Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute: Sleep Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Sleep. 2024 Nov 8;47(11). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsae173.
Shiftwork is associated with cognitive impairment and reduced sleep time and quality, largely due to circadian misalignment. This study tested if circadian-informed lighting could improve cognitive performance and sleep during simulated night shifts versus dim control lighting.
Nineteen healthy participants (mean ± SD 29 ± 10 years, 12 males, 7 females) were recruited to a laboratory study consisting of two counterbalanced 8-day lighting conditions (order randomized) 1-month apart: (1) control lighting condition - dim, blue-depleted and (2) circadian-informed lighting condition - blue-enriched and blue-depleted where appropriate. Participants underwent an adaptation night (22:00-07:00 hours), then four nights of simulated night work (cognitive testing battery of nine tasks, 00:00-08:00 hours), and sleep during the day (10:00-19:00 hours). Psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) lapses, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) scores, and polysomnography-derived sleep outcomes were compared between conditions and across days using mixed models.
Significant condition-by-day-by-time of task interaction effects were found for PVT lapses, median reaction time, and reaction speed, with ~50% fewer lapses by the end of simulated shift work with circadian-informed lighting versus control (mean ± SD 7.4 ± 5.0 vs. 15.6 ± 6.1). KSS was lower around the night shift midpoints on days 6 and 7 with circadian versus control lighting. Participants slept 52 minutes longer [95% CIs: 27.5, 76.5 minutes] by day 7 with circadian-informed versus control lighting, p < .001. Effects were inconsistent on other performance tasks.
Circadian-informed lighting improved sleep, sleepiness, and vigilance compared to control lighting. These findings support the potential for lighting interventions to improve sleep and vigilance in night shift workers chronically exposed to dim lighting.
轮班工作与认知障碍和睡眠时间及质量减少有关,主要是由于昼夜节律失调。本研究旨在测试如果采用昼夜节律照明,可以改善模拟夜班期间的认知表现和睡眠,与昏暗的对照照明相比。
19 名健康参与者(平均年龄±标准差 29±10 岁,12 名男性,7 名女性)被招募到一项实验室研究中,该研究包括两种平衡的 8 天照明条件(随机顺序),间隔 1 个月:(1)对照照明条件-昏暗、蓝光减少;(2)昼夜节律照明条件-适当的蓝光富集和蓝光减少。参与者进行了一个适应夜间(22:00-07:00 小时),然后进行四个模拟夜间工作(认知测试九项任务,00:00-08:00 小时),以及白天睡眠(10:00-19:00 小时)。使用混合模型比较了条件之间和每天之间的警觉性任务失误、卡洛尔斯卡睡意量表(KSS)评分和多导睡眠图衍生的睡眠结果。
在警觉性任务失误、中值反应时间和反应速度方面,发现了显著的条件-天-任务时间交互效应,与对照相比,在模拟轮班工作结束时,警觉性任务失误减少了约 50%(平均值±标准差 7.4±5.0 与 15.6±6.1)。在第 6 天和第 7 天夜间工作中点左右,使用昼夜节律对照照明时,KSS 较低。与对照照明相比,使用昼夜节律照明时,参与者在第 7 天睡眠延长了 52 分钟[95%CI:27.5,76.5 分钟],p<.001。在其他性能任务上的效果不一致。
与对照照明相比,昼夜节律照明改善了睡眠、睡眠不足和警觉性。这些发现支持了照明干预在长期暴露于昏暗照明的夜班工人中改善睡眠和警觉性的潜力。