Rettie Laura, Marsh John E, Liversedge Simon P, Wang Mengsi, Degno Federica
School of Psychology and Humanities, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Engineering Psychology, Humans and Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jun;78(6):1017-1040. doi: 10.1177/17470218241269327. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
Previous research suggests that unexpected (deviant) sounds negatively affect reading performance by inhibiting saccadic planning, which models of reading agree takes place simultaneous to parafoveal processing. This study examined the effect of deviant sounds on foveal and parafoveal processing. Participants read single sentences in quiet, standard (repeated sounds), or deviant sound conditions (a new sound within a repeated sound sequence). Sounds were presented with a variable delay coincident with the onset of fixations on target words during a period when saccadic programming and parafoveal processing occurred. We used the moving window paradigm to manipulate the amount of information readers could extract from the parafovea (the entire sentence or a 13-character window of text). Global, sentence-level analyses showed typical disruption to reading by the window, and under quiet conditions similar effects were observed at the target and post-target word in the local analyses. Standard and deviant sounds also produced clear distraction effects of differing magnitudes at the target and post-target words, though at both regions, these effects were qualified by interactions. Effects at the target word suggested that with sounds, readers engaged in less effective parafoveal processing than under quiet. Similar patterns of effects due to standard and deviant sounds, each with a different time course, occurred at the post-target word. We conclude that distraction via auditory deviation causes disruption to parafoveal processing during reading, with such effects being modulated by the degree to which a sound's characteristics are more or less unique.
先前的研究表明,意外(异常)声音会通过抑制扫视计划对阅读表现产生负面影响,而各种阅读模型均认为这种抑制发生在副中央凹加工的同时。本研究考察了异常声音对中央凹和副中央凹加工的影响。参与者在安静、标准(重复声音)或异常声音条件下(在重复声音序列中出现新声音)阅读单句。在扫视编程和副中央凹加工期间,声音会在与对目标词的注视开始同时出现可变延迟的情况下呈现。我们使用移动窗口范式来操纵读者能够从副中央凹提取的信息量(整个句子或13个字符的文本窗口)。整体的、句子层面的分析表明窗口对阅读有典型的干扰,并且在安静条件下,局部分析中在目标词和目标词之后的词上也观察到了类似的影响。标准声音和异常声音在目标词和目标词之后的词上也产生了不同程度的明显干扰效应,不过在这两个区域,这些效应都受到了交互作用的影响。目标词上的效应表明,有声音时,读者进行的副中央凹加工比安静时效率更低。标准声音和异常声音在目标词之后的词上产生了类似的效应模式,但各自的时间进程不同。我们得出结论,听觉偏差造成的干扰会在阅读过程中扰乱副中央凹加工,这种效应会受到声音特征独特程度的调节。