Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block with ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block for paediatric hip surgery: A randomised, double-blinded study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Postoperative pain after hip surgeries in children could be classified as severe, requiring combined intra- and postoperative opioid analgesia with regional blocks. This study was carried out to investigate ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block for pain management after paediatric hip surgery. The primary objective was to assess the time of the first request for morphine rescue analgesia.

METHODS

In this randomised study, 56 children scheduled for elective unilateral hip surgery were distributed randomly to ESP and PENG groups. Intraoperative haemodynamics, fentanyl consumption, postoperative pain measurement, morphine consumption, time of first rescue analgesia, adverse effects and parents' satisfaction score were studied. The primary outcome was the time of the first request for morphine rescue analgesia. The Chi-square test, Student's -test and the Mann-Whitney test were used, where applicable, to compare the groups.

RESULTS

The time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in Group ESP than in Group PENG ( < 0.001), with significantly higher postoperative morphine consumption in Group PENG than in Group ESP ( = 0.04). The pain scores of Group ESP were lower than those of Group PENG at 2 and 4 h postoperatively ( = 0.006 and < 0.001, respectively). At 8 h postoperatively, the score was significantly higher in Group ESP than in Group PENG ( = 0.005). Other outcomes were comparable between both groups ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ESP and PENG could be both effective for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in paediatric hip surgeries, but the ESP block prolonged the time of first rescue analgesia more than the PENG block.