• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessment of racial and ethnic inequities in copay card utilization and enrollment in copay adjustment programs.评估种族和民族在 copay 卡使用和 copay 调整计划参与方面的不平等现象。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Sep;29(9):1084-1092. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.23021. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
2
Letter--Assessing the Effectiveness of V-BID Implementations.信件——评估 V-BID 实施的效果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Sep;25(9):1026-1027. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.9.1026.
3
Patient Support Program Increased Medication Adherence with Lower Total Health Care Costs Despite Increased Drug Spending.患者支持计划提高了药物依从性,降低了总体医疗保健成本,尽管药物支出增加了。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jul;25(7):770-779. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.18443. Epub 2019 May 11.
4
Sustained long-term benefits of patient support program participation in immune-mediated diseases: improved medication-taking behavior and lower risk of a hospital visit.患者支持计划参与对免疫介导性疾病的长期持续获益:改善用药行为,降低住院风险。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Aug;27(8):1086-1095. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.20560. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
5
Copay assistance use and prescription abandonment across race, ethnicity, or household income levels for select rheumatoid arthritis and oral oncolytic medicines.选择类风湿关节炎和口服肿瘤溶解药物的种族、民族或家庭收入水平的共付援助使用和处方放弃情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Mar;29(3):324-334. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.22288. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
6
Real-world persistence and costs among patients with chronic migraine treated with onabotulinumtoxinA or calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies.慢性偏头痛患者接受肉毒毒素 A 或降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体治疗的真实世界持久性和成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Oct;29(10):1119-1128. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.10.1119.
7
Low-Cost Generic Program Use by Medicare Beneficiaries: Implications for Medication Exposure Misclassification in Administrative Claims Data.医疗保险受益人的低成本通用药物计划使用:对行政索赔数据中药物暴露错误分类的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jun;22(6):741-51. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.6.741.
8
Patient perceptions of copay card utilization and policies.患者对自付费用卡使用情况及政策的认知。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023 Sep 7;11(1):2254586. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2254586. eCollection 2023.
9
Characterizing patient assistance program use and patient responsiveness to specialty drug price for multiple sclerosis in a mid-size integrated health system.描述在一个中等规模的综合性医疗体系中,多发性硬化症患者援助计划的使用情况和患者对 specialty drug 价格的反应。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jun;27(6):732-742. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.6.732.
10
Clinical and economic burdens of recurrence following nephrectomy for intermediate high- or high-risk renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data.肾细胞癌肾切除术后复发的临床和经济负担:监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据的回顾性分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Oct;28(10):1149-1160. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.22133. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing the conversation: 30 years of scholarship in managed care pharmacy.推动对话:管理式医疗药学30年学术研究
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Jul;31(7):617-626. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.7.617.
2
Patient liability, treatment adherence, and treatment persistence associated with state bans of copay accumulator adjustment programs.患者责任、治疗依从性和治疗持久性与各州禁止共付额累加调整计划有关。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Sep;30(9):909-916. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.9.909.
3
Racial and social inequities in medication use: A review of articles responding to the + 's Call to Action.药物使用中的种族和社会不平等:回应 + 行动呼吁的文章综述。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Jul;30(7):736-746. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.736.
4
Treatment patterns and hospitalizations following rejection, reversal, or payment of the initial once-monthly paliperidone palmitate long-acting injectable antipsychotic claim among patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者在发生排斥、逆转或支付初始每月一次的棕榈酸帕利哌酮长效注射抗精神病药索赔后,其治疗模式和住院情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Sep;30(9):954-966. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.23252. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
5
Advances in prosthetic technology: a perspective on ethical considerations for development and clinical translation.假肢技术的进展:关于开发与临床转化的伦理考量视角
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jan 16;4:1335966. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1335966. eCollection 2023.
6
Patient perceptions of copay card utilization and policies.患者对自付费用卡使用情况及政策的认知。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023 Sep 7;11(1):2254586. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2254586. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The Health Costs of Cost Sharing.成本分摊的健康成本。
Q J Econ. 2024 May 3;139(4):2037-2082. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjae015. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
CAAP rule and prescription drug prices.医保支付咨询委员会规则与处方药价格。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Aug;27(8):312-314. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88613.
3
Utilization Impact of Cost-Sharing Elimination for Preventive Care Services: A Rapid Review.消除预防性保健服务费用分担的利用影响:快速综述
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Apr;79(2):175-197. doi: 10.1177/10775587211027372. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
Impact of a co-pay accumulator adjustment program on specialty drug adherence.共付额累加器调整方案对专科药物治疗依从性的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jul;25(7):335-340.
5
Value-Based Insurance Design Improves Medication Adherence Without An Increase In Total Health Care Spending.基于价值的保险设计可提高药物依从性,而不会增加总体医疗保健支出。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jul;37(7):1057-1064. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1633.
6
Undermining Value-Based Purchasing - Lessons from the Pharmaceutical Industry.破坏基于价值的采购——制药行业的教训
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 24;375(21):2013-2015. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607378. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
7
Medication adherence and healthcare disparities: impact of statin co-payment reduction.药物依从性与医疗保健差异:他汀类药物共付额降低的影响
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Oct;21(10):696-704.
8
Drug companies' patient-assistance programs--helping patients or profits?制药公司的患者援助项目——是帮助患者还是追逐利润?
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 10;371(2):97-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1401658.
9
Eliminating medication copayments reduces disparities in cardiovascular care.消除药物自付费用可减少心血管护理方面的差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 May;33(5):863-70. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0654.
10
Effects of increased patient cost sharing on socioeconomic disparities in health care.增加患者自付费用对医疗保健中社会经济差异的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Aug;23(8):1131-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0614-0. Epub 2008 Apr 29.

评估种族和民族在 copay 卡使用和 copay 调整计划参与方面的不平等现象。

Assessment of racial and ethnic inequities in copay card utilization and enrollment in copay adjustment programs.

机构信息

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ.

Real-World Evidence, IQVIA, Cambridge, MA.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Sep;29(9):1084-1092. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.23021. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2023.23021
PMID:37548953
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10510673/
Abstract

Increases in consumer cost sharing lead to decreases in the use of both high- and low-value care. Copay assistance was designed to reduce out-of-pocket (OOP) cost burden. Commercial insurers have recently instituted copay adjustment programs (CAPs), which exclude copay assistance from deductibles and OOP cost maximums, thereby effectively increasing the financial burden on patients. The utilization of these programs by specific demographic populations is unknown. To assess utilization of copay assistance and CAP exposure in a commercially insured patient population and examine potential differences in the use of each of these programs by non-White and by White patients. A retrospective, cross-sectional study using IQVIA Longitudinal Access and Adjudication Data, linked to Experian Marketing Solutions, LLC consumer data, identified unique patients who were younger than 65 years, covered by commercial insurance, had at least 1 pharmacy claim for treatment within prespecified therapeutic areas, and had full financial data visibility on paid claims (ie, nonmissing data on costs associated with the pharmacy claim and the secondary payer) between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2021. Analyses of copay card use or CAP exposure (defined as the likelihood to be included in the accumulator or maximizer program) between non-White and White patient populations were adjusted for age, gender, household income, patient state of residence, pharmacy benefit manager, state-level CAP policy, and overall drug cost. In total, 4,073,599 unique patients (5.6% of the total database population) were included in the copay card analysis. In adjusted analyses, there were no significant differences in copay card utilization between non-White patients and White patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.995, 95% CI = 0.99-1.00; = 0.0964). However, among copay card users, non-White patients were significantly more likely to be exposed to CAPs, as either maximizers (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.22-1.33; < 0.0001) or accumulators (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.26-1.36; < 0.0001), compared with White patients. In an adjusted analysis of this selected sample of a commercially insured population, there was no difference in the use of copay cards between non-White and White patients. CAP exposure, however, was significantly higher among non-White patients. This increased exposure suggests a disproportionate effect due to this reduction in copay assistance benefits, which has the potential to exacerbate racial and ethnic disparities in access to medications. This study was sponsored by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Mr Ingham, Dr Sadik, and Dr Song are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Dr Zhao is an employee of IQVIA. Dr Fendrick is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield, Centivo, Community Oncology Association, Covered California, EmblemHealth, Exact Sciences, Freedman Health, GRAIL, Harvard University, Health & Wellness Innovations, Health at Scale Technologies, HealthCorum, Hygeia, MedsIncontext, MedZed, Merck, Mercer, Montana Health Cooperative, Pair Team, Penguin Pay, Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Proton Intelligence, Risalto Health, Risk International, Sempre Health, Silver Fern Health, State of Minnesota, Teladoc Health, US Department of Defense, Virginia Center for Health Innovation, Wellth, Wildflower Health, Yale New Haven Health System, and Zansors; received research funds from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gary and Mary West Health Policy Center, Arnold Ventures, National Pharmaceutical Council, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), Robert Wood Johnson (RWJ) Foundation, State of Michigan/The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS); and has an outside position at the American Journal of Managed Care (AJMC; co-editor), Medicare Evidence Development & Coverage Advisory Committee (MEDCAC) member, VBID Health (partner).

摘要

消费者自付费用的增加会导致高价值和低价值医疗服务使用量的减少。共同支付援助旨在减轻自付费用负担。商业保险公司最近实施了共同支付调整计划(CAP),将共付援助排除在免赔额和自付费用上限之外,从而实际上增加了患者的经济负担。目前还不知道这些计划在特定人群中的使用情况。本研究旨在评估商业保险患者群体中共同支付援助和 CAP 暴露的使用情况,并检查非白人和白人患者对这些计划的使用是否存在潜在差异。这是一项使用 IQVIA 纵向获取和裁决数据,与 Experian 营销解决方案有限责任公司消费者数据相关联的回顾性、横断面研究,确定了年龄小于 65 岁、有商业保险、至少有 1 项规定治疗领域内的药房索赔,以及在 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 30 日期间对已付索赔有完整财务数据可见性(即药房索赔和第二付款人相关费用的缺失数据)的独特患者。对非白人和白人患者群体中共同支付卡使用或 CAP 暴露(定义为被纳入累加器或最大化程序的可能性)进行分析,并调整年龄、性别、家庭收入、患者居住地、药房福利经理、州级 CAP 政策和总体药物成本。共有 4073599 名独特患者(数据库总人群的 5.6%)纳入共同支付卡分析。在调整分析中,非白人和白人患者之间的共同支付卡使用率没有显著差异(比值比[OR] = 0.995,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.99-1.00; = 0.0964)。然而,在共同支付卡使用者中,非白人患者更有可能接触到 CAP,无论是最大化者(OR = 1.27,95%CI = 1.22-1.33; < 0.0001)还是累加器(OR = 1.31,95%CI = 1.26-1.36; < 0.0001),与白人患者相比。在对商业保险人群中这一选定样本的调整分析中,非白人和白人患者之间使用共同支付卡没有差异。然而,非白人患者的 CAP 暴露率明显更高。这种增加的暴露表明,由于这种共同支付援助福利的减少,可能会产生不成比例的影响,从而加剧在获得药物方面的种族和民族差异。本研究由杨森科学事务有限责任公司赞助。Ingham 先生、Sadik 博士和 Song 博士是杨森科学事务有限责任公司的员工。Zhao 博士是 IQVIA 的员工。Fendrick 博士为 AbbVie、Amgen、Bayer、CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield、Centivo、社区肿瘤学协会、Covered California、EmblemHealth、Exact Sciences、Freedman Health、GRAIL、哈佛大学、健康与福利创新、健康规模技术、HealthCorum、Hygeia、MedsIncontext、MedZed、Merck、Mercer、蒙大拿健康合作、Pair Team、Penguin Pay、Phathom Pharmaceuticals、Proton Intelligence、Risolto 健康、风险国际、Sempre 健康、Silver Fern 健康、明尼苏达州、Teladoc 健康、美国国防部、弗吉尼亚州健康创新中心、Wellth、Wildflower Health、耶鲁纽黑文健康系统和 Zansors 担任顾问;获得了美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)、勃林格殷格翰、加里和玛丽韦斯特卫生政策中心、阿诺德风险投资公司、国家药品理事会、患者为中心的成果研究所(PCORI)、制药研究和制造商协会(PhRMA)、罗伯特伍德约翰逊基金会、密歇根州/医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的研究资金;并在外兼职美国管理式医疗杂志(AJMC;共同编辑)、医疗保险证据开发和覆盖咨询委员会(MEDCAC)成员、VBID 健康(合作伙伴)。