• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Bucket-Handle 半月板修复术后的手术结果:大型封闭队列分析。

Surgical Outcomes After Bucket-Handle Meniscal Repairs: Analysis of a Large Contained Cohort.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, California, USA.

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jul;50(9):2390-2396. doi: 10.1177/03635465221101136. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1177/03635465221101136
PMID:35647901
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Representing approximately 10% of all meniscal tears, bucket-handle meniscal tears (BHMTs) are large longitudinal vertical tears that have an attached fragment flipped into the intercondylar notch. Meniscectomy often results in significant meniscal loss and increased joint loading. Alternatively, meniscal repair attempts to restore the function of the meniscus and aims to preserve joint mechanics.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery in patients who underwent a bucket-handle meniscal repair (BHMR), and to assess risk factors associated with subsequent knee surgical intervention.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

We performed an electronic health record search for all patients aged 12 to 65 years who underwent arthroscopic knee meniscal repairs for BHMT (2011-2018). We excluded patients who had a previous BHMR, did not have magnetic resonance imaging of the knee within 60 days before BHMR, lacked active membership in Kaiser insurance in the year before and after BHMR, or underwent meniscectomy before BHMR. All patients were followed until December 31, 2019, with censoring at death or membership disenrollment. Primary outcomes included ipsilateral knee procedures overall and by type (ie, repeat meniscal repair and meniscectomy); secondary outcomes included other surgical interventions of the same knee, any contralateral knee surgery, deep surgical-site infection, and deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 1359 patients with a median age of 24 years (interquartile range [IQR], 17-34) who underwent BHMR for a BHMT. During the follow-up period (median, 50.2 months [IQR, 32.3-60.6]), 495 subsequent ipsilateral procedures were performed in 274 (20.2%) patients, and the median time to the first procedure was 10.6 months (IQR, 4.1-23.5). An overall 59 (4.3%) patients underwent repeat meniscal repair, and 165 (12.1%) had a subsequent meniscectomy of the same knee. Significant risk factors for subsequent ipsilateral procedures included younger age, 12 to 18 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.77 [95% CI, 1.84-18.08]) and 19 to 30 years (aOR, 3.65 [95% CI, 1.17-11.36]), as well as normal and overweight body mass index (aOR, 2.84 [95% CI, 1.29-6.23] and 2.34 [95% CI, 1.06-5.17], respectively). Patients undergoing concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) at the initial BHMR had a lower risk of undergoing subsequent surgery (aOR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.49-0.87]) than those without concomitant ACLR.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest reported study on outcomes after BHMR in a contained cohort. One-fifth of patients underwent subsequent ipsilateral surgery during follow-up, with 4.3% receiving a repeat meniscal repair and 12.1% experiencing a meniscectomy. Risk factors for subsequent surgery of the same knee included younger age and normal or overweight body mass index. Concomitant ACLR at time of BHMR reduced the risk of subsequent reoperation.

摘要

背景

约占所有半月板撕裂的 10%,桶柄状半月板撕裂 (BHMT) 是一种大的纵向垂直撕裂,其附着的碎片翻转到髁间切迹中。半月板切除术常导致半月板大量丢失和关节负荷增加。相比之下,半月板修复试图恢复半月板的功能,并旨在保持关节力学。

目的

评估接受桶柄状半月板修复 (BHMR) 的患者随后同侧膝关节手术的长期风险,并评估与随后膝关节手术干预相关的危险因素。

研究设计

病例系列;证据水平,4 级。

方法

我们对 2011 年至 2018 年间接受关节镜下膝关节半月板修复的 12 至 65 岁的所有患者进行了电子病历搜索,以寻找 BHMT 患者。我们排除了之前接受过 BHMR 的患者、在 BHMR 前 60 天内没有膝关节磁共振成像的患者、在 BHMR 前和后一年中没有 Kaiser 保险的活跃会员资格的患者,或在 BHMR 前接受过半月板切除术的患者。所有患者随访至 2019 年 12 月 31 日,以死亡或会员退出为截止日期。主要结局包括同侧膝关节手术的总发生率和类型(即,重复半月板修复和半月板切除术);次要结局包括同一膝关节的其他手术干预、任何对侧膝关节手术、深部手术部位感染和深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞。

结果

最终队列包括 1359 名接受 BHMR 治疗 BHMT 的患者,中位年龄为 24 岁(四分位距 [IQR],17-34)。在随访期间(中位数,50.2 个月 [IQR,32.3-60.6]),274 名患者中有 495 例进行了同侧后续手术,首次手术的中位时间为 10.6 个月(IQR,4.1-23.5)。共有 59 名患者(4.3%)接受了重复半月板修复,165 名患者(12.1%)对同一膝关节进行了后续半月板切除术。同侧手术的显著危险因素包括年龄较小(12 至 18 岁,调整后的优势比 [aOR],5.77 [95%CI,1.84-18.08];19 至 30 岁,aOR,3.65 [95%CI,1.17-11.36])和正常或超重体重指数(aOR,2.84 [95%CI,1.29-6.23] 和 2.34 [95%CI,1.06-5.17])。在初次 BHMR 时同时进行前交叉韧带重建 (ACLR) 的患者随后接受手术的风险较低(aOR,0.66 [95%CI,0.49-0.87])比未同时进行 ACLR 的患者。

结论

这是在一个包含队列中报告的关于 BHMR 后结果的最大研究。在随访期间,五分之一的患者接受了同侧手术,其中 4.3%接受了重复半月板修复,12.1%接受了半月板切除术。同一膝关节手术的危险因素包括年龄较小和正常或超重体重指数。在 BHMR 时同时进行 ACLR 可降低随后再次手术的风险。

相似文献

1
Surgical Outcomes After Bucket-Handle Meniscal Repairs: Analysis of a Large Contained Cohort.Bucket-Handle 半月板修复术后的手术结果:大型封闭队列分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jul;50(9):2390-2396. doi: 10.1177/03635465221101136. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
2
Comparison of Subsequent Surgery After Repair in Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears and Meniscectomy Analysis of a Large, Contained Cohort Study.桶柄状半月板撕裂修复术后二次手术与半月板切除术的比较:一项大型纳入队列研究的分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Sep 5;12(9):23259671241270355. doi: 10.1177/23259671241270355. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Comparative Outcomes of Radial and Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tear Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.径向与桶柄状半月板撕裂修复的对比结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2653-2660. doi: 10.1177/0363546518786035. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
4
Single-stage repair of displaced bucket-handle meniscal tears with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to good meniscal survivorship : a retrospective cohort study.一期修复合并前交叉韧带重建的移位型瓣状半月板撕裂可获得良好的半月板存活率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Jun;104-B(6):680-686. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B6.BJJ-2021-1340.R2.
5
Long-term follow-up of bucket-handle meniscal repairs: chondroprotective effect outweighs high failure risk.桶柄状半月板修复的长期随访:软骨保护作用大于高失败风险。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jul;30(7):2209-2214. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06787-2. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
6
Trends in the surgical treatment of meniscal tears in patients with and without concurrent anterior cruciate ligament tears.半月板撕裂患者合并与不合并前交叉韧带撕裂的手术治疗趋势。
Phys Sportsmed. 2020 May;48(2):229-235. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2019.1685363. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
7
Low meniscus reoperation rates following meniscus repair during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Turkey: an in-depth national analysis of 8-years.土耳其前交叉韧带重建术中半月板修复后的低半月板再手术率:8 年的深入全国分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jul 17;25(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07662-0.
8
Influence of Medial Meniscus Bucket-Handle Repair in Setting of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Tibiofemoral Contact Mechanics: A Biomechanical Study.前交叉韧带重建中内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修复对胫股接触力学的影响:一项生物力学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Aug;35(8):2412-2420. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.052.
9
Failure Rates of Repaired Bucket-Handle Tears of the Medial Meniscus Concomitant With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cohort Study of 253 Patients From the SANTI Study Group With a Mean Follow-up of 94 Months.内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂修复术与前交叉韧带重建术同时进行的失败率:来自SANTI研究组的253例患者队列研究,平均随访94个月。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Mar;51(3):585-595. doi: 10.1177/03635465221148497. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
10
What Is the Failure Rate After Arthroscopic Repair of Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.桶柄状半月板撕裂关节镜修复术后的失败率是多少?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 May;50(6):1742-1752. doi: 10.1177/03635465211015425. Epub 2021 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Saving the Meniscus: A Retrospective Observational Study of the Incidence, Treatment, and Failure Rate of the Main Meniscal Tear Types at 24-Month Follow-Up.挽救半月板:一项关于主要半月板撕裂类型在24个月随访时的发病率、治疗及失败率的回顾性观察研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 12;14(10):3350. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103350.
2
Single-stage ACL reconstruction and displaced bucket handle Meniscus repair is associated with lower Meniscus repair failure rates compared to two-stage surgery.与两阶段手术相比,单阶段前交叉韧带重建和移位的桶柄状半月板修复的半月板修复失败率较低。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Mar 7;12(1):e70199. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70199. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Repair of bucket handle meniscus tears improves patient outcomes versus partial meniscectomy at the time of ACL reconstruction.
在进行前交叉韧带重建时,与部分半月板切除术相比,桶柄状半月板撕裂修复术能改善患者预后。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Aug 28;11(3):e70004. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70004. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Good mid- to long-term outcomes after meniscus bucket-handle tear repair: A comparative analysis with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.半月板桶柄状撕裂修复术后良好的中长期疗效:前交叉韧带重建与未重建的对比分析
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Jul 15;11(3):e12093. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.12093. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
[Study on clinical characteristics and surgical methods of bucket-handle meniscal tears].[半月板桶柄状撕裂的临床特征及手术方法研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 15;37(11):1335-1341. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202308001.
6
Previous Isolated Medial Bucket-Handle Meniscus Repair Significantly Increases Risk of Subsequent Ipsilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.既往孤立性内侧半月板桶柄样撕裂修复显著增加同侧前交叉韧带重建风险。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 May 27;5(3):e671-e678. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.03.008. eCollection 2023 Jun.