MSN, RN, Nursing Tutor, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Nursing, Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be university), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.
Ph.D, RN. Centre for Evidence Based Practice in Health Care, Chitkara School of Health Sciences, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Invest Educ Enferm. 2024 Mar;42(1). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v42n1e04.
To evaluate the effectiveness of Virtual Teaching (VT) Programme regarding palliative care on knowledge, self-efficacy and attitude among Nursing Personnel working in selected hospitals of North India.
A quasi-experimental study with non-equivalent control group pre-test-post-test design was conducted on 121 Nursing Personnel, selected by convenient sampling technique. Knowledge, self-efficacy and attitude were assessed using structured knowledge questionnaire, Palliative Care Self-efficacy Scale, and Frommelt Attitudes toward care of dying scale respectively. Nursing personnel in experimental group received Virtual Teaching Programme regarding palliative care whereas those in comparison group received conventional teaching (CT). The study included a pre-test followed by the teaching (virtual/ conventional) on day one. The post-test was conducted on 15th day after the intervention.
The results showed that there was a significant difference in mean post-test knowledge (VT group: 17.11 to CT group: 25.05; t=9.25, p<0.001), self-efficacy (VT group: 39.27 to CT group: 43.38; t=6.39, p<0.001) and attitude (VT group: 108.86 to CT group: 133.23; t=9.27, p<0.001) scores between virtual teaching group and conventional teaching group. ANCOVA test revealed statistically significant differences in the mean scores of knowledge [F (1.11) = 86.61, p<0.001], self-efficacy [F (1.11) = 841.75, p<0.001] and attitude [F (1.11) = 82.92, p<0.001] between the groups, with higher means obtained in the CT group.
Virtual Teaching programme and Conventional teaching both were effective in enhancing the knowledge, self-efficacy and attitude among Nursing Personnel regarding palliative care with conventional teaching being more effective.
评估虚拟教学(VT)计划在北印度选定医院工作的护理人员对姑息治疗知识、自我效能感和态度的有效性。
采用非均衡对照组前测-后测设计的准实验研究,对 121 名护理人员进行了调查,采用方便抽样技术进行了调查。使用结构化知识问卷、姑息治疗自我效能量表和弗罗梅尔对临终关怀态度量表分别评估知识、自我效能感和态度。实验组接受虚拟教学计划姑息治疗,而对照组接受常规教学(CT)。研究包括前测,然后在第一天进行教学(虚拟/常规)。干预后第 15 天进行后测。
结果表明,虚拟教学组和常规教学组在知识(VT 组:17.11 至 CT 组:25.05;t=9.25,p<0.001)、自我效能感(VT 组:39.27 至 CT 组:43.38;t=6.39,p<0.001)和态度(VT 组:108.86 至 CT 组:133.23;t=9.27,p<0.001)得分上存在显著差异。协方差分析显示,知识[F(1.11)=86.61,p<0.001]、自我效能感[F(1.11)=841.75,p<0.001]和态度[F(1.11)=82.92,p<0.001]的得分组间差异具有统计学意义,CT 组的平均值较高。
虚拟教学计划和常规教学都能有效提高护理人员对姑息治疗的知识、自我效能感和态度,常规教学效果更好。