Shevlin Mark, Hyland Philip, Roberts Neil P, Bisson Jonathan I, Brewin Chris R, Cloitre Marylene
School of Psychology, Ulster University, Derry, Northern Ireland.
School of Business, National College of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Jan 17;9(1):1419749. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1419749. eCollection 2018.
: Two 'sibling disorders' have been proposed for the 11 version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11): Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD). To date, no research has attempted to identify the optimal symptom indicators for the 'Disturbances in Self-Organization' (DSO) symptom cluster. : The aim of the current study was to assess the psychometric performance of scores of 16 potential DSO symptom indicators from the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ). Criteria relating to score variability and their ability to discriminate were employed. : Participants ( = 1839) were a nationally representative household sample of non-institutionalized adults currently residing in the US. Item scores from the ITQ were examined in relation to basic criteria associated with interpretability, variability, homogeneity, and association with functional impairment. The performance of the DSO symptoms was also assessed using 1- and 2-parameter item response theory (IRT) models. : The distribution of responses for all DSO indicators met the criteria associated with interpretability, variability, homogeneity, and association with functional impairment. The 1-parameter graded response model was considered the best model and indicated that each set of indictors performed very similarly. : The ITQ contains 16 DSO symptom indicators and they perform well in measuring their respective symptom cluster. There was no evidence that particular indicators were 'better' than others, and it was concluded that the indicators are essentially interchangeable.
国际疾病分类(ICD - 11)第11版提出了两种“姊妹障碍”:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)。迄今为止,尚无研究试图确定“自我组织障碍”(DSO)症状群的最佳症状指标。本研究的目的是评估国际创伤问卷(ITQ)中16个潜在DSO症状指标得分的心理测量性能。采用了与得分变异性及其区分能力相关的标准。参与者(n = 1839)是目前居住在美国的非机构化成年人的全国代表性家庭样本。对ITQ的项目得分进行了检查,以了解与可解释性、变异性、同质性以及与功能损害的关联相关的基本标准。还使用单参数和双参数项目反应理论(IRT)模型评估了DSO症状的表现。所有DSO指标的反应分布均符合与可解释性、变异性、同质性以及与功能损害的关联相关的标准。单参数等级反应模型被认为是最佳模型,表明每组指标的表现非常相似。ITQ包含16个DSO症状指标,它们在测量各自的症状群方面表现良好。没有证据表明特定指标比其他指标“更好”,得出的结论是这些指标基本可以互换。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020-11-9
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2025-1
Psychiatry Res Case Rep. 2024-6
EClinicalMedicine. 2024-1-5
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017-9-6
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017-7-11
J Anxiety Disord. 2017-2-20
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990-4-1
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015-10-7
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013-11