• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新构想复杂创伤后应激障碍:一种用于机制和干预的预测加工框架。

Reconceptualizing complex posttraumatic stress disorder: A predictive processing framework for mechanisms and intervention.

机构信息

School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Sep;164:105836. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105836. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105836
PMID:39084584
Abstract

In this article, we introduce a framework for interpreting Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (C-PTSD) through predictive processing, a neuroscience concept explaining the brain's interpretation and prediction of sensory information. While closely related to PTSD, C-PTSD encompasses additional symptom clusters marked by disturbances in self-organization (DSO), such as negative self-concept, affect dysregulation, and relational difficulties, typically resulting from prolonged traumatic stressors. Our model leverages advances in computational psychiatry and neuroscience, offering a mechanistic explanation for these symptoms by illustrating how prolonged trauma disrupts the brain's predictive processing. Specifically, altered predictive mechanisms contribute to C-PTSD's symptomatology, focusing on DSO: (1) Negative self-concept emerges from maladaptive priors that bias perception towards self-criticism, misaligning expected and actual interoceptive states; (2) Misalignment between predicted and actual interoceptive signals leads to affect dysregulation, with sensitivity to bodily cues; and (3) Relationship challenges arise from skewed social prediction errors, fostering mistrust and withdrawal. This precision-focused approach sheds light on the dynamics underpinning C-PTSD and highlights potential intervention targets aimed at recalibrating the predictive processing system.

摘要

在本文中,我们通过预测处理来介绍一种解释复杂创伤后应激障碍(C-PTSD)的框架,这是一个解释大脑如何解释和预测感觉信息的神经科学概念。虽然与 PTSD 密切相关,但 C-PTSD 包含了其他以自我组织障碍(DSO)为特征的症状群,例如消极的自我概念、情绪失调和人际关系困难,这些通常是由长期的创伤性压力源引起的。我们的模型利用计算精神病学和神经科学的进展,通过说明长期创伤如何破坏大脑的预测处理,为这些症状提供了一种机械解释。具体来说,改变的预测机制导致了 C-PTSD 的症状,重点是 DSO:(1)消极的自我概念源于适应性先验,使感知偏向自我批判,使预期和实际的内脏状态不一致;(2)预测和实际内脏信号之间的不匹配导致情绪失调,对身体线索敏感;(3)扭曲的社会预测误差导致人际关系挑战,助长不信任和退缩。这种注重精度的方法揭示了 C-PTSD 背后的动态,并突出了潜在的干预目标,旨在重新校准预测处理系统。

相似文献

1
Reconceptualizing complex posttraumatic stress disorder: A predictive processing framework for mechanisms and intervention.重新构想复杂创伤后应激障碍:一种用于机制和干预的预测加工框架。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Sep;164:105836. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105836. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Heartbeat evoked potentials in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder: an unaltered neurobiological regulation system?创伤后应激障碍患者的心跳相关诱发电位:未改变的神经生物学调节系统?
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Nov 17;12(1):1987686. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1987686. eCollection 2021.
3
Evaluating the predictions of an interoceptive inference model of bulimia nervosa.评估神经性贪食症的内感受推理模型的预测结果。
J Eat Disord. 2024 May 13;12(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01010-2.
4
Rethinking post-traumatic stress disorder - A predictive processing perspective.重新思考创伤后应激障碍——一种预测性加工视角
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jun;113:448-460. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.04.014. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
5
[Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a consequence of the interaction between an individual genetic susceptibility, a traumatogenic event and a social context].[创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)作为个体遗传易感性、创伤性事件和社会环境之间相互作用的结果]
Encephale. 2012 Oct;38(5):373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
6
Impulsivity facets' predictive relations with DSM-5 PTSD symptom clusters.冲动性各方面与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍症状群的预测关系。
Psychol Trauma. 2017 Jan;9(1):76-79. doi: 10.1037/tra0000146. Epub 2016 May 30.
7
Differentiating symptom profiles of ICD-11 PTSD, complex PTSD, and borderline personality disorder: A latent class analysis in a multiply traumatized sample.鉴别 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍、复杂创伤后应激障碍和边缘型人格障碍的症状特征:在一个多次创伤样本中的潜在类别分析。
Personal Disord. 2020 Jan;11(1):36-45. doi: 10.1037/per0000346. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
8
A psychometric assessment of Disturbances in Self-Organization symptom indicators for ICD-11 Complex PTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷对国际疾病分类第11版复杂性创伤后应激障碍自组织症状指标中的障碍进行心理测量评估。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Jan 17;9(1):1419749. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1419749. eCollection 2018.
9
The interpersonal implications of PTSD and complex PTSD: The role of disturbances in self-organization.创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍的人际影响:自我组织障碍的作用。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jul 1;290:149-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.075. Epub 2021 May 1.
10
Is Self-Compassion a Worthwhile Therapeutic Target for ICD-11 Complex PTSD (CPTSD)?自我同情是否是国际疾病分类第11版复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的一个有价值的治疗靶点?
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 May;47(3):257-269. doi: 10.1017/S1352465818000577. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Tracking conditioned fear in pair-housed mice using deep learning and real-time cue delivery.使用深度学习和实时线索传递追踪成对饲养小鼠的条件性恐惧。
Neurobiol Stress. 2025 Jun 19;37:100742. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2025.100742. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
"Calming the nightmares": A qualitative study of a socially assistive robot for sensory and emotional support in individuals with eating disorders and PTSD.“安抚噩梦”:一项关于社交辅助机器人对饮食失调和创伤后应激障碍患者提供感官和情感支持的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0325469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325469. eCollection 2025.
3
Tracking Conditioned Fear in Pair-Housed Mice Using Deep Learning and Real-Time Cue Delivery.
利用深度学习和实时线索传递追踪成对饲养小鼠的条件性恐惧。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 15:2025.05.10.653260. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.10.653260.
4
Emotional regulation mechanisms regarding posttraumatic and depressive symptoms in maltreated youth.受虐待青少年创伤后症状和抑郁症状的情绪调节机制。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 27;13:1527120. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1527120. eCollection 2025.