Baker Ryleigh E, Cheung Christian P, Coates Alexandra M, Currie Katharine D, King Trevor J, Mountjoy Margo L, Burr Jamie F
Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, CANADA.
Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024 Dec 1;56(12):2305-2314. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003523. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
The distinct physical and environmental stressors of artistic swimming (previously termed synchronized swimming) result in unique hemodynamic stimuli. Given that the hemodynamic stress associated with participation in an exercise modality drives adaptation of the heart and central vasculature, artistic swimming may produce a distinct cardiovascular phenotype. Presumably, athletes competing at the highest levels also have greater training exposure and thus exhibit more adaptation. The purpose of this study was to characterize cardiovascular form and function across the competitive spectrum of artistic swimmers.
Cardiovascular structure and function were compared in a cross-sectional study of healthy controls, varsity, and elite artistic swimmers, using pulse wave analysis, pulse wave velocity, and echocardiographic images both at rest and during isometric handgrip exercise.
Aortic stiffness was similar across all groups, as were characteristics of the decomposed aortic pressure waveform. At rest, both varsity and elite swimmers demonstrated similar systolic function compared with controls. However, peak left ventricular twist was greater in varsity and elites (controls: 8.0 ± 3.9, varsity: 12.8 ± 8.6, elites: 13.4 ± 3.9; both P < 0.02). Furthermore, elites demonstrated greater peak left ventricular radial strain (controls: 29.2 ± 9.9, varsity: 32.5 ± 10.3, elites: 53.9 ± 15.1; both P < 0.001) and longitudinal strain (controls: -16.9 ± 1.6, varsity: -16.5 ± 1.8, elites: -19.5 ± 3.2; both P < 0.04). In contrast to controls, both varsity and elite artistic swimmers demonstrated no change in peak late diastolic transmitral filling velocity (controls: Δ0.2 ± 0.04 m·s -1 , varsity: Δ0.06 ± 0.04 m·s -1 , elites: Δ0.05 ± 0.04 m·s -1 ) during isometric handgrip exercise (both P > 0.05), with elites demonstrating lower peak velocity than varsity swimmers ( P = 0.048), indicating preservation of diastolic function.
Artistic swimmers demonstrate distinct cardiac physiology at rest and during isometric handgrip, with a greater extent of distinguishing features observed in those competing at the highest level of competition.
花样游泳(以前称为同步游泳)独特的身体和环境应激源会产生独特的血流动力学刺激。鉴于参与一种运动方式所带来的血流动力学应激会促使心脏和中心血管系统发生适应性变化,花样游泳可能会产生独特的心血管表型。据推测,参加最高水平比赛的运动员也有更多的训练经历,因此表现出更多的适应性变化。本研究的目的是描述花样游泳运动员在整个竞技水平范围内的心血管形态和功能特征。
在一项横断面研究中,对健康对照组、大学代表队和精英花样游泳运动员的心血管结构和功能进行比较,采用脉搏波分析、脉搏波速度以及静息和等长握力运动期间的超声心动图图像。
所有组的主动脉僵硬度相似,分解后的主动脉压力波形特征也相似。静息时,大学代表队和精英组游泳运动员的收缩功能与对照组相似。然而,大学代表队和精英组的左心室峰值扭转更大(对照组:8.0±3.9,大学代表队:12.8±8.6,精英组:13.4±3.9;P均<0.02)。此外,精英组的左心室峰值径向应变更大(对照组:29.2±9.9,大学代表队:32.5±10.3,精英组:53.9±15.1;P均<0.001)和纵向应变更大(对照组:-16.9±1.6,大学代表队:-16.5±1.8,精英组:-19.5±3.2;P均<0.04)。与对照组不同,大学代表队和精英花样游泳运动员在等长握力运动期间舒张期末期二尖瓣峰值充盈速度均无变化(对照组:Δ0.2±0.04m·s-1,大学代表队:Δ0.06±0.04m·s-1,精英组:Δ0.05±0.04m·s-1;P均>0.05),精英组的峰值速度低于大学代表队游泳运动员(P = 0.048),表明舒张功能得以保留。
花样游泳运动员在静息和等长握力运动期间表现出独特的心脏生理特征,在最高水平比赛的运动员中观察到的区别特征更为明显。