• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者主动脉瓣置换术后的短期结局——一项比较队列研究的结果

Short-term outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients - results of a comparative cohort study.

作者信息

Wu Diana A, Lang Peter, Varghese David, Al-Attar Nawwar, Shaikhrezai Kasra, Zamvar Vipin, Nair Sukumaran

机构信息

Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Agamemnon Street, Glasgow, G81 4DY, UK.

Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 31;19(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02970-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13019-024-02970-x
PMID:39085905
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11290239/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, the role of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in elderly patients has been called into question. We investigated the short-term outcomes of SAVR in the elderly population.

METHODS

All patients aged ≥ 70 years who underwent isolated SAVR in our centre between 2008 and 2017 were included in the study. Survival at 30 days and 1 year were compared for patients aged 70-79 years (n = 809) versus patients aged ≥ 80 years (n = 322). Factors associated with poorer survival outcomes were identified using multivariable Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Patients aged 70-79 years and patients aged ≥ 80 years had similar survival rates at 30 days (98.1% vs. 98.4%, p = 0.732) and 1 year (96.0% vs. 94.1%, p = 0.162) post-SAVR. This remained true after multivariable adjustment. Risk factors for 30 day all-cause mortality included insulin dependent diabetes (HR 6.17, 95% CI 1.32-28.92, p = 0.021) and increasing cardiopulmonary bypass time (HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.89-3.91, p < 0.0001). Significant risk factors for 1 year all-cause mortality were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV (HR 6.25, 95% CI 1.55-25.24, p = 0.010) and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.40-2.69, p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained for cardiac-specific mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term outcomes of SAVR are excellent in elderly patients and age alone is not a predictor of poorer outcomes. However, the increased risk of mortality in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes and those with severe functional impairment (NYHA class IV) should be carefully considered when selecting patients for SAVR in this elderly population.

摘要

背景

随着经导管主动脉瓣植入术的引入,外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)在老年患者中的作用受到质疑。我们调查了老年人群中SAVR的短期结果。

方法

纳入2008年至2017年在我们中心接受单纯SAVR的所有年龄≥70岁的患者。比较70 - 79岁患者(n = 809)与≥80岁患者(n = 322)的30天和1年生存率。使用多变量Cox回归分析确定与较差生存结果相关的因素。

结果

70 - 79岁患者和≥80岁患者在SAVR术后30天(98.1%对98.4%,p = 0.732)和1年(96.0%对94.1%,p = 0.162)的生存率相似。多变量调整后依然如此。30天全因死亡率的危险因素包括胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(HR 6.17,95% CI 1.32 - 28.92,p = 0.021)和体外循环时间延长(HR 2.72,95% CI 1.89 - 3.91,p < 0.0001)。1年全因死亡率的显著危险因素是纽约心脏协会(NYHA)IV级(HR 6.25,95% CI 1.55 - 25.24,p = 0.010)和体外循环时间延长(HR 1.94,95% CI 1.40 - 2.69,p < 0.0001)。心脏特异性死亡率也得到了类似结果。

结论

SAVR在老年患者中的短期结果良好,仅年龄并非较差结果的预测因素。然而,在为该老年人群选择SAVR患者时,应仔细考虑胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者和严重功能障碍(NYHA IV级)患者死亡率增加的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08b/11290239/cd4f9b0d05e1/13019_2024_2970_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08b/11290239/4c2c9b6a8cd4/13019_2024_2970_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08b/11290239/b511e4371eea/13019_2024_2970_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08b/11290239/6a54c6dbbcf8/13019_2024_2970_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08b/11290239/12f7a020e647/13019_2024_2970_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08b/11290239/38a2ae6a9eea/13019_2024_2970_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08b/11290239/cd4f9b0d05e1/13019_2024_2970_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08b/11290239/4c2c9b6a8cd4/13019_2024_2970_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08b/11290239/b511e4371eea/13019_2024_2970_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08b/11290239/6a54c6dbbcf8/13019_2024_2970_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08b/11290239/12f7a020e647/13019_2024_2970_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08b/11290239/38a2ae6a9eea/13019_2024_2970_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08b/11290239/cd4f9b0d05e1/13019_2024_2970_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Short-term outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients - results of a comparative cohort study.老年患者主动脉瓣置换术后的短期结局——一项比较队列研究的结果
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 31;19(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02970-x.
2
[Outcome comparison of different therapy procedures in surgical high-risk elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis].[外科高危老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者不同治疗方法的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):13-18. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.004.
3
A 3-center comparison of 1-year mortality outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement on the basis of propensity score matching among intermediate-risk surgical patients.基于中危手术患者的倾向评分匹配,对经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的 1 年死亡率结果进行的 3 中心比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 May;6(5):443-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.01.136.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in chronic kidney disease: Meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗慢性肾脏病:重建时间事件数据的荟萃分析。
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul;34(5):317-324. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
Increasing Wait-Time Mortality for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Population-Level Study of the Transition in Practice From Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者等待时间导致的死亡率增加:一项关于从外科主动脉瓣置换术到经导管主动脉瓣置换术实践转变的人群水平研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;13(11):e009297. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009297. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
6
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients over 85 years old.85岁以上患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;25(4):526-532. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx180.
7
Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.退伍军人事务医疗系统中接受经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗的中度风险患者的结局:单中心20年经验
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):390-398. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27478. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
8
1-Year Outcomes After Transfemoral Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the Italian OBSERVANT Study.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术 1 年的结果:意大利 OBSERVANT 研究的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Aug 18;66(7):804-812. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.013.
9
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: an updated meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Oct 7;40(38):3143-3153. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz275.
10
Long-term survival after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: A meta-analysis of observational comparative studies with a propensity-score analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄后的长期生存率:一项倾向评分分析的观察性比较研究的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):419-430. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27521. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Long-Term Outcomes of the Mosaic Aortic Porcine Bioprosthesis in Japan - Results From the Japan Mosaic Valve Long-Term Multicenter Study.日本镶嵌式主动脉猪生物瓣的长期结果——来自日本镶嵌式瓣膜长期多中心研究的结果。
Circ J. 2020 Jul 22;84(8):1261-1270. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1113. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients for the Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis.
低风险患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 6;9(2):439. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020439.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.对于手术风险较低的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者,经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 20;12(12):CD013319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013319.pub2.
5
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
6
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
7
Impact of Short-Term Complications on Mortality and Quality of Life After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后短期并发症对死亡率和生活质量的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):362-369. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.008.
8
Five-Year Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes From the NOTION Randomized Clinical Trial in Patients at Lower Surgical Risk.NOTION 低手术风险患者随机临床试验的五年临床和超声心动图结果
Circulation. 2019 Jun 11;139(24):2714-2723. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036606. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
9
Ageism Amplifies Cost and Prevalence of Health Conditions.年龄歧视加剧健康状况的成本和流行。
Gerontologist. 2020 Jan 24;60(1):174-181. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny131.
10
Use of the reported Edmonton frail scale in the assessment of patients for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a possible selection tool in very high-risk patients?在经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者评估中使用报告的埃德蒙顿衰弱量表:它会是极高风险患者的一种可能的筛选工具吗?
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018 Jun;15(6):463-466. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.06.010.