Psychosocial Safety Climate Global Observatory, Centre for Workplace Excellence, Justice & Society, University of South Australia, Australia.
Division Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Germany.
Ind Health. 2024 Nov 26;62(6):353-366. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2024-0092. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
Worker psychological health is a significant global imperative that requires national policy action and stakeholder engagement. While national policy is a critical lever for improving worker psychological health, some countries are more progressive than others in relation to policy development and/or implementation. At the Joint Congress of the International Commission on Occupational Health, Scientific Committee on Work Organization and Psychosocial Factors and the Asia Pacific Academy for Psychosocial Factors at Work in Tokyo (September 2023), a Global Roundtable was held that to initiate international dialogue and knowledge exchange about national policy approaches for work-related psychological health. The Global Roundtable involved experts from diverse regions alongside an engaged audience of congress attendees and facilitators. Qualitative data were analysed against the five components of the National Policy Index tool comprising, policy priority, specific laws, nation-wide initiatives, sector-oriented initiatives, national survey and/or studies. Analysis revealed that while work-related psychological health is a policy priority across many countries, at the same time, there are global gaps in both legislation specificity and active regulation across different countries. For future policy development across countries, it will be beneficial to continue and deepen international discourse and for countries to share their approaches with others.
工人心理健康是一项重大的全球要务,需要国家政策行动和利益相关者的参与。虽然国家政策是改善工人心理健康的关键杠杆,但在政策制定和/或实施方面,有些国家比其他国家更为先进。在东京举行的国际职业卫生委员会、工作组织和心理社会因素科学委员会以及亚太工作场所心理社会因素学院联合大会(2023 年 9 月)上,举行了一次全球圆桌会议,旨在就与工作相关的心理健康的国家政策方法发起国际对话和知识交流。全球圆桌会议邀请了来自不同地区的专家,以及与会的大会参与者和主持人。根据国家政策指数工具的五个组成部分,对定性数据进行了分析,这些组成部分包括政策重点、具体法律、全国性倡议、面向部门的倡议、国家调查和/或研究。分析表明,尽管许多国家都将与工作相关的心理健康作为政策重点,但同时,在不同国家的立法具体性和积极监管方面存在全球性差距。对于未来的国家政策发展,继续深化国际对话并让各国相互分享其方法将是有益的。