Rousseau Anne-Françoise, Martindale Robert
Intensive Care Department, University Hospital of Liège, University of Liège, Avenue de l'Hôpital, 1/B35, Liège, B-4000, Belgium.
GIGA-I3 Thematic Unit, Inflammation and Enhanced Rehabilitation Laboratory (Intensive Care), GIGA-Research, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Aug 1;14(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01350-x.
Inflammation is the hallmark of critical illness and triggers the neuro-endocrine stress response and an oxidative stress. Acute inflammation is initially essential for patient's survival. However, ongoing or exaggerated inflammation, due to persistent organ dysfunction, immune dysfunction or poor inflammation resolution, is associated to subsequent hypermetabolism and hypercatabolism that severely impact short and long-term functional status, autonomy, as well as health-related costs. Modulation of inflammation is thus tempting, with the goal to improve the short- and long-term outcomes of critically ill patients.
Inflammation can be modulated by nutritional strategies (including the timing of enteral nutrition initiation, the provision of some specific macronutrients or micronutrients, the use of probiotics) and metabolic treatments. The most interesting strategies seem to be n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, vitamin D, antioxidant micronutrients and propranolol, given their safety, their accessibility for clinical use, and their benefits in clinical studies in the specific context of critical care. However, the optimal doses, timing and route of administration are still unknown for most of them. Furthermore, their use in the recovery phase is not well studied and defined.
The rationale to use strategies of inflammation modulation is obvious, based on critical illness pathophysiology and based on the increasingly described effects of some nutritional and pharmacological strategies. Regretfully, there isn't always substantial proof from clinical research regarding the positive impacts directly brought about by inflammation modulation. Some arguments come from studies performed in severe burn patients, but such results should be transposed to non-burn patients with caution. Further studies are needed to explore how the modulation of inflammation can improve the long-term outcomes after a critical illness.
炎症是危重病的标志,可引发神经内分泌应激反应和氧化应激。急性炎症最初对患者的生存至关重要。然而,由于持续的器官功能障碍、免疫功能障碍或炎症消退不佳导致的持续或过度炎症,与随后的高代谢和高分解代谢相关,这严重影响短期和长期功能状态、自主性以及与健康相关的费用。因此,调节炎症很有吸引力,目标是改善危重病患者的短期和长期预后。
炎症可通过营养策略(包括肠内营养开始的时机、提供某些特定的宏量营养素或微量营养素、使用益生菌)和代谢治疗来调节。最有前景的策略似乎是n-3多不饱和脂肪酸、维生素D、抗氧化微量营养素和普萘洛尔,鉴于它们的安全性、临床应用的可及性以及在重症监护特定背景下的临床研究中的益处。然而,它们大多数的最佳剂量、给药时间和途径仍不清楚。此外,它们在恢复阶段的使用尚未得到充分研究和明确。
基于危重病病理生理学以及一些营养和药理学策略日益被描述的效果,使用炎症调节策略的基本原理是显而易见 的。遗憾的是,临床研究并不总是有充分证据证明炎症调节直接带来的积极影响。一些证据来自对重度烧伤患者进行的研究,但此类结果应谨慎推广至非烧伤患者。需要进一步研究以探索炎症调节如何改善危重病后的长期预后。