D'Adamo Christopher R, Troncoso Melissa R, Piedrahita Gabriela, Messing Joshua, Scott Jonathan M
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Nova Institute for Health, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Mil Med. 2025 Jan 16;190(1-2):e266-e272. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae367.
Unhealthy eating behaviors are adversely impacting the health and performance of the U.S. armed forces. Vegetable intake, in particular, has been shown to be far below recommended levels in active duty military populations. Previous research in other populations has shown that the addition of spices and herbs can help overcome numerous barriers to vegetable intake. The goal of this study was to determine modifiable barriers to vegetable intake among a sample of active duty military service members at Naval Support Activity Bethesda and evaluate whether the addition of spices and herbs can help surmount these barriers.
Monadic sensory testing was conducted that compared typical preparation (butter and salt) of 4 vegetables (broccoli, carrots, cauliflower, and kale) vs. otherwise identical preparation with the addition of spices and herbs. The Menu Item Survey, a 9-point hedonic scale utilized throughout the U.S. Military for recipe development, was the primary outcome of the vegetable sensory testing. Questionnaires were administered to assess barriers to military dining facility vegetable intake. Unpaired t-tests were utilized to compare Menu Item Survey ratings of typical vegetables vs. vegetables with spices and herbs. Descriptive statistics were computed to summarize the results of the barriers questionnaires, and qualitative analysis of open-ended questions was conducted to identify perceived areas of improved vegetable intake.
A diverse sample of 70 active duty service members participated in the vegetable sensory testing and provided outcome data. The most common barriers to military dining facility vegetable intake were appearance (42.9%), preparation style (41.3%), and taste (39.7%). Sensory testing revealed that vegetables with spices and herbs were preferred over typical preparations in overall appeal, flavor, and aroma (P <.03).
The addition of spices and herbs appears to help overcome key sensory-related barriers to military dining facility vegetable intake. Future comparison of vegetable intake with and without spices and herbs when included in a full meal in a military dining setting is warranted in order to better evaluate the effectiveness in increasing vegetable intake under typical dining conditions.
不健康的饮食行为正对美国武装部队的健康和表现产生不利影响。特别是,现役军人的蔬菜摄入量已被证明远低于推荐水平。先前针对其他人群的研究表明,添加香料和草药有助于克服蔬菜摄入的诸多障碍。本研究的目的是确定贝塞斯达海军支援活动中心现役军人样本中蔬菜摄入的可改变障碍,并评估添加香料和草药是否有助于克服这些障碍。
进行了单样本感官测试,比较了4种蔬菜(西兰花、胡萝卜、花椰菜和羽衣甘蓝)的典型烹饪方式(加黄油和盐)与添加香料和草药的相同烹饪方式。菜品调查问卷是美国军方在食谱开发中使用的9分享乐量表,是蔬菜感官测试的主要结果。发放问卷以评估军人就餐设施中蔬菜摄入的障碍。使用未配对t检验比较典型蔬菜与添加香料和草药蔬菜的菜品调查问卷评分。计算描述性统计数据以总结障碍问卷的结果,并对开放式问题进行定性分析以确定蔬菜摄入量改善的感知领域。
70名现役军人的多样化样本参与了蔬菜感官测试并提供了结果数据。军人就餐设施中蔬菜摄入最常见的障碍是外观(42.9%)、烹饪方式(41.3%)和味道(39.7%)。感官测试表明,添加香料和草药的蔬菜在整体吸引力、风味和香气方面比典型烹饪方式更受青睐(P <.03)。
添加香料和草药似乎有助于克服军人就餐设施中蔬菜摄入与感官相关的关键障碍。未来有必要在军事就餐环境中将添加和不添加香料和草药的蔬菜纳入正餐时进行蔬菜摄入量比较,以便更好地评估在典型就餐条件下增加蔬菜摄入量的有效性。