Suppr超能文献

一项关于酮洛芬缓释片与普通酮洛芬胶囊治疗骨关节炎患者的双盲交叉研究。

A double-blind, crossover study of a sustained-release tablet of ketoprofen and normal ketoprofen capsules in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Toft B, Christophersen J, Christensen N, Hesselsøe G, Mikkelsen S, Aaboe T, Mose K, Thorsager T, Jakobsen G

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1985;9(10):708-12. doi: 10.1185/03007998509109655.

Abstract

A double-blind, crossover study was carried out to assess the efficacy and tolerance of a sustained-release tablet formulation of ketoprofen given as a single daily 200 mg dose compared with 2 X 50 mg normal formulation capsules of ketoprofen twice daily. Eighty-four patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee were admitted and received treatment for periods of 3 weeks, preceded by a 1-week placebo wash-out period, with each of the two formulations, in random order. Patients were seen after each study period and clinical objective and subjective assessments made of signs and symptoms of the disease, consumption of rescue analgesic and unwanted effects. Forty-eight of the patients continued, mainly on the sustained-release formulation, in an open long-term tolerance study lasting 3 months. The results were analyzed for 68 patients who completed the double-blind phase and for 33 who completed the open phase of the study. The patients who were withdrawn did so mainly for non-drug related reasons; 19 patients did so because of gastric disorders during the first phase. The incidence of side-effects was low and similar in frequency and nature with both formulations; those that were reported were mild and principally gastro-intestinal. Both active treatment periods afforded similar symptomatic relief and were preferred to placebo by all but 2 patients. No significant differences were found between active treatments, although there was a trend in favour of the sustained-release formulation for most of the parameters studied as there was in patient preference.

摘要

开展了一项双盲交叉研究,以评估每日单次服用200毫克酮洛芬缓释片制剂与每日两次服用2×50毫克酮洛芬普通制剂胶囊的疗效和耐受性。84例髋部和/或膝部骨关节炎患者入院,在为期1周的安慰剂洗脱期后,随机顺序接受两种制剂各为期3周的治疗。在每个研究期结束后对患者进行检查,并对疾病的体征和症状、急救镇痛药的使用情况及不良反应进行临床客观和主观评估。48例患者继续参与了一项为期3个月的开放性长期耐受性研究,主要使用缓释制剂。对完成双盲阶段的68例患者和完成研究开放阶段的33例患者的结果进行了分析。退出研究的患者主要是出于与药物无关的原因;19例患者在第一阶段因胃部疾病退出。两种制剂的副作用发生率都很低,在频率和性质上相似;报告的副作用都很轻微,主要是胃肠道方面的。两个积极治疗期都提供了相似的症状缓解,除2例患者外,所有患者都更喜欢积极治疗而非安慰剂。两种积极治疗之间未发现显著差异,尽管在大多数研究参数方面有支持缓释制剂的趋势,患者偏好方面也是如此。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验