Freiburg, Germany.
J Anal Psychol. 2024 Sep;69(4):602-619. doi: 10.1111/1468-5922.13031. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
All contemporary psychotherapies agree that (failing) emotion regulation is central to psychological disorders and that psychotherapy is about improving emotion regulation. In his research on the "emotion-laden" complex Jung put an emphasis on the role of failing emotion regulation in contributing to psychological disorders as well as to change in the process of psychotherapy, but he left this field of research and took a very different direction in favour of his archetype concept. Psychodynamic approaches generally argue that changes in emotion regulation are accomplished through corrective emotional experiences in the therapeutic relationship. Insights from affective neurosciences and attachment research have had a major influence on how the therapeutic relationship is constructed in contemporary psychodynamic approaches. There is a lack of similar developments in analytical psychology, which leads to substantial differences between the models of Jungian psychotherapy in contrast to other contemporary psychodynamic approaches. The implications of these differences for the practice of psychotherapy and especially the role of the therapeutic relationship are pointed out.
所有当代心理治疗流派都认为(情绪)调节失败是心理障碍的核心,而心理治疗则是关于改善情绪调节的。荣格在他对“充满情感”的情结的研究中,强调了情绪调节失败在导致心理障碍以及心理治疗过程中的变化方面所起的作用,但他离开了这个研究领域,转而支持他的原型概念。心理动力学方法通常认为,情绪调节的变化是通过治疗关系中的纠正性情感体验来实现的。情感神经科学和依恋研究的见解对当代心理动力学方法中治疗关系的构建产生了重大影响。在分析心理学中,没有类似的发展,这导致了荣格心理治疗模式与其他当代心理动力学方法之间存在显著差异。这些差异对心理治疗实践的影响,尤其是治疗关系的作用,都被指出了。