Wang Chengjian, Zhang Xiaomeng, Liu Chang, Zhang Chao, Sun Guolei, Zhou Jia
Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, 300222 Tianjin, China.
Department of Emergency, Tianjin University Jinnan Hospital, 300350 Tianjin, China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 6;24(6):162. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2406162. eCollection 2023 Jun.
The guidelines for evaluation and diagnosis of stable chest pain (SCP) released by American societies in 2021 (2021 GL) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) in 2019 both recommended the estimation of pretest probability (PTP) by ESC-PTP model. Further risk assessment for the low-risk group according to 2021 GL (ESC-PTP 15%) is important but still remains unclear. Thus, the present study intended to comprehensively investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in these low-risk patients.
From January 2017 to June 2019, we initially enrolled 8265 patients who were referred for CACS and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the assessment of SCP. PTP of each patient was estimated by ESC-PTP model. Patients with ESC-PTP 15% were finally included and followed up for major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and utilization of invasive procedures until June 2022. The degree of coronary artery disease (CAD) on CCTA was defined as no CAD (0%), nonobstructive CAD (1-49%) and obstructive CAD ( 50%). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards and Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively.
A total of 5183 patients with ESC-PTP 15% were identified and 1.6% experienced MACE during the 4-year follow-up. The prevalence of no CAD and obstructive CAD decreased and increased significantly ( 0.0001) in patients with higher CACS, respectively, and 62% had nonobstructive CAD among those with CACS 0, resulting in dramatically increasing ORs for any stenosis 50% and 0% across CACS strata. Higher CACS was also associated with an elevated risk of MACE (adjusted HR of 3.59, 13.47 and 6.58 when comparing CACS = 0-100, CACS 100 and CACS 0 to CACS = 0, respectively) and intensive utilization of invasive procedures.
In patients for whom subsequent testing should be deferred according to 2021 GL, high CACS conveyed a significant probability of substantial stenoses and clinical endpoints, respectively. These findings support the potential role of CACS as a further risk assessment tool to improve clinical management in these low-risk patients.
美国各学会于2021年发布的稳定型胸痛(SCP)评估与诊断指南(2021 GL)以及欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)于2019年发布的指南均推荐采用ESC - PTP模型评估验前概率(PTP)。根据2021 GL(ESC - PTP≤15%)对低风险组进行进一步风险评估很重要,但仍不明确。因此,本研究旨在全面调查冠状动脉钙化积分(CACS)在这些低风险患者中的诊断和预后价值。
2017年1月至2019年6月,我们最初纳入了8265例因SCP评估而接受CACS和冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)检查的患者。采用ESC - PTP模型评估每位患者的PTP。最终纳入ESC - PTP≤15%的患者,并随访至2022年6月,观察主要不良心血管事件(MACE)及侵入性操作的使用情况。CCTA上冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的程度定义为无CAD(0%)、非阻塞性CAD(1% - 49%)和阻塞性CAD(≥50%)。分别采用多变量Cox比例风险模型和Logistic回归模型计算调整后的风险比(HRs)和比值比(ORs)以及95%置信区间(CIs)。
共识别出5183例ESC - PTP≤15%的患者,在4年随访期间,1.6%的患者发生了MACE。CACS较高的患者中,无CAD和阻塞性CAD的患病率分别显著降低和升高(P<0.0001),CACS = 0的患者中有62%患有非阻塞性CAD,导致不同CACS分层中任何狭窄≥50%和≥0%的ORs显著增加。较高的CACS还与MACE风险升高(与CACS = 0相比,CACS = 0 - 100、CACS>100和CACS>0时调整后的HR分别为3.59、13.47和6.58)以及侵入性操作的大量使用相关。
对于根据2021 GL应推迟后续检查的患者,高CACS分别提示存在显著的严重狭窄和临床终点的可能性。这些发现支持CACS作为进一步风险评估工具在改善这些低风险患者临床管理中的潜在作用。