• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放归前与野生马鹿的肠道微生物差异:厚壁菌门丰度可能影响放归后的野外适应能力。

The gut microbial differences between pre-released and wild red deer: Firmicutes abundance may affect wild adaptation after release.

作者信息

Guo Jinhao, Li Zheng, Jin Yongchao, Sun Yue, Wang Binying, Liu Xinxin, Yuan Ziao, Zhang Weiqi, Zhang Changzhi, Zhang Minghai

机构信息

College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China.

College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2024 Jul 15;15:1401373. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1401373. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1401373
PMID:39077746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11284171/
Abstract

Insufficient density of red deer has affected the stability of forest ecosystems and the recovery of large carnivores (represented by Amur tiger). Conservation translocations from captivity to the wild has become an important way to restore the red deer populations. However, the difference in gut microbes between pre-release and wild red deer may affect the feeding adaptability of red deer after release. In this study, we clarified the differences in gut microbes between pre-released and wild red deer and screened the key gut microbes of the red deer involved in feeding by using metagenomic sequencing and feeding analysis. The results showed that the microbial difference between pre-released and wild red deer was mainly related to Firmicutes represented by Eubacteriales and Clostridia, and Firmicutes abundance in pre-released red deer (68.23%) was significantly lower than that of wild red deer (74.91%,  < 0.05). The expression of microbial metabolic pathways in pre-released red deer were significantly lower than those in wild red deer ( < 0.05), including carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, etc. The combinations of Firmicutes were significantly positively correlated with the intake of plant fiber and carbohydrate ( < 0.05), and were key microbes to help red deer deal with wild plant resources. Additionally, the combinations of Firmicutes represented by Eubacteriales and Clostridia lacking in pre-released red deer contributed the most to expression of microbial metabolic pathways ( > 1), showing a significant positive correlation ( < 0.05). This study indicates that high abundance of Firmicutes is an important guarantee for red deer to adapt to the wild feeding environment, which provides critical implications for the recovery of red deer populations and the protection of endangered ungulates.

摘要

马鹿种群密度不足已影响到森林生态系统的稳定性以及大型食肉动物(以东北虎为代表)的恢复。从圈养到野外的保护转移已成为恢复马鹿种群的重要途径。然而,放归前的马鹿与野生马鹿肠道微生物的差异可能会影响放归后马鹿的采食适应性。在本研究中,我们通过宏基因组测序和采食分析,阐明了放归前马鹿与野生马鹿肠道微生物的差异,并筛选出参与采食的马鹿关键肠道微生物。结果表明,放归前马鹿与野生马鹿的微生物差异主要与以真杆菌目和梭菌纲为代表的厚壁菌门有关,放归前马鹿的厚壁菌门丰度(68.23%)显著低于野生马鹿(74.91%,P<0.05)。放归前马鹿微生物代谢途径的表达显著低于野生马鹿(P<0.05),包括碳水化合物代谢、氨基酸代谢、聚糖生物合成与代谢等。厚壁菌门的组合与植物纤维和碳水化合物的摄入量显著正相关(P<0.05),是帮助马鹿应对野生植物资源的关键微生物。此外,放归前马鹿缺乏的以真杆菌目和梭菌纲为代表的厚壁菌门组合对微生物代谢途径表达的贡献最大(>1),呈显著正相关(P<0.05)。本研究表明,厚壁菌门的高丰度是马鹿适应野生采食环境的重要保障,这对马鹿种群的恢复和濒危有蹄类动物的保护具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/a61d8cf853ff/fmicb-15-1401373-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/8162b15ba01b/fmicb-15-1401373-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/269acf59f8f4/fmicb-15-1401373-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/c2bce43b01f7/fmicb-15-1401373-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/453ea2a7adf0/fmicb-15-1401373-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/269c87de3e0f/fmicb-15-1401373-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/7f9e6709f662/fmicb-15-1401373-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/a61d8cf853ff/fmicb-15-1401373-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/8162b15ba01b/fmicb-15-1401373-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/269acf59f8f4/fmicb-15-1401373-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/c2bce43b01f7/fmicb-15-1401373-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/453ea2a7adf0/fmicb-15-1401373-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/269c87de3e0f/fmicb-15-1401373-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/7f9e6709f662/fmicb-15-1401373-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ed2/11284171/a61d8cf853ff/fmicb-15-1401373-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
The gut microbial differences between pre-released and wild red deer: Firmicutes abundance may affect wild adaptation after release.放归前与野生马鹿的肠道微生物差异:厚壁菌门丰度可能影响放归后的野外适应能力。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jul 15;15:1401373. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1401373. eCollection 2024.
2
Diet-induced microbial adaptation process of red deer () under different introduced periods.不同引入时期下马鹿()的饮食诱导微生物适应过程
Front Microbiol. 2022 Oct 20;13:1033050. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1033050. eCollection 2022.
3
Marked variations in gut microbial diversity, functions, and disease risk between wild and captive alpine musk deer.高山麝的肠道微生物多样性、功能和疾病风险存在明显差异,野生和圈养个体之间存在差异。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023 Sep;107(17):5517-5529. doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12675-1. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
4
Comparative study of the function and structure of the gut microbiota in Siberian musk deer and Forest musk deer.比较研究西伯利亚麝香鹿和林麝的肠道微生物菌群的功能和结构。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022 Oct;106(19-20):6799-6817. doi: 10.1007/s00253-022-12158-9. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
5
Effects of vegetation type differences induced by human disturbance on the nutrition strategy and gut microbiota of Siberian roe deer.人为干扰引起的植被类型差异对狍营养策略及肠道微生物群的影响
Mol Ecol. 2023 May;32(10):2534-2550. doi: 10.1111/mec.16775. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
6
Comparative Analysis of the Gut Microbiota Composition between Captive and Wild Forest Musk Deer.圈养与野生林麝肠道微生物群组成的比较分析
Front Microbiol. 2017 Sep 5;8:1705. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01705. eCollection 2017.
7
Gut Microbiota of Wild and Captive Alpine Musk Deer ().野生和圈养高山麝的肠道微生物群()。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jan 21;10:3156. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03156. eCollection 2019.
8
Comparative analysis of gut microbial composition and potential functions in captive forest and alpine musk deer.圈养林麝和高山麝肠道微生物组成及功能的比较分析。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022 Feb;106(3):1325-1339. doi: 10.1007/s00253-022-11775-8. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
9
Marked Seasonal Variation in Structure and Function of Gut Microbiota in Forest and Alpine Musk Deer.林麝和马麝肠道微生物群结构与功能的显著季节性变化
Front Microbiol. 2021 Sep 6;12:699797. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.699797. eCollection 2021.
10
Growth Stages and Inter-Species Gut Microbiota Composition and Function in Captive Red Deer () and Blue Sheep ().圈养马鹿()和岩羊()的生长阶段及种间肠道微生物群组成与功能
Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 4;13(4):553. doi: 10.3390/ani13040553.

引用本文的文献

1
Variations in the Fecal Microbiota of Red Deer in Relation to the Hunting Area in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region, Italy.意大利弗留利-威尼斯朱利亚地区马鹿粪便微生物群与狩猎区域的关系
Animals (Basel). 2025 Aug 27;15(17):2517. doi: 10.3390/ani15172517.
2
Comparative analysis of the gut microbiota composition among three captive hornbills.三种圈养犀鸟肠道微生物群组成的比较分析。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Aug 7;16:1642332. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1642332. eCollection 2025.
3
Adaptive changes in the intestinal microbiota of giant pandas following reintroduction.

本文引用的文献

1
Progress in Research on the Gut Microflora of the Red Panda ().小熊猫肠道微生物群的研究进展
Microorganisms. 2024 Feb 27;12(3):478. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12030478.
2
Alterations in Fecal Microbiota Linked to Environment and Sex in Red Deer ().与马鹿环境和性别相关的粪便微生物群变化()。 (注:括号内容原文缺失,此处保留原文格式)
Animals (Basel). 2023 Mar 4;13(5):929. doi: 10.3390/ani13050929.
3
Effects of vegetation type differences induced by human disturbance on the nutrition strategy and gut microbiota of Siberian roe deer.人为干扰引起的植被类型差异对狍营养策略及肠道微生物群的影响
放归后大熊猫肠道微生物群的适应性变化
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 23;15(1):31014. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16136-9.
Mol Ecol. 2023 May;32(10):2534-2550. doi: 10.1111/mec.16775. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
4
Diet-induced microbial adaptation process of red deer () under different introduced periods.不同引入时期下马鹿()的饮食诱导微生物适应过程
Front Microbiol. 2022 Oct 20;13:1033050. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1033050. eCollection 2022.
5
Gut firmicutes: Relationship with dietary fiber and role in host homeostasis.肠道Firmicutes:与膳食纤维的关系及其在宿主稳态中的作用。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023 Nov;63(33):12073-12088. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2098249. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
6
Multi-omics reveals the positive leverage of plant secondary metabolites on the gut microbiota in a non-model mammal.多组学揭示了植物次生代谢物对非模式哺乳动物肠道微生物群的积极影响。
Microbiome. 2021 Sep 22;9(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01142-6.
7
Diet drives convergent evolution of gut microbiomes in bamboo-eating species.饮食驱动食竹物种的肠道微生物组趋同进化。
Sci China Life Sci. 2021 Jan;64(1):88-95. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1750-7. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
8
Impact of host intraspecies genetic variation, diet, and age on bacterial and fungal intestinal microbiota in tigers.宿主种内遗传变异、饮食和年龄对老虎肠道细菌和真菌微生物群的影响。
Microbiologyopen. 2020 Jul;9(7):e1050. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1050. Epub 2020 May 12.
9
Captivity causes taxonomic and functional convergence of gut microbial communities in bats.圈养导致蝙蝠肠道微生物群落的分类学和功能趋同。
PeerJ. 2019 Apr 30;7:e6844. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6844. eCollection 2019.
10
Characterization of the Gut Microbiota in Six Geographical Populations of Chinese Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta), Implying an Adaptation to High-Altitude Environment.中国恒河猴六个地理种群的肠道微生物特征,暗示了对高海拔环境的适应。
Microb Ecol. 2018 Aug;76(2):565-577. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1146-8. Epub 2018 Jan 25.