Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Division of Geriatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ethn Health. 2024 Nov;29(8):946-962. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2024.2385110. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
We urgently need to understand Alzheimer's disease (AD) stigma among Black adults. Black communities bear a disproportionate burden of AD, and recent advances in early diagnosis using AD biomarkers may affect stigma associated with AD. The goal of our study is to characterize AD stigma within our cohort of self-identified Black participants and test how AD biomarker test results may affect this stigma.
We surveyed a sample of 1,150 self-identified Black adults who were randomized to read a vignette describing a fictional person, who was described as either having a positive or negative biomarker test result. After reading the vignette, participants completed the modified (FS-ADS). We compared FS-ADS scores between groups defined by age, gender, and United States Census region. We examined interactions between these groupings and AD biomarker test result.
Participants over age 65 had lower scores (lower stigma) on all 7 FS-ADS domains compared to those under 65: and . In the biomarker positive condition, worries about were greater than in the biomarker negative condition and statistically similar in the two age groups (DOR, 0.39 [95%CI, 0.22-0.69]). This pattern of results was similar for (DOR, 0.51 [95%CI, 0.28-0.90]).
While older adults reported less AD stigma than younger adults, AD biomarker testing caused similarly high concerns about structural discrimination and negative severity attributions. Thus, use of AD biomarker diagnosis may increase AD stigma and exacerbate healthcare disparities known to effect AD diagnosis in some Black adults. Advances in AD diagnosis may interact with social and structural factors to differentially affect groups of Black adults.
我们迫切需要了解黑人成年人中阿尔茨海默病(AD)的耻辱感。黑人社区承担着 AD 的不成比例的负担,而最近使用 AD 生物标志物进行早期诊断的进展可能会影响与 AD 相关的耻辱感。我们研究的目标是描述我们的自报黑人参与者队列中的 AD 耻辱感,并测试 AD 生物标志物测试结果如何影响这种耻辱感。
我们调查了 1150 名自报黑人成年人的样本,他们被随机分配阅读描述一个虚构人物的小插曲,该人物被描述为具有阳性或阴性生物标志物测试结果。阅读小插曲后,参与者完成了修改后的(FS-ADS)。我们比较了按年龄、性别和美国人口普查区域分组的 FS-ADS 评分。我们研究了这些分组与 AD 生物标志物测试结果之间的相互作用。
与 65 岁以下的人相比,65 岁以上的人在所有 7 个 FS-ADS 领域的得分(耻辱感较低)较低: 和 。在生物标志物阳性的情况下,对 的担忧大于生物标志物阴性的情况,并且在两个年龄组中统计学上相似(优势比,0.39 [95%CI,0.22-0.69])。对于 (优势比,0.51 [95%CI,0.28-0.90]),这种结果模式相似。
虽然老年人比年轻人报告的 AD 耻辱感要低,但 AD 生物标志物测试导致了对结构性歧视和负面严重程度归因的同样高的担忧。因此,AD 生物标志物诊断的使用可能会增加 AD 耻辱感,并加剧已知对一些黑人成年人 AD 诊断产生影响的医疗保健差异。AD 诊断的进步可能会与社会和结构因素相互作用,从而对不同的黑人成年人群体产生影响。