• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

半月板撕裂治疗中手术的成本与时机

Costs and Timing of Surgery in the Management of Meniscal Tears.

作者信息

Nin Darren Z, Chen Ya-Wen, Mandalia Krishna, Parman Michael, Shah Sarav S, Ramappa Arun J, Chang David C, Matzkin Elizabeth G

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jul 29;12(7):23259671241257881. doi: 10.1177/23259671241257881. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.1177/23259671241257881
PMID:39081877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11287724/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment strategies for meniscal tears range from nonoperative management to surgical intervention. However, national trends in cost-related outcomes and patient factors related to the failure of nonoperative management remain poorly understood.

PURPOSE

To describe the costs associated with nonoperative versus operative management of meniscal tears in the 2 years after diagnosis and examine the relationship between patient characteristics and timing of surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This study was conducted using the MarketScan databases. Patients diagnosed with a meniscal tear without concomitant knee osteoarthritis between January 1 and December 31, 2017, were included. The primary outcome was the total cost of meniscal tear-related procedures-including insurance deductibles, coinsurance, and net insurance payments-in the 2 years after diagnosis. Procedures included were as follows: (1) surgery-including meniscectomy or meniscal repair; (2) physical therapy; (3) medication-including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, opioids, and acetaminophen; (4) intra-articular injections-including professional fee, hyaluronic acid, and corticosteroids; (5) imaging; and (6) clinic visits to orthopaedic specialists. Patients were grouped as having undergone early surgery (ES) (≤3 months of diagnosis), late surgery (LS) (>3 months after diagnosis), or no surgery (NS). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the likelihood of undergoing surgery early and failing nonoperative treatment.

RESULTS

The study population included 29,924 patients with a mean age of 43.9 ± 12.9 years (ES: n = 9507 (31.8%); LS: n = 2021 (6.8%); NS: n = 18,396 (61.5%)). Complex (36.6%) and medial (58.8%) meniscal tears were the most common type and location of injuries, respectively. The mean cost of management per patient was $3835 ± $4795. Costs were lower in the NS group ($1905 ± $3175) compared with the ES group ($6759 ± $5155), while the highest costs were observed in the LS group ($7649 ± $5913) ( < .001). Patients who were men, >40 years, and with a bucket-handle or lateral meniscal tear were more likely to undergo surgery early. Patients who were men, <30 years, and with a complex tear or tear to the lateral meniscus were more likely to fail nonoperative management.

CONCLUSION

Nonoperative management had the lowest cost burden and should be recommended for patients with appropriate indications. However, if surgery is necessary, it should be performed earlier.

摘要

背景

半月板撕裂的治疗策略涵盖从非手术治疗到手术干预。然而,与成本相关的结果的全国趋势以及与非手术治疗失败相关的患者因素仍知之甚少。

目的

描述诊断后2年内半月板撕裂非手术治疗与手术治疗的相关成本,并研究患者特征与手术时机之间的关系。

研究设计

横断面研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

本研究使用MarketScan数据库。纳入2017年1月1日至12月31日期间诊断为半月板撕裂且无膝关节骨关节炎的患者。主要结局是诊断后2年内与半月板撕裂相关的手术总成本,包括保险免赔额、共付额和保险净支付额。包括的手术如下:(1)手术,包括半月板切除术或半月板修复术;(2)物理治疗;(3)药物治疗,包括非甾体类抗炎药、阿片类药物和对乙酰氨基酚;(4)关节内注射,包括专业费用、透明质酸和皮质类固醇;(5)影像学检查;(6)骨科专家门诊就诊。患者分为接受早期手术(ES)(诊断后≤3个月)、晚期手术(LS)(诊断后>3个月)或未手术(NS)。进行多因素逻辑回归以确定早期手术和非手术治疗失败的可能性。

结果

研究人群包括29924例患者,平均年龄43.9±12.9岁(ES组:n = 9507例(31.8%);LS组:n = 2021例(6.8%);NS组:n = 18396例(61.5%))。复杂半月板撕裂(36.6%)和内侧半月板撕裂(58.8%)分别是最常见的损伤类型和部位。每位患者的平均治疗成本为3835±4795美元。与ES组(6759±5155美元)相比,NS组成本较低(1905±3175美元),而LS组成本最高(7649±5913美元)(P <.001)。男性、年龄>40岁、桶柄状或外侧半月板撕裂的患者更有可能早期接受手术。男性、年龄<30岁、复杂撕裂或外侧半月板撕裂的患者更有可能非手术治疗失败。

结论

非手术治疗成本负担最低,对于有适当指征的患者应推荐。然而,如果需要手术,应尽早进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e93f/11287724/14bb84f4f7cc/10.1177_23259671241257881-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e93f/11287724/afbf5de77f42/10.1177_23259671241257881-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e93f/11287724/14bb84f4f7cc/10.1177_23259671241257881-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e93f/11287724/afbf5de77f42/10.1177_23259671241257881-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e93f/11287724/14bb84f4f7cc/10.1177_23259671241257881-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Costs and Timing of Surgery in the Management of Meniscal Tears.半月板撕裂治疗中手术的成本与时机
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jul 29;12(7):23259671241257881. doi: 10.1177/23259671241257881. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Secondary Meniscal Tears in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Relationship Among Operative Management, Osteoarthritis, and Arthroplasty at 18-Year Mean Follow-up.前交叉韧带损伤患者的半月板二次撕裂:18 年平均随访时手术治疗、骨关节炎和关节置换的关系。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jun;47(7):1583-1590. doi: 10.1177/0363546519844481.
3
Comparable Outcomes After Bucket-Handle Meniscal Repair and Vertical Meniscal Repair Can Be Achieved at a Minimum 2 Years' Follow-up.在至少2年的随访中,桶柄状半月板修复和垂直半月板修复可获得相似的结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;45(13):3104-3110. doi: 10.1177/0363546517719244. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
4
Comparative Outcomes of Radial and Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tear Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.径向与桶柄状半月板撕裂修复的对比结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2653-2660. doi: 10.1177/0363546518786035. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
5
Arthroscopic lavage and debridement for osteoarthritis of the knee: an evidence-based analysis.膝关节骨关节炎的关节镜灌洗与清创术:一项循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(12):1-37. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
6
Surgical Outcomes After Bucket-Handle Meniscal Repairs: Analysis of a Large Contained Cohort.Bucket-Handle 半月板修复术后的手术结果:大型封闭队列分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jul;50(9):2390-2396. doi: 10.1177/03635465221101136. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
7
Self-Reduction of Displaced Bucket-Handle Medial Meniscal Tear in a 71-Year-Old Patient: A Case Report.71岁患者移位桶柄状内侧半月板撕裂的自行复位:一例报告
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015 Dec;6(4):334-7. doi: 10.1177/2151458515605565.
8
Meniscus Root Repair vs Meniscectomy or Nonoperative Management to Prevent Knee Osteoarthritis After Medial Meniscus Root Tears: Clinical and Economic Effectiveness.半月板根修复与半月板切除术或非手术治疗预防内侧半月板根撕裂后膝关节骨关节炎的临床和经济效果。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):762-769. doi: 10.1177/0363546518755754. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
9
Costs of Nonoperative Procedures for Knee Osteoarthritis in the Year Prior to Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.初次全膝关节置换术前 1 年膝关节骨关节炎非手术治疗的成本。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Oct 5;104(19):1697-1702. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01415. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
10
Outcomes After the Operative Treatment of Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears in Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年桶柄状半月板撕裂手术治疗后的结果
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jan 15;7(1):2325967118820305. doi: 10.1177/2325967118820305. eCollection 2019 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the efficacy of precise platelet-rich plasma injection in grade II meniscus tears.评估精准注射富血小板血浆治疗Ⅱ级半月板撕裂的疗效。
Int J Burns Trauma. 2025 Jun 15;15(3):133-142. doi: 10.62347/JZYC7897. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Which meniscus injuries require surgery?哪些半月板损伤需要手术治疗?
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2022 Mar 22;142(5). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.21.0540.
2
Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy versus Physical Therapy for Degenerative Meniscal Tear: a Systematic Review.关节镜下半月板部分切除术与物理治疗退行性半月板撕裂:系统评价。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Nov 22;36(45):e292. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e292.
3
Which factors are associated with the prevalence of meniscal repair?哪些因素与半月板修复的患病率相关?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Mar 22;22(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04107-w.
4
Traumatic Meniscal Tears Are Associated With Meniscal Degeneration.创伤性半月板撕裂与半月板退变有关。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Aug;48(10):2345-2352. doi: 10.1177/0363546520934766. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
5
Management of traumatic meniscus tears: the 2019 ESSKA meniscus consensus.创伤性半月板撕裂的处理:2019 年 ESSKA 半月板共识。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr;28(4):1177-1194. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05847-3. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
6
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Isolated Meniscal Repair Versus Partial Meniscectomy for Red-Red Zone, Vertical Meniscal Tears in the Young Adult.青年红-红区垂直型半月板撕裂行半月板修复术与半月板部分切除术的成本效果分析
Arthroscopy. 2019 Dec;35(12):3280-3286. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.06.026.
7
Five-Year Outcome of Operative and Nonoperative Management of Meniscal Tear in Persons Older Than Forty-Five Years.四十五岁以上人群半月板撕裂手术与非手术治疗的五年随访结果。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;72(2):273-281. doi: 10.1002/art.41082. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
8
The Natural History of Meniscus Tears.半月板撕裂的自然史
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Jul;39(Issue 6, Supplement 1 Suppl 1):S53-S55. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001386.
9
Effect of Early Surgery vs Physical Therapy on Knee Function Among Patients With Nonobstructive Meniscal Tears: The ESCAPE Randomized Clinical Trial.非结构性半月板撕裂患者早期手术与物理治疗对膝关节功能的影响:ESCAPE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Oct 2;320(13):1328-1337. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13308.
10
Conservative management of a traumatic meniscal injury utilising osteopathy and exercise rehabilitation: A case report.运用整骨疗法和运动康复对创伤性半月板损伤进行保守治疗:一例病例报告。
Complement Ther Med. 2017 Aug;33:27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 Jun 3.