Littlejohn Jenna, Blackburn Daniel J, Venneri Annalena
Department of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Front Dement. 2023 Nov 17;2:1207546. doi: 10.3389/frdem.2023.1207546. eCollection 2023.
Hearing loss and dementia are linked, although the roles of peripheral and central auditory dysfunction are not well defined. Many behavioral measures of hearing are confounded by the overlapping cognitive functions required to perform the tests.
To collect pilot data to identify how central auditory function, measured using a dichotic listening test that indexes both auditory and cognitive components under different attentional conditions, differs among people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), dementia and controls, and how performance relates to neuropsychological results.
Fifty-eight participants (17 MCI, 11 dementia and 30 controls) undertook hearing screening, the Bergen consonant-vowel dichotic listening paradigm, and a short battery of neuropsychological tests chosen to index attention and executive control. Dichotic listening was assessed under three attentional conditions (non-forced, forced right ear and forced left) amongst older adults with normal cognitive function, MCI and dementia.
We report two main findings: (a) The expected right ear advantage under non-forced conditions, was seen in controls and patients with dementia but not in people with MCI, who showed equal numbers of correct responses from both ears (i.e., a lack of asymmetry); (b) Performance under forced attentional conditions was significantly associated with disease progression (i.e., control > MCI > dementia) and performance on the cognitive tasks.
The reduction in asymmetry on dichotic listening tasks may be a marker of MCI and reflect underlying compensatory mechanisms. Use of this test could aid stratification of patients with memory disorders. Whether abnormalities could predict dementia onset needs longitudinal investigation in a larger sample.
听力损失与痴呆症有关,尽管外周和中枢听觉功能障碍的作用尚未明确界定。许多听力的行为测量方法都因执行测试所需的重叠认知功能而混淆。
收集初步数据,以确定在不同注意力条件下使用双耳分听测试测量的中枢听觉功能(该测试同时评估听觉和认知成分)在轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者、痴呆症患者和对照组之间有何不同,以及该测试表现与神经心理学结果之间的关系。
58名参与者(17名MCI患者、11名痴呆症患者和30名对照组)进行了听力筛查、卑尔根辅音 - 元音双耳分听范式测试,以及一系列用于评估注意力和执行控制的简短神经心理学测试。在正常认知功能的老年人、MCI患者和痴呆症患者的三种注意力条件下(非强制、强制右耳和强制左耳)评估双耳分听。
我们报告了两个主要发现:(a)在非强制条件下预期的右耳优势在对照组和痴呆症患者中可见,但在MCI患者中未出现,MCI患者双耳的正确反应数量相同(即缺乏不对称性);(b)在强制注意力条件下的表现与疾病进展(即对照组>MCI患者>痴呆症患者)和认知任务的表现显著相关。
双耳分听任务中不对称性的降低可能是MCI的一个标志,并反映潜在的代偿机制。使用该测试有助于对记忆障碍患者进行分层。这些异常是否可预测痴呆症发病需要在更大样本中进行纵向研究。