Suppr超能文献

动物认知,正如实践主义所看待的那样。

Animal cognition as the praxist views it.

作者信息

Epstein R

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1985 Winter;9(4):623-30. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(85)90009-0.

Abstract

The distinction between psychology and praxics provides a clear answer to the question of animal cognition. As Griffin and others have noted, the kinds of behavioral phenomena that lead psychologists to speak of cognition in humans are also observed in nonhuman animals, and therefore those who are convinced of the legitimacy of psychology should not hesitate to speak of and to attempt to study animal cognition. The behavior of organisms is also a legitimate subject matter, and praxics, the study of behavior, has led to significant advances in our understanding of the kinds of behaviors that lead psychologists to speak of cognition. Praxics is a biological science; the attempt by students of behavior to appropriate psychology has been misguided. Generativity theory is an example of a formal theory of behavior that has proved useful both in the engineering of intelligent performances in nonhuman animals and in the prediction of intelligent performances in humans.

摘要

心理学与行为学之间的区别为动物认知问题提供了明确答案。正如格里芬和其他人所指出的,导致心理学家谈论人类认知的那些行为现象在非人类动物中也能观察到,因此,那些坚信心理学合理性的人应该毫不犹豫地谈论并尝试研究动物认知。生物体的行为也是一个合理的研究主题,而行为学,即对行为的研究,已经在我们对导致心理学家谈论认知的行为种类的理解上取得了重大进展。行为学是一门生物科学;行为学研究者挪用心理学的尝试是被误导的。生成性理论是一种行为形式理论的例子,它已被证明在非人类动物的智能行为设计以及人类智能行为预测方面都很有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验