Public Health Administration, Makkah Health Affairs, Ministry of Health, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Alhajj Primary Health Care, Makkah Health Cluster, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Jul 30;111(4):914-923. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0667. Print 2024 Oct 2.
The Hajj is an annual mass gathering of people in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Respiratory infections are common due to their potential for rapid spread in crowded settings. There is a lack of data regarding the effectiveness of face masks in preventing respiratory tract infections (RTIs), specifically during Hajj. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until July 3, 2023 for studies comparing the incidence or prevalence of RTIs in those who used any face mask during Hajj compared with no mask. Risk ratio (RRs) and 95% CIs were calculated using either a fixed or random-effect model, depending on the heterogeneity. A comprehensive analysis encompassed 10 studies involving 5007 participants. The overall RR favored wearing masks over not wearing masks regarding the incidence of RTIs; however, the difference was not statistically significant (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.55-1.10; P = 0.16). A significantly lower incidence of RTIs was found in those wearing masks most of the time versus intermittently (RR = 0.59; 95% CI = [0.38-0.94; P = 0.02). In subgroup analyses, there was no difference between wearing masks and not wearing masks across different study designs (cohort/case-control), different groups (pilgrims/healthcare workers), and different years of Hajj, except from 2000 to 2008, when there was a significant difference favoring wearing face masks. This meta-analysis found wearing masks most of the time was associated with significantly lower risk of RTIs than wearing it intermittently.
麦加朝圣是每年在沙特阿拉伯麦加举行的一次大规模集会。由于其在拥挤环境中迅速传播的潜力,呼吸道感染很常见。关于口罩在预防呼吸道感染(RTIs)方面的有效性,特别是在朝圣期间,数据有限。我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册中心,直到 2023 年 7 月 3 日,以比较在朝圣期间使用任何口罩与不使用口罩的人之间 RTIs 的发病率或患病率的研究。使用固定或随机效应模型计算风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间,具体取决于异质性。综合分析包括 10 项涉及 5007 名参与者的研究。总体 RR 有利于戴口罩而不是不戴口罩,以减少 RTIs 的发病率;然而,差异没有统计学意义(RR = 0.78;95%CI = 0.55-1.10;P = 0.16)。与间歇性佩戴口罩相比,大部分时间佩戴口罩的 RTIs 发病率明显较低(RR = 0.59;95%CI = [0.38-0.94;P = 0.02)。在亚组分析中,在不同的研究设计(队列/病例对照)、不同的人群(朝圣者/卫生保健工作者)和不同的朝圣年份(2000 年至 2008 年除外)中,戴口罩和不戴口罩之间没有差异,但在 2000 年至 2008 年期间,戴口罩的优势显著。这项荟萃分析发现,大部分时间佩戴口罩与间歇性佩戴口罩相比,RTIs 的风险明显降低。