液和血清检测,MSL、HE4或CA125对手术结果或复发/死亡的预测效率相似。在两种体液中,HE4预测手术结果或复发/死亡的能力最强(尿液:AUC = 0.854;血清:AUC = 0.750)。所有关于所研究尿液生物标志物的临床相关发现,在原始数据集和肌酐标准化数据集之间同样具有可重复性,这表明对于这些生物标志物的尿液分析,标准化可能具有次要优先级。
我们报告,基于血清和尿液检测,MSL、HE4和CA125预测手术结果和复发/死亡的能力相当。尿液生物标志物,特别是HE4,可能为卵巢癌的预后建模提供一个额外的维度。