Shaikh Humza S, Mohammad Saad, Petersen Tyler D, Cotman Steven, Siska Peter A
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 30;16(6):e63537. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63537. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Post-traumatic arthritis is a common sequelae after undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acetabular fractures. This often necessitates conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) to help alleviate pain and improve function for these patients. Unfortunately, dislocation rates for post-traumatic THA have been alarmingly high especially when the posterior approach has been used. In the setting of prior soft tissue disruption, the theoretical risk of dislocation is even greater. Conversely, the lateral or the abductor-split approach (Hardinge) is associated with decreased dislocation rates. In this retrospective case series, we evaluated the dislocation rate of the Hardinge approach on patients who underwent THA after developing post-traumatic arthritis after acetabulum ORIF. All patients who matched CPT code 27132 (Repair, Revision, and/or Reconstruction Procedures on the Pelvis and Hip Joint), from January 2009 to December 2019, and treated by the senior author, were pulled from the electronic medical record at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Thirty-one of the resultant 110 were treated with THA for post-traumatic arthrosis through a lateral, abductor-splitting Hardinge approach and met the inclusion criteria for further study. Our case series involves 31 patients who underwent post-traumatic THA through a Hardinge approach: the mean age at the time of index acetabular ORIF is 48.5 years, the mean age at the time of THA is 53.5 years, and the mean interval between ORIF and ultimate THA was five years. The mean length of follow-up after THA was 22.4 months. Overall, patients did well with an all-cause revision rate of 9.7%, with no revision performed for loosening of either the acetabular or femoral component. One patient developed an infection. No patient in our group sustained a dislocation, and all implants were stable without evidence of radiographic loosening at the final follow-up. This study found satisfactory results with patients undergoing THA via lateral or abductor split approach (Hardinge) for post-traumatic arthritis after acetabular ORIF. The use of a Hardinge approach for post-traumatic reconstruction of the hip may be protective against dislocation without increasing baseline risks in this difficult patient population.
创伤后关节炎是髋臼骨折切开复位内固定术(ORIF)后常见的后遗症。对于这些患者,这通常需要转换为全髋关节置换术(THA)以帮助减轻疼痛并改善功能。不幸的是,创伤后THA的脱位率一直高得惊人,尤其是在采用后入路时。在先前存在软组织损伤的情况下,脱位的理论风险甚至更大。相反,外侧或臀中肌劈开入路(哈丁格入路)与较低的脱位率相关。在这个回顾性病例系列中,我们评估了哈丁格入路在髋臼ORIF后发生创伤后关节炎并接受THA的患者中的脱位率。从2009年1月至2019年12月,所有符合CPT代码27132(骨盆和髋关节的修复、翻修和/或重建手术)且由资深作者治疗的患者均从匹兹堡大学医学中心的电子病历中提取。在最终的110例患者中,有31例通过外侧臀中肌劈开哈丁格入路接受了创伤后关节炎的THA治疗,并符合进一步研究的纳入标准。我们的病例系列包括31例通过哈丁格入路接受创伤后THA的患者:初次髋臼ORIF时的平均年龄为48.5岁,THA时的平均年龄为53.5岁,ORIF与最终THA之间的平均间隔为5年。THA后的平均随访时间为22.4个月。总体而言,患者情况良好,全因翻修率为9.7%,没有因髋臼或股骨假体松动而进行翻修。有1例患者发生感染。我们组中没有患者发生脱位,并且在最后一次随访时所有植入物均稳定,没有影像学松动的证据。本研究发现,对于髋臼ORIF后创伤后关节炎患者,采用外侧或臀中肌劈开入路(哈丁格入路)进行THA可获得满意结果。在这个困难的患者群体中,使用哈丁格入路进行创伤后髋关节重建可能有助于防止脱位,而不会增加基线风险。