Costa Simone, Ferros Catarina, Reigota Ana, Tourais Isabel, Marques Margarida, Lopes João, Afreixo Vera, Cabral Luís
Intensive Care Medicine, Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, PRT.
Anesthesiology, Centro Hospitalar Tondela Viseu (CHTV), Viseu, PRT.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 30;16(6):e63502. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63502. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Managing burn patients is a challenge requiring a multidisciplinary team with the ability to predict complications and act early to avoid them. There are few studies characterizing the population of critically ill burn patients in need of ventilatory support. This study aimed to describe the population of burn patients in need of invasive mechanical ventilation support and assess in-hospital mortality and the factors associated with it.
A longitudinal retrospective study was conducted, including burn patients admitted to a tertiary hospital burn unit over five consecutive years, who required invasive mechanical ventilation support during their hospitalization. Demographic data, comorbidities, characteristics of the injury scene, etiology, and characteristics of the burn were collected. Length of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization as well as mortality rate were evaluated. The determination of mortality predictors and the prognostic performance of mortality prediction scores were analyzed. A one-year follow-up was performed to evaluate the survival of discharged patients.
A total of 141 patients were included in this study; 68.1% patients were male with a median age of 58 years. The mean percentage of total body surface area (TBSA) burned was 24.5%. Home incidents were the most frequent, and fire was the most common cause of burns (80.9% of patients). The mean Abbreviated Burn Severity Index Score (ABSI) was 7.83, with an area under the curve in receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis (AUC_ROC) of 0.725; the mean Belgium Outcome of Burn Injury (BOBI) score was 3.45, with AUC_ROC of 0.740 and mean R-Baux of 89.1 and AUC_ROC of 0.834. The mean duration of invasive mechanical ventilation was 16.9±19.3 days. Age (p<0.001), length of mechanical ventilation (p<0.001), length of hospitalization (p<0.001), higher degree of burn (p=0.001), TBSA (p=0.040), and the presence of buttock burn (0.006) were associated with mortality in this sample. In-hospital mortality was 29.8%. The survival group had a 12% death rate at one-year follow-up, mostly in the first three months after discharge.
Age, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospitalization, higher degree of burn, TBSA, and the presence of buttock burn were associated with mortality in this sample. R-Baux score was the most accurate test score to predict mortality in this challenging group of patients.
管理烧伤患者是一项挑战,需要一个多学科团队,该团队要有能力预测并发症并尽早采取行动以避免并发症。很少有研究对需要通气支持的重症烧伤患者群体进行特征描述。本研究旨在描述需要有创机械通气支持的烧伤患者群体,并评估院内死亡率及其相关因素。
进行了一项纵向回顾性研究,纳入连续五年入住一家三级医院烧伤科且住院期间需要有创机械通气支持的烧伤患者。收集了人口统计学数据、合并症、受伤现场特征、病因以及烧伤特征。评估了机械通气时长、住院时长以及死亡率。分析了死亡率预测指标的确定情况以及死亡率预测评分的预后性能。对出院患者进行了为期一年的随访以评估其生存情况。
本研究共纳入141例患者;68.1%的患者为男性,中位年龄为58岁。总体表面积(TBSA)烧伤的平均百分比为24.5%。家庭事故最为常见,火灾是烧伤最常见的原因(80.9%的患者)。平均简略烧伤严重程度指数评分(ABSI)为7.83,在受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析中的曲线下面积(AUC_ROC)为0.725;平均比利时烧伤损伤结局(BOBI)评分为3.45,AUC_ROC为0.740,平均R - 博克斯评分为89.1,AUC_ROC为0.834。有创机械通气的平均时长为16.9±19.3天。年龄(p<0.001)、机械通气时长(p<0.001)、住院时长(p<0.001)、烧伤程度较高(p = 0.001)、TBSA(p = 0.040)以及臀部烧伤的存在(0.006)与本样本中的死亡率相关。院内死亡率为29.8%。生存组在一年随访时有12%的死亡率,大多发生在出院后的前三个月。
在本样本中,年龄、机械通气时长、住院时长、烧伤程度较高、TBSA以及臀部烧伤的存在与死亡率相关。R - 博克斯评分是预测这一具有挑战性患者群体死亡率最准确的测试评分。