Clinical Bioanalytics, Pfizer Inc, Andover, USA.
Nonclinical Statistics, Pfizer Inc, Andover, USA.
AAPS J. 2024 Jul 31;26(5):88. doi: 10.1208/s12248-024-00959-x.
Duplicate analysis has been a conventional practice in the industry for ligand-binding assays (LBA), particularly for plate-based platforms like Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) assays. Recent whitepapers and guidance have opened a door to exploring the implementation of single-well (singlicate) analysis approach for LBAs. Although the bioanalytical industry has actively investigated the suitability of singlicate analysis, applications in supporting regulated LBA bioanalysis are limited. The primary reason for this limitation is the absence of appropriate strategy to facilitate the transition from duplicate to singlicate analysis. In this paper we present the first case study with our data-driven approach to implement singlicate analysis in a clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) plate based LBA assay with ISR data. The central aspect of this strategy is a head-to-head comparison with Precision and Accuracy assessment in both duplicate and singlicate formats as the initial stage of assay validation. Subsequently, statistical analysis is conducted to evaluate method variability in both precision and accuracy. The results of our study indicated that there was no impactful difference between duplicate vs singlicate, affirming the suitability of singlicate analysis for the remaining steps of PK assay validation. The validation results obtained through singlicate analysis demonstrated acceptable assay performance characteristics across all validation parameters, aligning with regulatory guidance. The validated PK assay in singlicate has been employed to support a Phase I study. The appropriateness of singlicate analyses is further supported by initial Incurred Sample Reanalysis (ISR) data in which 90.1% of ISR samples fall within the acceptable criteria.
重复分析一直是配体结合分析(LBA)行业的常规做法,特别是对于基于平板的平台,如酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和 Meso Scale Discovery(MSD)测定。最近的白皮书和指南为探索实施用于 LBA 的单孔(singlicate)分析方法开辟了道路。尽管生物分析行业已经积极研究了 singlicate 分析的适用性,但在支持监管 LBA 生物分析中的应用有限。造成这种限制的主要原因是缺乏适当的策略来促进从重复分析到 singlicate 分析的转变。在本文中,我们首次展示了使用我们的数据驱动方法在基于临床药代动力学(PK)平板的 LBA 测定中实施 singlicate 分析的案例研究,该测定具有内标回收率(ISR)数据。该策略的核心是在重复和 singlicate 格式中进行精度和准确度的对比评估,作为测定验证的初始阶段。随后,进行统计分析以评估精密度和准确度的方法变异性。我们的研究结果表明,重复与 singlicate 之间没有明显的差异,这证实了 singlicate 分析适用于 PK 测定验证的其余步骤。通过 singlicate 分析获得的验证结果表明,所有验证参数的测定性能特征均符合要求,符合监管指南。在 singlicate 中验证的 PK 测定已用于支持 I 期研究。初始受检样品再分析(ISR)数据进一步支持了 singlicate 分析的适当性,其中 90.1%的 ISR 样品符合可接受标准。