Juan Zhang, Cuixia Guo, Yuanjie Cui, Yan Liu, Ling Yao, Tiejuan Zhang, Li Wang, Jijing Han, Guohui Zhang, Yousheng Yan, Qingqing Wu, Lijuan Sun
Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No. 251 Yaojiayuan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100026, China.
Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No. 251 Yaojiayuan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100026, China.
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 31;29(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01993-3.
Posterior fossa malformation (PFM) is a relatively uncommon prenatal brain malformation. Genetic diagnostic approaches, including chromosome karyotyping, copy number variant (CNV) testing, and whole-exome sequencing (WES), have been applied in several cases of fetal structural malformations. However, the clinical value of appropriate genetic diagnostic approaches for different types of PFMs has not been confirmed. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to analyze the value of different combined genetic diagnostic approaches for various types of fetal PFMs.
This retrospective study was conducted at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital. Fifty-one pregnant women diagnosed with fetal PFMs who underwent genetic testing in our hospital from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2022 were enrolled; women with an isolated enlarged cisterna magna were excluded. All participants were categorized into two groups according to the presence of other abnormalities: isolated and non-isolated PFMs groups. Different combined approaches, including karyotype analysis, CNV testing, and trio-based WES, were used for genetic analysis. The detection rates of karyotype analysis, CNV testing, and WES were measured in the isolated and non-isolated groups.
In isolated PFMs, pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNVs were detected in four cases (36.36%, 4/11), whereas G-banding karyotyping and WES showed negative results. In non-isolated PFMs, a sequential genetic approach showed a detection rate of 47.5% (19/40); karyotyping revealed aneuploidies in five cases (16.67%, 5/30), CNV testing showed P/LP CNVs in five cases (16.13%, 5/31), and WES identified P/LP variants (in genes CEP20, TMEM67, OFD1, PTPN11, ARID1A, and SMARCA4) in nine cases (40.91%, 9/22). WES showed a detection rate of 83.33% (5/6) in fetuses with Joubert syndrome. Only six patients (five with Blake's pouch cyst and one with unilateral cerebellar hemisphere dysplasia) survived.
We recommend CNV testing for fetuses with isolated PFMs. A sequential genetic approach (karyotyping, CNV testing, and WES) may be beneficial in fetuses with non-isolated PFMs. Particularly, we recommend WES as the first-line genetic diagnostic tool for Joubert syndrome.
后颅窝畸形(PFM)是一种相对罕见的产前脑畸形。包括染色体核型分析、拷贝数变异(CNV)检测和全外显子组测序(WES)在内的基因诊断方法已应用于多例胎儿结构畸形病例。然而,针对不同类型PFM的合适基因诊断方法的临床价值尚未得到证实。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在分析不同联合基因诊断方法对各种类型胎儿PFM的价值。
本回顾性研究在北京妇产医院、首都医科大学附属北京妇幼保健院进行。纳入了2017年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间在我院接受基因检测且被诊断为胎儿PFM的51名孕妇;孤立性大枕大池的孕妇被排除。所有参与者根据是否存在其他异常分为两组:孤立性和非孤立性PFM组。采用不同的联合方法,包括核型分析、CNV检测和三联体WES进行基因分析。测量孤立性和非孤立性组中核型分析、CNV检测和WES的检出率。
在孤立性PFM中,4例(36.36%,4/11)检测到致病性/可能致病性(P/LP)CNV,而G显带核型分析和WES结果为阴性。在非孤立性PFM中,序贯基因检测方法的检出率为47.5%(19/40);核型分析发现5例(16.67%,5/30)存在非整倍体,CNV检测显示5例(16.13%,5/31)存在P/LP CNV,WES在9例(40.91%,9/22)中鉴定出P/LP变异(基因CEP20、TMEM67、OFD1、PTPN11、ARID1A和SMARCA4)。WES在患有Joubert综合征的胎儿中的检出率为83.33%(5/6)。仅6例患者存活(5例为Blake囊肿,1例为单侧小脑半球发育不良)。
对于孤立性PFM胎儿,我们推荐进行CNV检测。序贯基因检测方法(核型分析、CNV检测和WES)可能对非孤立性PFM胎儿有益。特别是,我们推荐WES作为Joubert综合征的一线基因诊断工具。