Akihiko Kitamura, Research Team for Social Participation and Community Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology; 35-2 Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-0015, Japan; Phone: +81(3)3964-3241, Fax: +81(3)3964-4776; Email:
J Frailty Aging. 2024;13(3):233-239. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2024.51.
Associated factors for frailty development according to age group remain unclear.
To identify frailty score trajectories among community-dwelling older Japanese individuals and examine their associated factors.
13-year longitudinal study.
Kusatsu Town in Gunma Prefecture, Japan.
1706 older adults aged ≥ 65 years who completed an annual frailty assessment at least once between 2007 and 2019.
Frailty status was determined using an index based on the Fried frailty phenotype criteria. Potential associated factors for frailty trajectory included physical, biological, lifestyle-related, and psychological factors, as well as comorbidities.
We identified five trajectory patterns in the frailty score from age of 65 to 90 years -individuals who were robust (Group 1, 10.5%) as well as individuals with late-onset frailty (Group 2, 16.1%), middle-onset frailty (Group 3, 25.6% and Group 4, 35.2%), and early-onset frailty (Group 5, 12.7%). Compared with the other groups, the early-onset group showed a higher prevalence of cerebrovascular diseases, bone and joint diseases, poor nutrition, sarcopenia, hospitalization, low cognitive function, and smoking at the end of follow-up. Associated factors in the middle-onset group largely overlapped with those of the early-onset group. The late-onset frailty group tended to have a higher association with heart disease and bone and joint diseases compared with the robust group.
Our findings from a 13-year longitudinal study identified five frailty trajectory patterns and seven associated factors for frailty trajectory. Proposed effective population-based frailty prevention strategies in each age group may contribute to effective strategies to extend healthy life expectancy in aging, aged, and super-aged communities.
按年龄组划分的虚弱发展相关因素仍不清楚。
确定社区居住的日本老年人的虚弱评分轨迹,并研究其相关因素。
13 年纵向研究。
日本群马县草津町。
1706 名年龄≥65 岁的老年人,他们在 2007 年至 2019 年间至少完成了一次年度虚弱评估。
虚弱状况采用基于弗莱德虚弱表型标准的指数来确定。虚弱轨迹的潜在相关因素包括身体、生物、生活方式相关和心理因素以及合并症。
我们从 65 岁到 90 岁之间确定了虚弱评分的五种轨迹模式——强壮的个体(第 1 组,10.5%)以及晚发性虚弱的个体(第 2 组,16.1%)、中年发性虚弱的个体(第 3 组,25.6%和第 4 组,35.2%)和早发性虚弱的个体(第 5 组,12.7%)。与其他组相比,早发性组在随访结束时更常见脑血管疾病、骨骼和关节疾病、营养不良、肌肉减少症、住院、认知功能低下和吸烟。中年组的相关因素与早发性组大致相同。与强壮组相比,晚发性虚弱组更倾向于与心脏病和骨骼关节疾病相关。
我们从一项 13 年的纵向研究中发现了五种虚弱轨迹模式和七种与虚弱轨迹相关的因素。针对每个年龄组提出的有效的基于人群的虚弱预防策略可能有助于延长老龄化、老年化和超老龄化社区的健康预期寿命。