Suppr超能文献

基于基因组学的药物反应评分可实现急性髓系白血病的精准治疗。

Pharmacogenomic Score Effectively Personalizes Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 1;30(19):4388-4396. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-0863.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Cytarabine (also known as ara-C) has been the backbone of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy for more than five decades. Recent pharmacogenomics-based 10-SNP ara-C (ACS10) scores showed low ACS10 (≤0) to be associated with poor outcomes in patients with AML treated with standard chemotherapy. Here, we evaluated the ACS10 score in the context of three different induction I regimens in patients with pediatric AML.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

ACS10 score groups (low, ≤0, or high, >0) were evaluated for association with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) by three randomized treatment arms in patients treated on the AML02 (NCT00136084) and AML08 (NCT00703820) clinical trials: AML02 low-dose ara-C (LDAC arm, n = 91), AML02 + AML08 high-dose ara-C (HDAC arm, n = 194), and AML08 clofarabine + ara-C (Clo/ara-C arm, n = 105) induction I regimens.

RESULTS

Within the low-ACS10 score (≤0) group, significantly improved EFS and OS were observed among patients treated with Clo/ara-C as compared with LDAC (EFS, HR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.88; P = 0.020; OS, HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.19-0.99; P = 0.048). In contrast, within the high-ACS10 score group (score >0), augmentation with Clo/ara-C was not favorable as compared with LDAC (Clo/ara-C vs. LDAC, EFS, HR = 1.95; 95% CI, 1.05-3.63; P = 0.035; OS, HR = 2.10; 95% CI, 0.96-4.59; P = 0.063). Personalization models predicted 9% improvement in the outcome in ACS10 score-based tailored induction (Clo/ara-C for low and LDAC for high-ACS10 score groups) as compared with nonpersonalized approaches (P < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that tailoring induction regimens using ACS10 scores can significantly improve outcomes in patients with AML. Given the SNPs are germline, preemptive genotyping can accelerate matching the most effective remission induction regimen.

摘要

目的

阿糖胞苷(也称为阿糖胞苷)作为急性髓细胞白血病(AML)化疗的基础已有五十多年的历史。最近基于药物基因组学的 10 个单核苷酸多态性阿糖胞苷(ACS10)评分显示,接受标准化疗的 AML 患者中,低 ACS10(≤0)与不良预后相关。在这里,我们在儿科 AML 患者的三种不同诱导 I 方案的背景下评估了 ACS10 评分。

实验设计

通过 AML02(NCT00136084)和 AML08(NCT00703820)临床试验中的三个随机治疗臂评估 ACS10 评分组(低,≤0 或高,>0)与事件无进展生存(EFS)和总生存(OS)的关系:AML02 低剂量阿糖胞苷(LDAC 臂,n = 91),AML02 + AML08 高剂量阿糖胞苷(HDAC 臂,n = 194)和 AML08 氯法拉滨+阿糖胞苷(Clo/ara-C 臂,n = 105)诱导 I 方案。

结果

在低 ACS10 评分(≤0)组中,与 LDAC 相比,接受 Clo/ara-C 治疗的患者的 EFS 和 OS 显著提高(EFS,HR = 0.45;95%CI,0.23-0.88;P = 0.020;OS,HR = 0.44;95%CI,0.19-0.99;P = 0.048)。相比之下,在高 ACS10 评分组(评分>0)中,与 LDAC 相比,Clo/ara-C 的增强效果不佳(Clo/ara-C 与 LDAC 相比,EFS,HR = 1.95;95%CI,1.05-3.63;P = 0.035;OS,HR = 2.10;95%CI,0.96-4.59;P = 0.063)。个性化模型预测,与非个性化方法相比(P <0.002),基于 ACS10 评分的定制诱导(低 ACS10 评分组用 Clo/ara-C,高 ACS10 评分组用 LDAC)可使 ACS10 评分的结果提高 9%。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,使用 ACS10 评分定制诱导方案可以显著改善 AML 患者的预后。鉴于 SNP 是种系的,预先进行基因分型可以加速匹配最有效的缓解诱导方案。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
How I treat pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.我如何治疗儿童急性髓系白血病。
Blood. 2021 Sep 23;138(12):1009-1018. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021011694.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验