Center for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Department of Neuroscience, Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49 (ON5b), 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Center for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Department of Neuroscience, Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49 (ON5b), 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Research Unit of Clinical Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Nov;113:102467. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102467. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
Self-injurious thoughts and behaviours (SITBs) are a leading cause of death, and interpersonal processes (IPs) appear to play a role in SITBs. This systematic review synthesises the literature on IPs and SITBs in daily life and addresses four critical questions: (1) Which IPs have been assessed and how, (2) How are differences in IPs between individuals associated with SITBs?, (3) How are differences in IPs within individuals associated with SITBs? and (4) Do IPs relate differently to self-injurious thoughts than behaviours? Our review followed PRISMA guidelines and eligible literature was screened until 25 April 2024. We identified 58 Experience Sampling studies (32.76% daily-diary studies) of which most focused on IPs from major SITBs theories (e.g., thwarted belongingness) but largely used inconsistent operationalizations. Results from 39 studies investigating within-person associations were mixed. Based on 26 studies, whether differences in IPs between individuals relate to SITBs remains unclear. Three studies have investigated whether IPs relate to the transition from thoughts to behaviours, but temporal models are needed to draw firm conclusions. Studies investigating IPs and SITBs in daily life are largely inconclusive. Psychometrically validated measures are warranted, and future daily-life studies would benefit from drawing on ideation-to-action frameworks.
自我伤害思想和行为(SITBs)是导致死亡的主要原因之一,人际过程(IPs)似乎在 SITBs 中发挥作用。本系统综述综合了日常生活中 IPs 和 SITBs 的文献,并回答了四个关键问题:(1)评估了哪些 IPs 以及如何评估,(2)个体之间的 IPs 差异如何与 SITBs 相关,(3)个体内部的 IPs 差异如何与 SITBs 相关,以及(4)IPs 与自我伤害思想的关系是否与行为不同?我们的综述遵循 PRISMA 指南,筛选合格的文献直到 2024 年 4 月 25 日。我们确定了 58 项经验抽样研究(32.76%为日常日记研究),其中大多数研究集中于主要 SITBs 理论的 IPs(例如,受挫归属感),但主要使用不一致的操作化。39 项研究中调查个体内关联的结果喜忧参半。基于 26 项研究,个体之间的 IPs 差异是否与 SITBs 相关仍不清楚。三项研究调查了 IPs 是否与从思想到行为的转变有关,但需要时间模型才能得出明确的结论。研究 IPs 和 SITBs 在日常生活中基本没有定论。需要验证心理测量学的衡量标准,未来的日常生活研究将受益于从思维到行动的框架。