Zhang Lifang, Shen Songying, He Jianrong, Chan Fanfan, Lu Jinhua, Li Weidong, Wang Ping, Lam Kin Bong H, Mol Ben W J, Yeung Shiu Lun A, Xia Huimin, Schooling C Mary, Qiu Xiu
Division of Birth Cohort Study, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Woman and Child Health Care, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;32(2):131-140. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12432. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
In January 2016, a universal two-child policy was introduced in China. The association of interpregnancy interval (IPI) with perinatal outcomes has not previously been assessed among Chinese population. We investigated the effect of IPI after live birth on the risks of preterm delivery, and small, and large for gestational age births in China.
We conducted a cohort study among 227 352 Chinese women with their first and second delivery during 2000 to 2015. IPI was calculated as months from first live delivery to conception of the second pregnancy. Poisson regression models with robust variance were fit to evaluate associations of IPI with risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, adjusted for potential confounders.
Compared to IPI of 24- <30 months, IPI <18 months was associated with higher risks of preterm birth (PTB) and small for gestational age (SGA). For IPI <6 months, the adjusted relative risks (RR) for PTB and SGA were 2.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83, 2.27) and 1.43 (95% CI 1.31, 1.57), respectively. Women with IPI ≥60 months had higher risks of PTB and large for gestational age (LGA). For IPI ≥120 months, the adjusted RRs for PTB and LGA were 1.67 (95% CI 1.43, 1.94) and 1.10 (95% CI 0.97, 1.26).
Women with IPI <18 months after live birth had higher risk of PTB and SGA, and IPI ≥60 months was associated with higher risk of PTB and LGA. These findings may provide information to Chinese couples about the appropriate interpregnancy interval for a second pregnancy.
2016年1月,中国开始实施普遍二孩政策。此前尚未在中国人群中评估妊娠间隔(IPI)与围产期结局之间的关联。我们调查了活产后的IPI对中国早产、小于胎龄儿和大于胎龄儿出生风险的影响。
我们对2000年至2015年期间首次和第二次分娩的227352名中国女性进行了一项队列研究。IPI计算为从第一次活产到第二次怀孕受孕的月数。采用具有稳健方差的泊松回归模型来评估IPI与不良围产期结局风险之间的关联,并对潜在混杂因素进行了调整。
与24至<30个月的IPI相比,<18个月的IPI与早产(PTB)和小于胎龄儿(SGA)的风险较高有关。对于<6个月的IPI,PTB和SGA的调整后相对风险(RR)分别为2.04(95%置信区间[CI]1.83,2.27)和1.43(95%CI1.31,1.57)。IPI≥60个月的女性发生PTB和大于胎龄儿(LGA)的风险较高。对于IPI≥120个月,PTB和LGA的调整后RR分别为1.67(95%CI1.43,1.94)和1.10(95%CI0.97,1.26)。
活产后IPI<18个月的女性发生PTB和SGA的风险较高,而IPI≥60个月与PTB和LGA的风险较高有关。这些发现可能为中国夫妇提供关于第二次怀孕合适妊娠间隔的信息。