• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较家庭暴力干预的面对面和远程医疗服务提供方式。

Comparing in Person to Telehealth Delivery of a Family Violence Intervention.

机构信息

Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine Child Study Center, New Haven, CT, USA.

Department of Population Health & Leadership, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Jul-Aug;31(4):e3034. doi: 10.1002/cpp.3034.

DOI:10.1002/cpp.3034
PMID:39089327
Abstract

There is increasing evidence that therapy and intervention services delivered by telehealth are effective at reducing a variety of mental health symptoms. Limited studies have indicated online services can reduce intimate partner violence (IPV), but none have tested in-person compared to telehealth-delivered interventions for men who have used IPV. Clinical outcome data from 311 parents (192 fathers and 119 linked coparent mothers) engaged in the Fathers for Change (F4C) intervention following referral by child protective services for IPV were examined to determine if in-person delivery of the intervention differed in terms of client treatment engagement and retention or outcomes. Parents who enrolled during a 1-year period prior to the COVID pandemic received their F4C therapy in person, while those who enrolled during the pandemic received their intake and most of their sessions via telehealth delivery. Parents reported significantly greater symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress prior to treatment if they enrolled prior to COVID than if they enrolled during the pandemic. There were few differences in completion rates or outcomes based on in-person compared to telehealth delivery. Fathers were slightly more likely to complete treatment and attended a significantly higher percentage of their sessions when it was delivered by telehealth during COVID. Fathers reported significantly lower stress scores posttreatment when they received COVID telehealth delivery compared to prior to COVID in-person delivery of F4C. These findings suggest that telehealth may be an appropriate and viable option for the delivery of IPV interventions for families.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,远程医疗提供的治疗和干预服务在减少各种心理健康症状方面是有效的。有限的研究表明,在线服务可以减少亲密伴侣暴力(IPV),但没有一项研究测试过面对面服务与远程医疗干预相比,对曾经使用过 IPV 的男性的效果。为了确定面对面服务与远程医疗服务在客户治疗参与度、保留率或结果方面是否存在差异,对儿童保护服务因 IPV 而转介的 311 名父母(192 名父亲和 119 名相关的共同养育母亲)参与“改变父亲”(F4C)干预的临床结果数据进行了检查。在 COVID 大流行之前的 1 年期间注册的父母接受了面对面的 F4C 治疗,而在大流行期间注册的父母则通过远程医疗提供了他们的入组和大部分课程。如果父母在 COVID 之前注册,他们在治疗前报告的抑郁、焦虑和压力症状明显更严重,如果他们在大流行期间注册,则报告的症状明显更轻。基于面对面与远程医疗服务,完成率或结果几乎没有差异。在 COVID 期间,通过远程医疗提供治疗时,父亲更有可能完成治疗,并且参加了更高比例的治疗课程。与 COVID 之前的面对面 F4C 治疗相比,接受 COVID 远程医疗治疗的父亲在治疗后报告的压力评分明显更低。这些发现表明,远程医疗可能是为家庭提供 IPV 干预的一种合适且可行的选择。

相似文献

1
Comparing in Person to Telehealth Delivery of a Family Violence Intervention.比较家庭暴力干预的面对面和远程医疗服务提供方式。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Jul-Aug;31(4):e3034. doi: 10.1002/cpp.3034.
2
Reducing Family Violence Through Child Welfare Intervention: A Propensity Score-Matched Study of Fathers for Change.通过儿童福利干预减少家庭暴力:父亲改变的倾向评分匹配研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Nov;38(21-22):11666-11691. doi: 10.1177/08862605231186121. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
3
Mobile Remote Monitoring of Intimate Partner Violence Among Pregnant Patients During the COVID-19 Shelter-In-Place Order: Quality Improvement Pilot Study.在 COVID-19 居家令期间对孕妇的亲密伴侣暴力进行移动远程监测:质量改进试点研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 19;23(2):e22790. doi: 10.2196/22790.
4
Recognising and responding to intimate partner violence using telehealth: Practical guidance for nurses and midwives.利用远程医疗识别和应对亲密伴侣暴力:护士和助产士实用指南。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Feb;30(3-4):588-602. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15554. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
5
An Intimate Partner Violence Prevention Intervention in a Nurse Home Visitation Program: A Randomized Clinical Trial.《在护士家访项目中实施亲密伴侣暴力预防干预:一项随机临床试验》。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Dec;27(12):1482-1490. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6599. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
6
Providing therapeutic services to women and children who have experienced intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and learnings.为在 COVID-19 大流行期间遭受亲密伴侣暴力的妇女和儿童提供治疗服务:挑战与经验教训。
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Aug;130(Pt 1):105365. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105365. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
7
A randomized pilot trial of two parenting interventions for fathers in residential substance use disorder treatment.一项针对住宅物质使用障碍治疗中父亲的两种养育干预措施的随机试点试验。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Sep;104:116-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
8
Telehealth for Women's Preventive Services for Reproductive Health and Intimate Partner Violence: a Comparative Effectiveness Review.远程医疗在女性生殖健康和亲密伴侣暴力预防服务中的应用:一项比较有效性评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(7):1735-1743. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08033-6. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
9
Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the population-based study DREAMCORONA.新冠疫情期间亲密伴侣暴力的流行情况和风险因素:基于人群的 DREAMCORONA 研究结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0306103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306103. eCollection 2024.
10
Concept Mapping: Engaging Urban Men to Understand Community Influences on Partner Violence Perpetration.概念映射:让城市男性参与进来,了解社区对伴侣暴力行为的影响。
J Urban Health. 2019 Feb;96(1):97-111. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0297-8.