Suppr超能文献

阿糖胞苷的药物基因组学与急性髓系白血病儿童及青年患者的预后

Cytarabine Pharmacogenomics and Outcomes Among Children and Young Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

作者信息

Marrero Richard J, Shastri Vivek M, Nicolet Deedra, Mrózek Krzysztof, Walker Christopher J, Blum William G, Powell Bayard L, Kolitz Jonathan E, Moore Joseph O, Uy Geoffrey L, Stock Wendy, Carroll Andrew J, Byrd John C, Aplenc Richard, Cooper Todd M, Gamis Alan S, Wu Huiyun, Pounds Stanley, Wang Yi-Cheng, Alonzo Todd A, Meshinchi Soheil, Eisfeld Ann-Kathrin, Kolb Edward A, Lamba Jatinder K

机构信息

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville.

The Clara D. Bloomfield Center for Leukemia Outcomes Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516296. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16296.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Therapeutic responses in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) demonstrate considerable variability both across and within established risk stratifications and age groups. Moreover, significant racial disparities persist, with Black patients experiencing inferior survival outcomes compared with their White counterparts.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the association of the previously reported 10 single nucleotide variant (SNV)-based ara-C pharmacogenomics score (ACS10) with survival outcomes in a large cohort of pediatric AML patients; to evaluate whether ACS10 remains relevant in an adolescent and young adult (AYA) population of patients with AML treated with similar intensive induction chemotherapy protocols; and to assess the association of ACS10 with race and treatment outcomes in both cohorts.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included patients from the Children's Oncology Group's AAML1031 trial, a multicenter, open-label randomized clinical trial that enrolled pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naive primary AML from June 2011 to July 2017 (aged 0 to 29.5 years) and from the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology frontline protocols, which included AYA patients from 9 different trials that enrolled patients with newly diagnosed AML from 1992 to 2010. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to March 2025.

EXPOSURES

Patients in the AAML1031 trial were randomized to 2 arms, standard chemotherapy alone or standard chemotherapy with the addition of bortezomib. Patients in the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology cohorts were treated with similar intensive induction chemotherapy protocols.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

ACS10 scores were evaluated for association with outcomes according to race, treatment arm, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) status.

RESULTS

The study included 1086 patients with AML. There were 717 patients from the pediatric AML cohort (median [range] age, 9.6 [0.04-29.2 years]; 379 [53%] male; 33 [5%] Asian, 84 [12%] Black, and 522 [73%] White) and 369 AYA patients with AML from the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology group (median [range] age, 30 [17-39] years; 196 [53%] male; 7 [2%] Asian, 32 [9%] Black, and 288 [78%] White). Within the standard treatment arm of AAML1031, patients in the low ACS10 group had significantly worse event-free survival (EFS) compared with those in the high ACS10 group (all patients: hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.05-1.95; P = .02; non-HSCT cohort: HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.06-2.07; P = .02). The ACS10 score remained significantly associated with EFS in multivariable analysis after adjusting for age, race, risk group and white blood cell count, within the standard treatment arm (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.03-2.02; P = .03). In the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology AYA non-HSCT cohort, the low ACS10 score group had significantly inferior overall survival (OS) and a higher point estimate for EFS compared with patients with a high ACS10 score (OS: HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.05-2.14; P = .03; EFS: HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.95-1.83; P = .10). A higher number of early deaths was observed in the low ACS10 group compared with the high ACS10 group, but the difference was not statistically significant (death within 30 days of treatment initiation: 6 of 112 [5%] vs 2 of 257 [1%]; P = .07). Across both cohorts, a low ACS10 score was significantly more abundant in Black patients compared with White patients (eg, in Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology cohort, 27 of 32 Black patients [84%] had low ACS10 scores compared with 64 of 288 White patients [22%]; P < .001) and inferior survival was observed in Black patients (eg, OS of Black compared with White patients in AAML1031 cohort: HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.02-2.13; P = .04). In the AAML1031 cohort, there were no significant differences in EFS or OS between Black and White patients receiving augmented treatment, suggesting that the addition of bortezomib was associated with benefit for Black patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study of 717 pediatric and 369 AYA patients with AML, the ACS10 score was associated with EFS in pediatric and AYA patients when treated with a standard induction regimen. There was a higher abundance of low ACS10 scores in Black patients, and Black patients treated with augmented therapy (ie, the addition of bortezomib) seemed to have improved outcomes. Integrating the ACS10 score into a prospective clinical trial to personalize induction therapy based on an individual's genetic profile has the potential to improve treatment outcomes.

摘要

重要性

急性髓系白血病(AML)的治疗反应在既定的风险分层和年龄组之间以及组内均表现出相当大的变异性。此外,显著的种族差异仍然存在,与白人患者相比,黑人患者的生存结果较差。

目的

在一大群儿科AML患者中验证先前报道的基于10个单核苷酸变异(SNV)的阿糖胞苷药物基因组学评分(ACS10)与生存结果的关联;评估在接受类似强化诱导化疗方案治疗的青少年和年轻成人(AYA)AML患者群体中,ACS10是否仍然相关;并评估ACS10与这两个队列中的种族和治疗结果的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究纳入了儿童肿瘤学组的AAML1031试验的患者,这是一项多中心、开放标签的随机临床试验,纳入了2011年6月至2017年新诊断、未接受过治疗的原发性AML儿科患者(年龄0至29.5岁),以及肿瘤临床试验联盟一线方案的患者,其中包括来自9项不同试验的AYA患者,这些试验纳入了1992年至2010年新诊断的AML患者。数据于2022年9月至2025年3月进行分析。

暴露因素

AAML1031试验中的患者被随机分为两组,一组仅接受标准化疗,另一组在标准化疗基础上加用硼替佐米。肿瘤临床试验联盟队列中的患者接受类似的强化诱导化疗方案治疗。

主要结局和测量指标

根据种族、治疗组和造血干细胞移植(HSCT)状态,评估ACS10评分与结局的关联。

结果

该研究纳入了1086例AML患者。儿科AML队列中有717例患者(中位[范围]年龄,9.6[0.04 - 29.2岁];379例[53%]为男性;33例[5%]为亚洲人,84例[12%]为黑人,522例[73%]为白人),肿瘤临床试验联盟组中有369例AYA AML患者(中位[范围]年龄,30[17 - 39]岁;196例[53%]为男性;7例[2%]为亚洲人,32例[9%]为黑人,288例[78%]为白人)。在AAML1031的标准化疗组中,低ACS10组患者的无事件生存期(EFS)明显低于高ACS10组患者(所有患者:风险比[HR],1.42;95%置信区间,1.05 - 1.95;P = 0.02;非HSCT队列:HR,1.48;95%置信区间,1.06 - 2.07;P = 0.02)。在标准化疗组中,调整年龄、种族、风险组和白细胞计数后,多变量分析显示ACS10评分与EFS仍显著相关(HR,1.44;95%置信区间,1.03 - 2.02;P = 0.03)。在肿瘤临床试验联盟AYA非HSCT队列中,低ACS10评分组的总生存期(OS)明显较差,EFS的点估计值高于高ACS10评分的患者(OS:HR,1.50;95%置信区间,1.05 - 2.14;P = 0.03;EFS:HR,1.32;95%置信区间,0.95 - 1.83;P = 0.10)。与高ACS10组相比,低ACS10组观察到的早期死亡人数更多,但差异无统计学意义(治疗开始后30天内死亡:112例中的6例[5%] vs 257例中的2例[1%];P = 0.07)。在两个队列中,与白人患者相比,黑人患者中低ACS10评分的比例明显更高(例如,在肿瘤临床试验联盟队列中,32例黑人患者中有27例[84%]的ACS10评分较低,而288例白人患者中有64例[22%];P < 0.001),并且黑人患者的生存较差(例如,AAML1031队列中黑人与白人患者的OS:HR,1.47;95%置信区间,1.02 - 2.13;P = 0.04)。在AAML1031队列中,接受强化治疗的黑人和白人患者在EFS或OS方面没有显著差异,这表明加用硼替佐米对黑人患者有益。

结论和意义

在这项对717例儿科和369例AYA AML患者的研究中,当采用标准诱导方案治疗时,ACS10评分与儿科和AYA患者的EFS相关。黑人患者中低ACS10评分的比例更高,接受强化治疗(即加用硼替佐米)的黑人患者似乎有更好的结局。将ACS10评分纳入前瞻性临床试验,根据个体的基因谱个性化诱导治疗,有可能改善治疗结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd78/12186577/1c80db3bc047/jamanetwopen-e2516296-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验