• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两次妊娠间隔时间与后续双胞胎妊娠不良围生结局的关系:一项全国性基于人群的研究。

Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes among subsequent twin pregnancies: a nationwide population-based study.

机构信息

Foshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China (Ye, Fan, Chen, Li, Rao, Zhou, Liu, Lin); Department of Obstetrics, Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China (Ye, Fan, Chen, Li, Rao, Zhou, Guo, Liu, Lin).

Medical Administration Division, People's Hospital of Huadu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (Huang).

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Sep;6(9):101439. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101439. Epub 2024 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101439
PMID:39079615
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The existing evidence on the association between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and pregnancy outcomes primarily focuses on singleton pregnancies, with limited research on twin pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the association between IPI and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

This population-based, retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the National Center for Health Statistics in the United States between 2016 and 2020. We included multiparous women aged 18 to 45 years with live-born twins without congenital anomalies, born between 26 and 42 weeks of gestation. Poisson regression models, adjusted for potential confounders, were used to evaluate the associations between IPI and adverse outcomes, including preterm birth (PTB) <36 weeks, small for gestational age (SGA), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, neonatal composite morbidity, and infant death. Missing data on covariates were managed using multiple imputations. Dose-response analyses were performed using the restricted cubic splines (RCS) approach. Subgroup analyses were stratified by maternal age, parity, and combination of neonatal sex. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using complete data and excluding pregnancies with intervening events during the IPI.

RESULTS

A total of 143,014 twin pregnancies were included in the analysis. Compared to the referent group (IPI of 18-23 months), an IPI of less than 6 months was associated with an increased risk of PTB<36 weeks (RR, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.17-1.25), SGA (RR, 1.11; 95% CI: 1.03-1.18), neonatal composite morbidity (RR, 1.19; 95% CI: 1.12-1.27), NICU admission (RR, 1.18; 95% CI: 1.14-1.22), and infant death (RR, 1.29; 95% CI: 1.05-1.60). An IPI of 5 years or more was associated with an increased risk of PTB<36 weeks (RR, 1.18; 95% CI: 1.15-1.21), SGA (RR, 1.24; 95% CI: 1.18-1.30), neonatal composite morbidity (RR, 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-1.15), and NICU admission (RR, 1.14; 95% CI: 1.11-1.17). The dose-response analyses showed that these outcomes had U-shaped or J-shaped associations with IPI. The associations between IPI and the outcomes slightly differed by advanced maternal age, parity, and combination of neonatal sex. The sensitivity analyses yielded similar results to the main findings.

CONCLUSION

Extreme IPI, less than 6 months or more than 5 years, was associated with adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies. IPI could be used as a predictor for risk stratification in high-risk twin pregnancies.

摘要

背景

现有关于孕中期间隔(IPI)与妊娠结局之间关联的证据主要集中在单胎妊娠,对双胎妊娠的研究有限。

目的

本研究旨在探讨 IPI 与双胎妊娠不良围产结局之间的关系。

研究设计

这是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,分析了美国国家卫生统计中心 2016 年至 2020 年的数据。我们纳入了年龄在 18 至 45 岁之间、孕龄在 26 至 42 周之间、无先天性异常的多胎活产儿的母亲。采用泊松回归模型,调整了潜在混杂因素,评估了 IPI 与不良结局(包括<36 周的早产(PTB)、小于胎龄儿(SGA)、新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院、新生儿复合发病率和婴儿死亡)之间的关联。使用多重插补处理协变量缺失数据。使用受限立方样条(RCS)方法进行剂量-反应分析。按母亲年龄、产次和新生儿性别组合进行亚组分析。使用完整数据进行敏感性分析,并排除 IPI 期间发生干预事件的妊娠。

结果

共有 143014 例双胎妊娠纳入分析。与参照组(IPI 为 18-23 个月)相比,IPI 小于 6 个月与<36 周的 PTB(RR,1.21;95%置信区间[95%CI]:1.17-1.25)、SGA(RR,1.11;95%CI:1.03-1.18)、新生儿复合发病率(RR,1.19;95%CI:1.12-1.27)、NICU 入院(RR,1.18;95%CI:1.14-1.22)和婴儿死亡(RR,1.29;95%CI:1.05-1.60)风险增加相关。IPI 为 5 年或更长时间与<36 周的 PTB(RR,1.18;95%CI:1.15-1.21)、SGA(RR,1.24;95%CI:1.18-1.30)、新生儿复合发病率(RR,1.10;95%CI:1.05-1.15)和 NICU 入院(RR,1.14;95%CI:1.11-1.17)风险增加相关。剂量-反应分析表明,这些结局与 IPI 呈 U 形或 J 形关联。IPI 与结局之间的关联在高龄产妇、产次和新生儿性别组合方面略有不同。敏感性分析得出的结果与主要发现相似。

结论

极短的 IPI(小于 6 个月)或过长的 IPI(大于 5 年)与双胎妊娠的不良结局相关。IPI 可作为高危双胎妊娠风险分层的预测指标。

相似文献

1
Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes among subsequent twin pregnancies: a nationwide population-based study.两次妊娠间隔时间与后续双胞胎妊娠不良围生结局的关系:一项全国性基于人群的研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Sep;6(9):101439. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101439. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
2
Effect of Interpregnancy Interval on Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Southern China: A Retrospective Cohort Study, 2000-2015.妊娠间隔对中国南方围产期不良结局的影响:一项2000 - 2015年的回顾性队列研究
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;32(2):131-140. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12432. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
3
Adverse Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes among Adolescent Pregnancies in the United States.美国青少年妊娠的围产期和新生儿不良结局。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e2495-e2504. doi: 10.1055/a-2121-7698. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
4
Twin pregnancy following a short interpregnancy interval: Maternal and neonatal outcomes.双胎妊娠在短间隔妊娠后:母婴结局。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Sep;276:185-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.026. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
5
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus.妊娠期糖尿病合并双胎妊娠的母婴结局。
Endocrine. 2024 May;84(2):388-398. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03588-0. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
6
Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin and singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.妊娠糖尿病与双胎和单胎妊娠中母婴围生期不良结局的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Feb;230(2):213-225. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
7
Interpregnancy interval after live birth or pregnancy termination and estimated risk of preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study.活产或终止妊娠后的妊娠间隔与早产的估计风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2016 Nov;123(12):2009-2017. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14165. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
8
Association between interpregnancy interval and maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in women with a cesarean delivery: a population-based study.剖宫产术后再次妊娠间隔与母婴不良结局的相关性:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 25;23(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05600-x.
9
Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnancies following miscarriages or induced abortions in Norway (2008-2016): A cohort study.挪威(2008-2016 年)流产或人工流产后妊娠的孕次间隔与不良妊娠结局:一项队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Nov 22;19(11):e1004129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004129. eCollection 2022 Nov.
10
Interpregnancy intervals and adverse birth outcomes in high-income countries: An international cohort study.高收入国家的妊娠间隔与不良出生结局:一项国际队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 19;16(7):e0255000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255000. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between inter-pregnancy interval and risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in subsequent twin pregnancies.再次妊娠间隔与后续双胎妊娠中不良孕产妇和新生儿结局风险之间的关系。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Aug 1;25(1):805. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07935-z.
2
Non-linear association between interpregnancy interval after vaginal delivery and singleton preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study.经阴道分娩后妊娠间隔与单胎早产之间的非线性关联:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 11;25(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07373-x.