Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ.
Real-World Evidence, IQVIA, Cambridge, MA.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Sep;29(9):1084-1092. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.23021. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
Increases in consumer cost sharing lead to decreases in the use of both high- and low-value care. Copay assistance was designed to reduce out-of-pocket (OOP) cost burden. Commercial insurers have recently instituted copay adjustment programs (CAPs), which exclude copay assistance from deductibles and OOP cost maximums, thereby effectively increasing the financial burden on patients. The utilization of these programs by specific demographic populations is unknown. To assess utilization of copay assistance and CAP exposure in a commercially insured patient population and examine potential differences in the use of each of these programs by non-White and by White patients. A retrospective, cross-sectional study using IQVIA Longitudinal Access and Adjudication Data, linked to Experian Marketing Solutions, LLC consumer data, identified unique patients who were younger than 65 years, covered by commercial insurance, had at least 1 pharmacy claim for treatment within prespecified therapeutic areas, and had full financial data visibility on paid claims (ie, nonmissing data on costs associated with the pharmacy claim and the secondary payer) between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2021. Analyses of copay card use or CAP exposure (defined as the likelihood to be included in the accumulator or maximizer program) between non-White and White patient populations were adjusted for age, gender, household income, patient state of residence, pharmacy benefit manager, state-level CAP policy, and overall drug cost. In total, 4,073,599 unique patients (5.6% of the total database population) were included in the copay card analysis. In adjusted analyses, there were no significant differences in copay card utilization between non-White patients and White patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.995, 95% CI = 0.99-1.00; = 0.0964). However, among copay card users, non-White patients were significantly more likely to be exposed to CAPs, as either maximizers (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.22-1.33; < 0.0001) or accumulators (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.26-1.36; < 0.0001), compared with White patients. In an adjusted analysis of this selected sample of a commercially insured population, there was no difference in the use of copay cards between non-White and White patients. CAP exposure, however, was significantly higher among non-White patients. This increased exposure suggests a disproportionate effect due to this reduction in copay assistance benefits, which has the potential to exacerbate racial and ethnic disparities in access to medications. This study was sponsored by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Mr Ingham, Dr Sadik, and Dr Song are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Dr Zhao is an employee of IQVIA. Dr Fendrick is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield, Centivo, Community Oncology Association, Covered California, EmblemHealth, Exact Sciences, Freedman Health, GRAIL, Harvard University, Health & Wellness Innovations, Health at Scale Technologies, HealthCorum, Hygeia, MedsIncontext, MedZed, Merck, Mercer, Montana Health Cooperative, Pair Team, Penguin Pay, Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Proton Intelligence, Risalto Health, Risk International, Sempre Health, Silver Fern Health, State of Minnesota, Teladoc Health, US Department of Defense, Virginia Center for Health Innovation, Wellth, Wildflower Health, Yale New Haven Health System, and Zansors; received research funds from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gary and Mary West Health Policy Center, Arnold Ventures, National Pharmaceutical Council, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), Robert Wood Johnson (RWJ) Foundation, State of Michigan/The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS); and has an outside position at the American Journal of Managed Care (AJMC; co-editor), Medicare Evidence Development & Coverage Advisory Committee (MEDCAC) member, VBID Health (partner).
消费者自付费用的增加会导致高价值和低价值医疗服务使用量的减少。共同支付援助旨在减轻自付费用负担。商业保险公司最近实施了共同支付调整计划(CAP),将共付援助排除在免赔额和自付费用上限之外,从而实际上增加了患者的经济负担。目前还不知道这些计划在特定人群中的使用情况。本研究旨在评估商业保险患者群体中共同支付援助和 CAP 暴露的使用情况,并检查非白人和白人患者对这些计划的使用是否存在潜在差异。这是一项使用 IQVIA 纵向获取和裁决数据,与 Experian 营销解决方案有限责任公司消费者数据相关联的回顾性、横断面研究,确定了年龄小于 65 岁、有商业保险、至少有 1 项规定治疗领域内的药房索赔,以及在 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 30 日期间对已付索赔有完整财务数据可见性(即药房索赔和第二付款人相关费用的缺失数据)的独特患者。对非白人和白人患者群体中共同支付卡使用或 CAP 暴露(定义为被纳入累加器或最大化程序的可能性)进行分析,并调整年龄、性别、家庭收入、患者居住地、药房福利经理、州级 CAP 政策和总体药物成本。共有 4073599 名独特患者(数据库总人群的 5.6%)纳入共同支付卡分析。在调整分析中,非白人和白人患者之间的共同支付卡使用率没有显著差异(比值比[OR] = 0.995,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.99-1.00; = 0.0964)。然而,在共同支付卡使用者中,非白人患者更有可能接触到 CAP,无论是最大化者(OR = 1.27,95%CI = 1.22-1.33; < 0.0001)还是累加器(OR = 1.31,95%CI = 1.26-1.36; < 0.0001),与白人患者相比。在对商业保险人群中这一选定样本的调整分析中,非白人和白人患者之间使用共同支付卡没有差异。然而,非白人患者的 CAP 暴露率明显更高。这种增加的暴露表明,由于这种共同支付援助福利的减少,可能会产生不成比例的影响,从而加剧在获得药物方面的种族和民族差异。本研究由杨森科学事务有限责任公司赞助。Ingham 先生、Sadik 博士和 Song 博士是杨森科学事务有限责任公司的员工。Zhao 博士是 IQVIA 的员工。Fendrick 博士为 AbbVie、Amgen、Bayer、CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield、Centivo、社区肿瘤学协会、Covered California、EmblemHealth、Exact Sciences、Freedman Health、GRAIL、哈佛大学、健康与福利创新、健康规模技术、HealthCorum、Hygeia、MedsIncontext、MedZed、Merck、Mercer、蒙大拿健康合作、Pair Team、Penguin Pay、Phathom Pharmaceuticals、Proton Intelligence、Risolto 健康、风险国际、Sempre 健康、Silver Fern 健康、明尼苏达州、Teladoc 健康、美国国防部、弗吉尼亚州健康创新中心、Wellth、Wildflower Health、耶鲁纽黑文健康系统和 Zansors 担任顾问;获得了美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)、勃林格殷格翰、加里和玛丽韦斯特卫生政策中心、阿诺德风险投资公司、国家药品理事会、患者为中心的成果研究所(PCORI)、制药研究和制造商协会(PhRMA)、罗伯特伍德约翰逊基金会、密歇根州/医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的研究资金;并在外兼职美国管理式医疗杂志(AJMC;共同编辑)、医疗保险证据开发和覆盖咨询委员会(MEDCAC)成员、VBID 健康(合作伙伴)。