Environmental and Water Chemistry for Human Health (ONHEALTH), Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA)-CSIC, Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Environmental and Water Chemistry for Human Health (ONHEALTH), Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA)-CSIC, Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Environ Int. 2024 Aug;190:108903. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108903. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
Disposable masks, formed mainly from polymers, often incorporate various chemical additives to enhance their performance. These additives, which include plasticizers, may be released during mask usage, presenting a novel source of human exposure to these compounds. In this study, the presence of 16 organophosphate esters (OPEs), 11 phthalates, and four alternative plasticizers, in four various types of face masks, were studied, as well as their release during simulated mask use (artificial laboratory conditions). Total plasticizer concentrations exhibited minimal variation across different mask types, with mean values of 7.27 µg/face mask for surgical, 8.61 µg/face mask for reusable, 11.0 µg/face mask for KN-95, and 13.9 µg/face mask for FFP2 masks. To explore plasticizer release behavior, inhalation experiments were conducted under different conditions. The findings revealed a significant temperature-dependent enhancement in plasticizer release from masks, subsequently increasing human inhalation exposure. The inhalation experiments showed variation in the release percentages, ranging from 0.1 to 95 %, depending on the specific compound and mask type. Notably, OPEs exhibited a mean release percentage of 1.0 %, similar to phthalates, which showed a 1.2 % release. Although alternative plasticizers were less frequently released, they still presented a notable percentage of release of 4.1 %. Daily intake estimations via inhalation ranged from 0.01 to 9.04 ng/kg body weight (bw)/day for these additives. Using these estimations, carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks associated with this exposure to these compounds were evaluated. All calculated values for the specific compounds studied in this paper remained below the established threshold limits. However, they do represent an additional exposure pathway that, when considered alongside other more predominant routes such as indoor/outdoor inhalation, dermal absorption, and dietary intake, makes the total exposure worthy of consideration.
一次性口罩主要由聚合物制成,通常会加入各种化学添加剂以提高性能。这些添加剂包括增塑剂,在口罩使用过程中可能会释放出来,成为人体接触这些化合物的新来源。在这项研究中,研究了四种不同类型的口罩中 16 种有机磷酸酯 (OPEs)、11 种邻苯二甲酸酯和 4 种替代增塑剂的存在情况,以及它们在模拟口罩使用过程中的释放情况(人工实验室条件)。不同口罩类型之间的总增塑剂浓度变化不大,平均值分别为手术口罩 7.27μg/口罩、可重复使用口罩 8.61μg/口罩、KN-95 口罩 11.0μg/口罩和 FFP2 口罩 13.9μg/口罩。为了探索增塑剂的释放行为,在不同条件下进行了吸入实验。研究结果表明,口罩中增塑剂的释放随着温度的升高而显著增强,从而增加了人体的吸入暴露量。吸入实验表明,不同化合物和口罩类型的释放百分比有所不同,范围从 0.1%到 95%不等。值得注意的是,OPEs 的释放百分比平均为 1.0%,与邻苯二甲酸酯相似,释放百分比为 1.2%。虽然替代增塑剂的释放频率较低,但它们的释放百分比仍高达 4.1%。通过吸入途径估算的每日摄入量,这些添加剂的范围为 0.01 至 9.04ng/kg 体重(bw)/天。使用这些估算值,评估了与这些化合物接触的致癌和非致癌风险。本文研究的特定化合物的所有计算值均低于既定的阈值限制。然而,它们确实代表了一种额外的暴露途径,当与其他更主要的途径(如室内/室外吸入、皮肤吸收和饮食摄入)一起考虑时,总暴露量值得考虑。