McGinty Giovanna, Przemioslo Robert
Department of Gastroenterology, North Bristol Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, United Kingdom.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, North Bristol Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, United Kingdom.
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 21;30(27):3264-3267. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i27.3264.
In this editorial, we comment on the article by Chen recently published in 2024. We focus the debate on whether reducing the upper limit of normal of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) would effectively identify cases of fibrosis in metabolic-dysfunction associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). This is important given the increasing prevalence of MAFLD and obesity globally. Currently, a suitable screening test to identify patients in the general population does not exist and most patients are screened after the finding of an abnormal ALT. The authors of this paper challenge the idea of what a normal ALT is and whether that threshold should be lowered, particularly as their study found that 83.12% of their study population with a diagnosis of MAFLD had a normal ALT. The main advantages of screening would be to identify patients and provide intervention early, the mainstay of this being changing modifiable risk factors and monitoring for liver fibrosis. However, there is not enough suitable therapeutic options available as of yet although this is likely to change in the coming years with more targets for therapy being discovered. Semaglutide is one example of this which has demonstrated benefit with an acceptable side effect profile for those patients with MAFLD and obesity, although studies have not yet shown a significant improvement in fibrosis regression. It would also require a huge amount of resource if a reduced ALT level alone was used as criteria; it is more likely that current scoring systems such as fibrosis-4 may be amended to represent this additional risk. Currently, there is not a good argument to recommend widespread screening with a reduced ALT level as this is unlikely to be cost-effective. This is compounded by the fact that there is a significant heterogeneity in what is considered a normal ALT between laboratories. Although studies previously have suggested a more pragmatic approach in screening those over the age of 60, this is likely to change with the increasing incidence of obesity within the younger age groups. The main message from this study is that those who have hypercholesterolemia and high body metabolic index should have these risk factors modified to maintain a lower level of ALT to reduce the risk of progression to fibrosis and cirrhosis.
在这篇社论中,我们对陈等人最近于2024年发表的文章发表评论。我们将辩论焦点集中在降低丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)正常上限是否能有效识别代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病(MAFLD)中的纤维化病例。鉴于全球MAFLD和肥胖症患病率不断上升,这一点很重要。目前,尚不存在适用于普通人群的合适筛查测试,大多数患者是在发现ALT异常后才接受筛查。本文作者对正常ALT的概念以及该阈值是否应降低提出质疑,特别是因为他们的研究发现,在其诊断为MAFLD的研究人群中,83.12%的人ALT正常。筛查的主要优势在于识别患者并尽早提供干预,主要方式是改变可改变的风险因素并监测肝纤维化。然而,目前尚无足够合适的治疗选择,尽管随着未来几年发现更多治疗靶点,这种情况可能会改变。司美格鲁肽就是一个例子,它已证明对患有MAFLD和肥胖症的患者有益,且副作用可接受,尽管研究尚未显示纤维化逆转有显著改善。如果仅将降低的ALT水平用作标准,还需要大量资源;更有可能的是,当前的评分系统如Fibrosis-4可能会进行修订以体现这种额外风险。目前,没有充分理由推荐以降低的ALT水平进行广泛筛查,因为这可能不具有成本效益。实验室之间对于正常ALT的认定存在显著异质性,这使情况更加复杂。尽管之前的研究建议对60岁以上人群采用更务实的筛查方法,但随着年轻人群中肥胖症发病率的上升,这种情况可能会改变。这项研究的主要信息是,患有高胆固醇血症和高身体代谢指数的人应改变这些风险因素,以维持较低的ALT水平,降低进展为纤维化和肝硬化的风险。