• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防性抗生素对于常规二氧化碳激光治疗烧伤瘢痕并无必要。

Prophylactic Antibiotics Are Unnecessary for Routine CO2 Laser Burn Scar Treatment.

作者信息

Zilinskas Kasparas, Mittal Rohit, Hollowed Kathleen, Kahn Steven A

机构信息

Department of Burn Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29403, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2025 Jan 24;46(1):178-182. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irae146.

DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irae146
PMID:39087666
Abstract

CO2 ablative fractional laser (CO2 AFL) therapy is a safe and effective procedure when used in the treatment of hypertrophic scars for burn patients. It has a high patient satisfaction rate and a minimal side effect profile, typically consisting of postoperative pain, irritation, surgical site inflammation, and, in rare cases, infection. Although prophylactic antibiotics have historically been recommended, there is a paucity of literature on the topic and recent studies indicate that they may be unnecessary in routine cases. In this retrospective, single-center descriptive study, 230 cases in patients with hypertrophic burn scars treated with CO2 AFL therapy were compared. 28 cases were with the use of prophylactic antibiotics and 201 cases were without the use of prophylactic antibiotics. We found that there was no significant association between the use of antibiotics and the prevention of topical skin infection in cases treated with CO2 AFL therapy (P = 1). Therefore, we conclude that the omission of prophylactic antibiotics is not associated with an increased risk of infection and recommend that prophylactic antibiotics should not be indicated in the setting of routine CO2 AFL therapy for patients with hypertrophic burn scars.

摘要

二氧化碳剥脱性分次激光(CO2 AFL)疗法用于治疗烧伤患者的增生性瘢痕时是一种安全有效的方法。它具有较高的患者满意率,且副作用极小,通常包括术后疼痛、刺激、手术部位炎症,以及罕见的感染。尽管以往一直推荐使用预防性抗生素,但关于这一主题的文献较少,且近期研究表明,在常规病例中可能无需使用。在这项回顾性单中心描述性研究中,对230例接受CO2 AFL疗法治疗的烧伤增生性瘢痕患者进行了比较。28例使用了预防性抗生素,201例未使用预防性抗生素。我们发现,在接受CO2 AFL疗法治疗的病例中,使用抗生素与预防局部皮肤感染之间无显著关联(P = 1)。因此,我们得出结论,不使用预防性抗生素与感染风险增加无关,并建议在对烧伤增生性瘢痕患者进行常规CO2 AFL治疗时不使用预防性抗生素。

相似文献

1
Prophylactic Antibiotics Are Unnecessary for Routine CO2 Laser Burn Scar Treatment.预防性抗生素对于常规二氧化碳激光治疗烧伤瘢痕并无必要。
J Burn Care Res. 2025 Jan 24;46(1):178-182. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irae146.
2
Laser therapy for treating hypertrophic and keloid scars.激光疗法治疗增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD011642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011642.pub2.
3
Lessons Learned Evaluating Ablative Fractional CO2 Laser for Burn-Related Donor Site Scars.评估剥脱性二氧化碳点阵激光治疗烧伤相关供皮区瘢痕的经验教训
J Burn Care Res. 2025 Aug 30;46(4):708-724. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraf030.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
The efficacy of fractional CO laser with or without triamcinolone acetonide or 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of early postburn hypertrophic scars.分次二氧化碳激光联合或不联合曲安奈德或5-氟尿嘧啶治疗烧伤后早期增生性瘢痕的疗效。
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Jan 23;40(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04256-z.
6
Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection.预防烧伤创面感染的抗生素预防用药
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD008738. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008738.pub2.
7
Antiseptics for burns.烧伤用防腐剂
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):CD011821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011821.pub2.
8
Application of punch excision in the treatment of severe burn scars.冲压切除在严重烧伤瘢痕治疗中的应用。
Burns. 2025 Sep;51(7):107578. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107578. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
9
Interventions for acne scars.痤疮瘢痕的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 3;4(4):CD011946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011946.pub2.
10
Pressure-garment therapy for preventing hypertrophic scarring after burn injury.压力衣治疗烧伤后预防增生性瘢痕。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD013530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013530.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Toxic epidermal necrolysis induced by moxifloxacin and exacerbated by clindamycin in an elderly patient: A case report.莫西沙星诱导并由克林霉素加重的老年患者中毒性表皮坏死松解症:一例报告
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 3;12:1527051. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1527051. eCollection 2025.
2
Update on Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Diagnosis and Management.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的最新进展:诊断与治疗。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2024 Nov;25(6):891-908. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00889-6. Epub 2024 Sep 15.