Walsh Liam, Hong Chuen Yen, Chalakkal Renoh, Hong Sheng Chiong, O'Keeffe Ben, Ogbuehi Kelechi
Te Whatu Ora Southern, Dunedin, New Zealand.
oDocs Eye Care Ltd., Dunedin, New Zealand.
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Dec;30(12):2795-2804. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0258. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
Background: This systematic review of teleophthalmology services in Australia, the United States of America (USA), Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK) during the COVID-19 pandemic is aimed to evaluate changes in teleophthalmology, comparing them to New Zealand (NZ).
Methods:A literature search of electronic databases Scopus, Proquest, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Google was conducted using search terms: telemedicine, ophthalmology, teleophthalmology/teleophthalmology, and COVID/COVID-19/coronavirus/covid-pandemic. Studies describing teleophthalmology services created in response to COVID-19 restrictions from March 1, 2020, to January 31, 2024, were analyzed.
Results:Of the articles, 37 describing 29 discrete teleophthalmology services were included. There were 15 services in the USA, seven in the UK, two in Canada, two in Australia, and three in NZ. The models of care in the USA were well described, and teleophthalmology was used for general, external, anterior segment, neuro-ophthalmology, and oculoplastic consults, as well as for grading of fundus images in the emergency department setting. In the UK, teleophthalmology was used for general eye care, oculoplastics, and pediatric ophthalmology. In Australia, teleophthalmology was used for postglaucoma surgery monitoring of Intraocular Pressure. In NZ, teleophthalmology was used for general eye consults and triaging, but no formal models were described.
Conclusion:COVID-19 offered a unique opportunity for re-examination and expansion of teleophthalmology services globally. Video-based and home-screening teleophthalmology services are feasible but have limitations. Investing in multidisciplinary and community-based technology partnerships can create more equitable teleophthalmology care models (to complement and, when necessary, replace traditional in-person consults), within existing frameworks, making eye care more accessible and efficient.
本项对澳大利亚、美利坚合众国(美国)、加拿大和英国在新冠疫情期间的远程眼科服务进行的系统评价旨在评估远程眼科的变化,并与新西兰(NZ)进行比较。
使用搜索词“远程医疗”“眼科”“远程眼科”和“新冠/新冠-19/冠状病毒/新冠疫情”对电子数据库Scopus、Proquest、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、谷歌学术和谷歌进行文献检索。分析了描述2020年3月1日至2024年1月31日期间因新冠疫情限制而创建的远程眼科服务的研究。
纳入了37篇描述29项不同远程眼科服务的文章。美国有15项服务,英国有7项,加拿大有2项,澳大利亚有2项,新西兰有3项。美国的护理模式描述得很详细,远程眼科用于普通、外部、眼前节、神经眼科和眼整形咨询,以及急诊科眼底图像分级。在英国,远程眼科用于普通眼科护理、眼整形和小儿眼科。在澳大利亚,远程眼科用于青光眼术后眼压监测。在新西兰,远程眼科用于普通眼科咨询和分诊,但未描述正式模式。
新冠疫情为全球重新审视和扩展远程眼科服务提供了独特机会。基于视频和家庭筛查的远程眼科服务是可行的,但有局限性。在现有框架内投资于多学科和基于社区的技术伙伴关系可以创建更公平的远程眼科护理模式(以补充并在必要时取代传统的面对面咨询),使眼科护理更容易获得且更高效。