• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health Equity Considerations for Children With Type 1 Diabetes Who Utilize Insulin Cost-Sharing Cap Programs.对使用胰岛素费用分摊上限计划的1型糖尿病儿童的健康公平性考量
Cureus. 2024 Jul 1;16(7):e63588. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63588. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Out-of-Pocket Costs of Insulin and Diabetes-Related Supplies Among Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病患者胰岛素及糖尿病相关用品的自付费用
Clin Ther. 2021 Jul;43(7):1272-1277. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
3
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational drug use.药品政策:封顶支付和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.
4
5
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational use of medicines.药品政策:封顶价和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 8;2015(5):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.pub2.
6
Assessment of racial and ethnic inequities in copay card utilization and enrollment in copay adjustment programs.评估种族和民族在 copay 卡使用和 copay 调整计划参与方面的不平等现象。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Sep;29(9):1084-1092. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.23021. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
7
8
Association of State Insulin Out-of-Pocket Caps With Insulin Cost-Sharing and Use Among Commercially Insured Patients With Diabetes : A Pre-Post Study With a Control Group.州胰岛素自付上限与商业保险糖尿病患者胰岛素费用分担和使用的关联:一项有对照组的前后研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Apr;177(4):439-448. doi: 10.7326/M23-1965. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
9
The effectiveness of web-based programs on the reduction of childhood obesity in school-aged children: A systematic review.基于网络的项目对学龄儿童肥胖症减轻的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-14. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-248.
10
Effects of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act on Specialty Outpatient Behavioral Health Spending and Utilization.《精神健康平权与成瘾公平法案》对专科门诊行为健康支出及使用情况的影响
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2018 Sep 1;21(3):91-103.

引用本文的文献

1
Financial Toxicity in Diabetes: The State of What We Know.糖尿病中的经济毒性:我们所知的现状。
Curr Diab Rep. 2025 May 13;25(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s11892-025-01588-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Commercial and Mandatory Discounts in the Gross-to-Net Bubble for the Top Insulin Products From 2012 to 2019.2012 年至 2019 年期间,顶级胰岛素产品的毛额到净额泡沫中的商业和强制折扣评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2318145. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18145.
2
Diabetes Care Barriers, Use, and Health Outcomes in Younger Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.1 型和 2 型糖尿病年轻患者的糖尿病护理障碍、使用情况和健康结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2312147. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12147.
3
Association of Acute Kidney Injury During Diabetic Ketoacidosis With Risk of Microalbuminuria in Children With Type 1 Diabetes.糖尿病酮症酸中毒期间急性肾损伤与 1 型糖尿病儿童微量白蛋白尿风险的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Feb 1;176(2):169-175. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.5038.
4
Socioeconomic and Racial Disparities in Diabetic Ketoacidosis Admissions in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病青少年糖尿病酮症酸中毒入院情况中的社会经济和种族差异
J Hosp Med. 2021 Aug 18. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3664.
5
Racial disparities in treatment and outcomes of children with type 1 diabetes.种族差异对 1 型糖尿病患儿治疗和结局的影响。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 Mar;22(2):241-248. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13139. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
6
Cognitive Function Following Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Children With New-Onset or Previously Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes.新发或既往诊断为1型糖尿病的儿童糖尿病酮症酸中毒后的认知功能
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2768-2775. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0187. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
7
Potential Change in Insulin Out-of-Pocket Spending Under Cost-Sharing Caps Among Pediatric Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.在成本分担上限下,1 型糖尿病儿科患者胰岛素自付费用的潜在变化。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Jan 1;175(1):90-92. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1065.
8
Variation in resource use and readmission for diabetic ketoacidosis in children's hospitals.儿童医院中儿童糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者的资源利用和再入院情况存在差异。
Pediatrics. 2013 Aug;132(2):229-36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0359. Epub 2013 Jul 22.

对使用胰岛素费用分摊上限计划的1型糖尿病儿童的健康公平性考量

Health Equity Considerations for Children With Type 1 Diabetes Who Utilize Insulin Cost-Sharing Cap Programs.

作者信息

DeWitt Katie, Bjornstad Petter, Bergmann Kelly R

机构信息

Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

Medicine, University of Washington (UW) Medicine Diabetes Institute, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 1;16(7):e63588. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63588. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.63588
PMID:39087202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11290402/
Abstract

The cost associated with type 1 diabetes care is considerable and the rising price of insulin has further amplified this financial burden. To curb insulin costs, numerous policies have been enacted in the past five years, both by pharmaceutical companies and their intermediaries, as well as federal and state legislatures. The most notable example is implementation of insulin cost-sharing cap laws, which place limits on out-of-pocket expenses for insulin, and in some cases, diabetes technology. Although insulin cost-sharing cap laws have the potential to mitigate the financial burden associated with routine diabetes care, these policies have largely benefitted adults living with type 1 diabetes, while children, especially those from racial and ethnic underrepresented groups, appear to have derived limited advantage. We describe the current state of insulin cost-sharing cap laws and utilization among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, with a focus on the limitations of current insulin laws, the importance of measuring health outcomes for children who utilize such programs, and the impact on health equity. We provide a call to action for policymakers and provide recommendations for future research in this area.

摘要

1型糖尿病护理的相关成本相当高昂,胰岛素价格的上涨进一步加剧了这一经济负担。为了控制胰岛素成本,在过去五年里,制药公司及其中间商以及联邦和州立法机构都制定了许多政策。最显著的例子是实施胰岛素费用分摊上限法律,该法律对胰岛素的自付费用进行限制,在某些情况下,还包括糖尿病治疗技术的费用。尽管胰岛素费用分摊上限法律有可能减轻与常规糖尿病护理相关的经济负担,但这些政策在很大程度上使成年1型糖尿病患者受益,而儿童,尤其是来自种族和族裔代表性不足群体的儿童,似乎受益有限。我们描述了胰岛素费用分摊上限法律以及1型糖尿病儿童和青少年的使用现状,重点关注当前胰岛素法律的局限性、衡量使用此类项目儿童健康结果的重要性以及对健康公平性的影响。我们呼吁政策制定者采取行动,并为该领域未来的研究提供建议。