RN, MSc, PhD. Honorary Collaborating Professor, Department of Health Psychology. Universidad de Alicante. Alicante. Spain.
Invest Educ Enferm. 2024 Mar;42(1). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v42n1e02.
This article deals with the particularities of the quality of qualitative research, under the double lens of valuing it and ensuring it. While achieving the quality of qualitative research concerns only those who have opted for this methodology, assessing it is everyone's business because researchers in training will encounter, in the literature reviews, qualitative studies on which they must reflect and estimate their quality. Appreciating the quality of a research work is a complex activity as it is situated within a context and conducted by individuals who use any of the means available to do so. The means they use are criteria as evaluation guides and criteria checklists. For researchers in training, I suggest some guiding criteria to evaluate qualitative publications and ensure quality during the research process, key issues that they must address.
本文从重视和保证定性研究质量的双重角度,探讨了定性研究质量的特殊性。虽然实现定性研究的质量仅与选择这种方法的人有关,但评估其质量是每个人的责任,因为受训的研究人员在文献综述中会遇到必须对其进行反思和评估质量的定性研究。评价研究工作的质量是一项复杂的活动,因为它处于特定的背景下,由使用任何可用手段进行评价的个人进行。他们使用的手段是作为评价指南的标准和标准检查表。对于受训的研究人员,我建议使用一些指导标准来评价定性出版物,并确保研究过程中的质量,这是他们必须解决的关键问题。