Suppr超能文献

初级保健自闭症筛查与后续自闭症诊断

Primary Care Autism Screening and Later Autism Diagnosis.

作者信息

Carbone Paul S, Campbell Kathleen, Wilkes Jacob, Stoddard Gregory J, Huynh Kelly, Young Paul C, Gabrielsen Terisa P

机构信息

Departments of Pediatrics and

Departments of Pediatrics and.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2020 Aug;146(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2314. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the proportion of children screened by the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT), identify characteristics associated with screen completion, and examine associations between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) screening and later ASD diagnosis.

METHODS

We examined data from children attending 18- and 24-month visits between 2013 and 2016 from 20 clinics within a health care system for evidence of screening with the M-CHAT and subsequent coding of ASD diagnosis at age >4.75 years. We interviewed providers for information about usual methods of M-CHAT scoring and ASD referral.

RESULTS

Of 36 233 toddlers, 73% were screened and 1.4% were later diagnosed with ASD. Hispanic children were less likely to be screened (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR]: 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-0.98), and family physicians were less likely to screen (APR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.09-0.15). Compared with unscreened children, screen-positive children were more likely to be diagnosed with ASD (APR: 10.3, 95% CI: 7.6-14.1) and were diagnosed younger (38.5 vs 48.5 months, < .001). The M-CHAT's sensitivity for ASD diagnosis was 33.1%, and the positive predictive value was 17.8%. Providers routinely omitted the M-CHAT follow-up interview and had uneven referral patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of children were screened for ASD, but disparities exist among those screened. Benefits for screen-positive children are improved detection and younger age of diagnosis. Performance of the M-CHAT can be improved in real-world health care settings by administering screens with fidelity and facilitating timely ASD evaluations for screen-positive children. Providers should continue to monitor for signs of ASD in screen-negative children.

摘要

目的

描述使用改良幼儿孤独症筛查量表(M-CHAT)进行筛查的儿童比例,确定与完成筛查相关的特征,并研究孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)筛查与后期ASD诊断之间的关联。

方法

我们检查了2013年至2016年间在一个医疗系统内20家诊所进行18个月和24个月就诊的儿童数据,以寻找使用M-CHAT进行筛查的证据以及随后对4.75岁以上儿童ASD诊断的编码。我们采访了医疗服务提供者,以获取有关M-CHAT评分和ASD转诊常用方法的信息。

结果

在36233名幼儿中,73%接受了筛查,1.4%后来被诊断为ASD。西班牙裔儿童接受筛查的可能性较小(调整患病率比[APR]:0.95,95%置信区间[CI]:0.92-0.98),家庭医生进行筛查的可能性较小(APR:0.12,95%CI:0.09-0.15)。与未筛查的儿童相比,筛查呈阳性的儿童更有可能被诊断为ASD(APR:10.3,95%CI:7.6-14.1),且诊断年龄更小(38.5个月对48.5个月,P<0.001)。M-CHAT对ASD诊断的敏感性为33.1%,阳性预测值为17.8%。医疗服务提供者经常省略M-CHAT后续访谈,转诊模式不均衡。

结论

大多数儿童接受了ASD筛查,但在接受筛查的儿童中存在差异。筛查呈阳性的儿童的好处是检测率提高和诊断年龄更小。在实际医疗环境中,通过准确实施筛查并为筛查呈阳性的儿童及时进行ASD评估,可以提高M-CHAT的性能。医疗服务提供者应继续监测筛查呈阴性儿童的ASD迹象。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验