Anusavice K J
Dent Clin North Am. 1985 Oct;29(4):789-803.
A review of the comparative characteristics and properties of noble metal alloys used for metal-ceramic restorations has been presented. Selection of an alloy for one's practice should be based on long-term clinical data, physical properties, esthetic potential, and laboratory data on metal-ceramic bond strength and thermal compatibility with commercial dental porcelains. Although gold-based alloys, such as the Au-Pt-Pd, Au-Pd-Ag, and Au-Pd classes, may appear to be costly compared with the palladium-based alloys, they have clearly established their clinical integrity and acceptability over an extended period of time. Other than the relatively low sag resistance of the high gold-low silver content alloys and the potential thermal incompatibility with some commercial porcelain products, few clinical failures have been observed. The palladium-based alloys are less costly than the gold-based alloys. Palladium-silver alloys require extra precautions to minimize porcelain discoloration. Palladium-copper and palladium-cobalt alloys may also cause porcelain discoloration, as copper and cobalt are used as colorants in glasses. The palladium-cobalt alloys are least susceptible to high-temperature creep compared with all classes of noble metals. Nevertheless, insufficient clinical data exist to advocate the general use of the palladium-copper and palladium-cobalt alloys at the present time. One should base the selection and use of these alloys in part on their ability to meet the requirements of the ADA Acceptance Program. A list of acceptable or provisionally acceptable alloys is available from the American Dental Association and is published annually in the Journal of the American Dental Association. Dentists have the legal and ethical responsibility for selection of alloys used for cast restorations. This responsibility should not be delegated to the dental laboratory technician. It is advisable to discuss the criteria for selection of an alloy with the technician and the thermal manufacturer or supplier. Once an alloy is selected, the specific alloy name should be written on all laboratory prescriptions as well as in patients' charts. Maintenance of accurate dental records is necessary from a legal point of view, and it also allows the clinician to determine the longevity of specific metal-porcelain systems.
本文对用于金属烤瓷修复体的贵金属合金的比较特性和性能进行了综述。为临床实践选择合金应基于长期临床数据、物理性能、美学潜力以及关于金属与烤瓷结合强度和与商用牙科瓷热相容性的实验室数据。尽管与钯基合金相比,金基合金(如Au-Pt-Pd、Au-Pd-Ag和Au-Pd类)可能看起来成本较高,但它们在很长一段时间内已明确确立了其临床完整性和可接受性。除了高金低银含量合金的抗下垂性相对较低以及与某些商用瓷产品可能存在热不相容性外,很少观察到临床失败情况。钯基合金比金基合金成本更低。钯银合金需要额外注意以尽量减少瓷变色。钯铜合金和钯钴合金也可能导致瓷变色,因为铜和钴在玻璃中用作着色剂。与所有类别的贵金属相比,钯钴合金最不易发生高温蠕变。然而,目前尚无足够的临床数据支持普遍使用钯铜合金和钯钴合金。在选择和使用这些合金时,部分应基于它们满足ADA验收计划要求的能力。美国牙科协会可提供可接受或临时可接受合金的清单,该清单每年发表在《美国牙科协会杂志》上。牙医对用于铸造修复体的合金选择负有法律和道德责任。此责任不应委托给牙科实验室技术人员。建议与技术人员以及烤瓷制造商或供应商讨论合金选择标准。一旦选择了合金,应在所有实验室处方以及患者病历中写明具体合金名称。从法律角度来看,保持准确的牙科记录是必要的,这也使临床医生能够确定特定金属烤瓷系统的使用寿命。