Division of Hospital Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
UCSF National Clinician Scholars Program, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(15):2987-2994. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08961-x. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
Minority racial and ethnic populations have the highest prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus but lower use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1ra), novel medications that reduce morbidity and mortality. Observed disparities may be due to differences in insurance coverage, which have variable cost-sharing, prior authorization, and formulary restrictions that influence medication access.
To assess whether racial/ethnic differences in SGLT2i and GLP1ra use differ by payer.
Cross-sectional analysis of 2018 and 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data.
Adults ≥ 18 years old with diabetes.
We defined insurance as private, Medicare, or Medicaid using ≥ 7 months of coverage in the calendar year. We defined race/ethnicity as White (non-Hispanic) vs non-White (including Hispanic). The primary outcome was use of ≥ 1 SGLT2i or GLP1ra medication. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the interaction between payer and race/ethnicity adjusted for cardiovascular, socioeconomic, and healthcare access factors.
We included 4997 adults, representing 24.8 million US adults annually with diabetes (mean age 63.6 years, 48.8% female, 38.8% non-White; 33.5% private insurance, 56.8% Medicare, 9.8% Medicaid). In our fully adjusted model, White individuals with private insurance had significantly more medication use versus non-White individuals (16.1% vs 8.3%, p < 0.001), which was similar for Medicare beneficiaries but more attenuated (14.7% vs 11.0%, p = 0.04). Medication rates were similar among Medicaid beneficiaries (10.0% vs 9.0%, p = 0.74).
Racial/ethnic disparities in novel diabetes medications were the largest among those with private insurance. There was no disparity among Medicaid enrollees, but overall prescription rates were the lowest. Given that disparities vary considerably by payer, differences in insurance coverage may account for the observed disparities in SGLT2i and GLP1ra use. Future studies are needed to assess racial/ethnic differences in novel diabetes use by insurance formulary restrictions and out-of-pocket cost-sharing.
少数族裔的 2 型糖尿病患病率最高,但使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂 (SGLT2i) 和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂 (GLP1ra) 的比例较低,而这些新型药物可降低发病率和死亡率。观察到的差异可能是由于保险覆盖范围的不同,包括不同的自付额、事先授权和配方限制,这些因素影响了药物的可及性。
评估 SGLT2i 和 GLP1ra 使用的种族/民族差异是否因支付者而异。
对 2018 年和 2019 年医疗支出调查数据进行横断面分析。
年龄≥18 岁且患有糖尿病的成年人。
我们将保险定义为私人保险、医疗保险或医疗补助,使用日历年内≥7 个月的覆盖范围。我们将种族/民族定义为白种人(非西班牙裔)与非白种人(包括西班牙裔)。主要结局是使用≥1 种 SGLT2i 或 GLP1ra 药物。我们使用多变量逻辑回归评估了在调整心血管、社会经济和医疗保健获取因素后,支付者和种族/民族之间的交互作用。
我们纳入了 4997 名成年人,代表每年有 2480 万患有糖尿病的美国成年人(平均年龄 63.6 岁,48.8%为女性,38.8%为非白种人;33.5%为私人保险,56.8%为医疗保险,9.8%为医疗补助)。在我们完全调整后的模型中,私人保险的白种人使用药物的比例明显高于非白种人(16.1%比 8.3%,p<0.001),医疗保险受益人的情况类似,但程度较轻(14.7%比 11.0%,p=0.04)。医疗补助受益人的用药率相似(10.0%比 9.0%,p=0.74)。
在新型糖尿病药物方面,种族/民族差异在私人保险者中最大。医疗补助参保者中没有差异,但总体处方率最低。鉴于支付者之间的差异相当大,保险覆盖范围的差异可能导致 SGLT2i 和 GLP1ra 使用的观察到的差异。需要进一步研究评估新型糖尿病药物使用的种族/民族差异,包括保险处方限制和自付额。